you literally just assumed infinite space

are you understanding the words you're saying?

Also

What you forget

Is that the stars we observe are also moving around the galaxy

Therefore the distance maintains itself

You're saying: "If we were in infinite space, then something should happen"
We're saying: "since we are in infinite space, your something makes 0 sense"
Then you answer: "baseless claims i don't understand what you're saying"

Stop! Stop! He's already dead!

@rivenator12113 lol try climbing up a steep mountain in a straight line, then try climbing it using a curved path, then come back and cry about rockets having a curved path in the atmosphere

Huh? Astronomers philosophers and astrophysics alike all confirm the universe is expanding into infinite space. Hello?

Supposedly

Kat#4451 LANGUAGE!!!

yes, thanks for proving my point?

Kat#4451 LANGUAGE!!!

Kat#4451 LANGUAGE!!!

what are you trying to say Kat? be careful, the bot doesn't like certain words lol

c r e e p e r

lol why?

so we can sing revenge

not sure i get it

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cPJUBQd-PNM

its a meme

:o

i am listening, thanks for this *gem* hue hue

your welcome

@Albert Einstein space and time? 🤔

@Albert Einstein the same force can explain every single one of these and is compatible with QFT and has shown to be measurement wise more accurate then gravity

@Akhanyatin again, that's not how QM works buddy. Quantum **mechanics**, do you understand what the word means. And half of that was an assortment of baseless claims and assertions. So far, whenever I've debated you, you have a tendency to indulge in your own ignorance to make arguments that aren't even remotely relevant. Most of what you've said I've even addressed before. You somehow think because I haven't mentioned those I'm ignoring them, which goes to show that you've really got no idea how the flat earth model works in general.

@97 Eleven No way that one force can predict all the different inertial forces from a spinning sphere man onto a flat earth.

Eotvos effect and the normal coriolis effect

I think you are using the complexity of the math to actually be more vague

The way to actually get these equations is with the simple geometry of a spinning sphere.

And yes this will be a huge problem for you because you need to introduce more forces and QFT does not like that

And there is a another force (inertial force) here that gets introduced too.

Dropping objects straight down will also produce a deviated path

Which again follows the simple equations of a spinning sphere

Why would QFT not like that 🤔

Well first do we agree that you need a bunch of weird extra forces?

You realize that we have classical descriptions of forces before we introduce them to QFT

Depends, mathematically the one I've been using can explain quite a lot but maybe I'd require an additional one for some inertial forces

"for some inertial forces"