Oh I'm so gonna take that last message out of context

There is a definition for gravity

The word was created to describe a phenomena

So yeah we know what gravity is

It also opens up a new point

If helium holds air in place what holds helium in place?

I have a question

I haven't really done much research on the flat earth theory so forgive me but

Are there any strong evidence or theories to disprove the globe earth?

Or disproving it is mostly set on the bellief that those in power lie to us

The problem in trying to disprove gravity is that it is tied to several other theories and plays a big role in the model currently accepted by the scientific community, so disproving it doesn't mean to solely tackle it's existence but also the interactions it has with other theories (I don't know if I'm properly explaining my point, I apologize for the choice of words)

Gravity is also tied to magnetism and some objects have clearly observable magnetic properties, you would also need to sever the ties between gravity and magnetism

The same can be asked for a way to disprove it

I'm kinda curious

Not trying to base my argument on falacies

As I said rivenator I don't want to set my argument on a falacy i just want to know what reason makes people doubt gravity in the first place

It's mostly curiosity

You are totally twisting my question

Right now I'm not trying to prove anything

I just want to know what makes you doubt the existance of gravity

Well

Then it's all pure bellief

There is nothing wrong with bellief but that is kinda hypocritical when you condemn globe earthers for their "blind bellief"

Newton

But you want people to prove gravity exists according to the flat Earth model?

A model that doesn't even recognize gravity

And is built totally ditching it's effect?

I know what burden of proof means

Im just saying you can't expect people to prove the existance of something according to a model build around the premise that it doesn't exist

Newton

Newton introduced the idea of gravity

And also

Let me read that I'll go back to you

My point is gravity plays a big part in the globe earth theory while it is totally ditched in the flat Earth theory

But you want people to prove the existance of gravity while basing on the flat Earth theory, a theory that was build around the premise that gravity isn't real in the first place

Proving gravity isn't as linear as you make it seem

Because your belliefs are against everything that gravity is set on

So if you deny the existance of the bases you can't expect people to prove it

It's like building a house

You can't expect people to build the second floor without the first

Yes

But if he believes it unprovable he could tell us why and that way we can present why we believe it exists

But if he just believes it unprovable and leaves it to us to prove it without even telling us why he will always be able to say it's false

Arach

If they believe gravity to be false they should tell us why

That way we can actually come up with a way to prove it instead of having to come up with everything from scratch and just hope to hit the point they don't believe in

But they don't want to tell us why they don't believe in it

And we can't prove the existance of something they just blindly disprove in the first place

Oh my god

It's like talking to a door

Can we explain the existance of gravity to a door?

Alright

Imma do it like this

I believe oxigen is fake

Explain why it is real

Look burden of proof up

You are getting nowhere my friend

You are just imposing your blind belliefs on other people and telling them to disprove them

Lmao

You are totally distorting our argument the way it fits yoy

This is not a discussion

Arach it's not even worth it anymore

Let them have their superiority

No he is just focusing on one detail of your argument and ignoring everything else

They are basically throwing the fit of a 5 year old like "nhaaaa I say that gravity doesn't exist I don't need to tell other people why when sked simply because k have no reason to believe so but I just want it, nhaaaa now you have to prove to me why gravity exists without access to any of the bases gravity relies on nhaaaaa I'm such a superior human being and really capable of having a proper discussion envolving two parties"

You can't force people to prove something you were never open to in the first place

And this ends it

I'm leaving too

See, arguments between flat earth and globe earth theory will always be biased because the models are simply too far from each other and lay on totally different foundations, discussions opposing two completely different understandings of modern physics will only reach an understanding when people get tired of arguing and leave

But now

If you want to deny the existance of something and want people to prove it's existance you need to provide arguments to support your belliefs, if you leave it entirely to one side to prove something and then proceed to twist their argument in order to refute it you are basing your entire position on falacies and will never have a proper discussion

I would be totally interested in having discussions with people with different belliefs than mine but for what I have seen here is not the place

I wasn't talking about this specific discussion, its the one I was having here last night before sleeping

One of the premises of the flat Earth theory is that gravity doesn't exist

And if they just say it doesn't exist without saying why we can't really explain it exists now can we?

I have a question

If the Earth is flat

Why is does it get colder the further north or south you move but not the further east or west?

I'm not trying to attack or make fun of anyone

I just want to know if you have a way to explain it

But it doesn't

Temperature is affected by longitude, altitude, existing flora and distance to the ocean

I have an image of today's temperature around the world from climatereanalizer.org but i don't have the permissions to send it

https://climatereanalyzer.org/wx/DailySummary/#t2

There

It's today's weather map

By the climate change institute of the university of maine

Lol?

I don't understand

I don't think anyone plans on replying to my question

I want to know why longitude affects temperature but latitude doesn't

I sent a temperature map above for those asking for a... link?

No they don't believe in gravity

Rn I just want to know why temperature doesn't vary with longitude if the Earth is flat

But they are ignoring my question cause they have no answer

And we are all probably gonna get banned

Lmao

It would be more plausible if you said the sky is a projection

That doesn't make sense

At all