Message from @Albert Einstein
Discord ID: 607519714792439837
Kat#4451 LANGUAGE!!!
what are you trying to say Kat? be careful, the bot doesn't like certain words lol
c r e e p e r
lol why?
so we can sing revenge
not sure i get it
its a meme
:o
i am listening, thanks for this *gem* hue hue
your welcome
@Albert Einstein space and time? 🤔
@Albert Einstein the same force can explain every single one of these and is compatible with QFT and has shown to be measurement wise more accurate then gravity
@Akhanyatin again, that's not how QM works buddy. Quantum **mechanics**, do you understand what the word means. And half of that was an assortment of baseless claims and assertions. So far, whenever I've debated you, you have a tendency to indulge in your own ignorance to make arguments that aren't even remotely relevant. Most of what you've said I've even addressed before. You somehow think because I haven't mentioned those I'm ignoring them, which goes to show that you've really got no idea how the flat earth model works in general.
@97 Eleven No way that one force can predict all the different inertial forces from a spinning sphere man onto a flat earth.
Eotvos effect and the normal coriolis effect
I think you are using the complexity of the math to actually be more vague
The way to actually get these equations is with the simple geometry of a spinning sphere.
And yes this will be a huge problem for you because you need to introduce more forces and QFT does not like that
And there is a another force (inertial force) here that gets introduced too.
Which again follows the simple equations of a spinning sphere
Why would QFT not like that 🤔
Well first do we agree that you need a bunch of weird extra forces?
You realize that we have classical descriptions of forces before we introduce them to QFT
Depends, mathematically the one I've been using can explain quite a lot but maybe I'd require an additional one for some inertial forces
"for some inertial forces"
Oh yes
And reminder, a lot of people don't believe in the coreolis effect entirely
Let's for the purposes of discussion assume it's correct
I can give you evidence for that later
"classical descriptions"
I'm saying that for a mainstream flat earth model it doesn't exist, so I'm not the one you need to give evidence tl
To*
But yeah in all these cases you just need to take a spinning sphere and analyse the geometry coupled with super basic ideas within physics
You will get a latitude dependent precession rate with pendulums
You will get a latitude dependent coriolis force
And you will get an eotvos effect which means the apparent weight changes as you go east/west
Those can be achieved through different causes that maybe more complicated albeit
"maybe more complicated"
So it just all randomly matches the super easy predictions from a spinning sphere?