Kat#4451 LANGUAGE!!!

Kat#4451 LANGUAGE!!!

what are you trying to say Kat? be careful, the bot doesn't like certain words lol

c r e e p e r

lol why?

so we can sing revenge

not sure i get it

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cPJUBQd-PNM

its a meme

:o

i am listening, thanks for this *gem* hue hue

your welcome

@Albert Einstein space and time? 🤔

@Albert Einstein the same force can explain every single one of these and is compatible with QFT and has shown to be measurement wise more accurate then gravity

@Akhanyatin again, that's not how QM works buddy. Quantum **mechanics**, do you understand what the word means. And half of that was an assortment of baseless claims and assertions. So far, whenever I've debated you, you have a tendency to indulge in your own ignorance to make arguments that aren't even remotely relevant. Most of what you've said I've even addressed before. You somehow think because I haven't mentioned those I'm ignoring them, which goes to show that you've really got no idea how the flat earth model works in general.

@97 Eleven No way that one force can predict all the different inertial forces from a spinning sphere man onto a flat earth.

Eotvos effect and the normal coriolis effect

I think you are using the complexity of the math to actually be more vague

The way to actually get these equations is with the simple geometry of a spinning sphere.

And yes this will be a huge problem for you because you need to introduce more forces and QFT does not like that

And there is a another force (inertial force) here that gets introduced too.

Dropping objects straight down will also produce a deviated path

Which again follows the simple equations of a spinning sphere

Why would QFT not like that 🤔

Well first do we agree that you need a bunch of weird extra forces?

You realize that we have classical descriptions of forces before we introduce them to QFT

Depends, mathematically the one I've been using can explain quite a lot but maybe I'd require an additional one for some inertial forces

"for some inertial forces"

Oh yes

And reminder, a lot of people don't believe in the coreolis effect entirely

Let's for the purposes of discussion assume it's correct

I can give you evidence for that later

"classical descriptions"

I'm saying that for a mainstream flat earth model it doesn't exist, so I'm not the one you need to give evidence tl

To*

But yeah in all these cases you just need to take a spinning sphere and analyse the geometry coupled with super basic ideas within physics

You will get a latitude dependent precession rate with pendulums

You will get a latitude dependent coriolis force

And you will get an eotvos effect which means the apparent weight changes as you go east/west

Those can be achieved through different causes that maybe more complicated albeit

"maybe more complicated"