Message from @97 Eleven
Discord ID: 607520165323735051
not sure i get it
its a meme
:o
i am listening, thanks for this *gem* hue hue
your welcome
@Albert Einstein space and time? 🤔
@Albert Einstein the same force can explain every single one of these and is compatible with QFT and has shown to be measurement wise more accurate then gravity
@Akhanyatin again, that's not how QM works buddy. Quantum **mechanics**, do you understand what the word means. And half of that was an assortment of baseless claims and assertions. So far, whenever I've debated you, you have a tendency to indulge in your own ignorance to make arguments that aren't even remotely relevant. Most of what you've said I've even addressed before. You somehow think because I haven't mentioned those I'm ignoring them, which goes to show that you've really got no idea how the flat earth model works in general.
@97 Eleven No way that one force can predict all the different inertial forces from a spinning sphere man onto a flat earth.
Eotvos effect and the normal coriolis effect
I think you are using the complexity of the math to actually be more vague
The way to actually get these equations is with the simple geometry of a spinning sphere.
And yes this will be a huge problem for you because you need to introduce more forces and QFT does not like that
And there is a another force (inertial force) here that gets introduced too.
Dropping objects straight down will also produce a deviated path
Which again follows the simple equations of a spinning sphere
Why would QFT not like that 🤔
Well first do we agree that you need a bunch of weird extra forces?
You realize that we have classical descriptions of forces before we introduce them to QFT
Depends, mathematically the one I've been using can explain quite a lot but maybe I'd require an additional one for some inertial forces
"for some inertial forces"
Oh yes
And reminder, a lot of people don't believe in the coreolis effect entirely
Let's for the purposes of discussion assume it's correct
I can give you evidence for that later
"classical descriptions"
I'm saying that for a mainstream flat earth model it doesn't exist, so I'm not the one you need to give evidence tl
To*
But yeah in all these cases you just need to take a spinning sphere and analyse the geometry coupled with super basic ideas within physics
You will get a latitude dependent precession rate with pendulums
You will get a latitude dependent coriolis force
And you will get an eotvos effect which means the apparent weight changes as you go east/west
Those can be achieved through different causes that maybe more complicated albeit
"maybe more complicated"
So it just all randomly matches the super easy predictions from a spinning sphere?
And yes
With QFT
This would be very very hard
Why no coriolis deflection at the equator?
Making these inertial forces to be actual forces will be super complicated and you need a bunch of arbitrary stuff to make it work