Message from @THE YETI
Discord ID: 607352764301049896
The argument follows logically. If we live on a globe that circles and spins swirls through infinite space upon millions of galaxies and stars. We should NOT observe uniform constellations.
Your argument has been destroyed
Yes
That follows logically.
we told you it's because they are far away
That’s a baseless claim. That has ZERO support.
"If we live on a globe that circles and spins swirls through infinite space upon millions of galaxies and stars."
Distance doesn’t explain anything. We should be moving AWAY from stars.
Not observing uniform stars.
you literally just assumed infinite space
are you understanding the words you're saying?
Also
What you forget
Is that the stars we observe are also moving around the galaxy
Therefore the distance maintains itself
You're saying: "If we were in infinite space, then something should happen"
We're saying: "since we are in infinite space, your something makes 0 sense"
Then you answer: "baseless claims i don't understand what you're saying"
Stop! Stop! He's already dead!
@rivenator12113 lol try climbing up a steep mountain in a straight line, then try climbing it using a curved path, then come back and cry about rockets having a curved path in the atmosphere
Huh? Astronomers philosophers and astrophysics alike all confirm the universe is expanding into infinite space. Hello?
Supposedly
yes, thanks for proving my point?
Kat#4451 LANGUAGE!!!
Kat#4451 LANGUAGE!!!
what are you trying to say Kat? be careful, the bot doesn't like certain words lol
c r e e p e r
lol why?
so we can sing revenge
not sure i get it
its a meme
:o
i am listening, thanks for this *gem* hue hue
your welcome
@Albert Einstein space and time? 🤔
@Albert Einstein the same force can explain every single one of these and is compatible with QFT and has shown to be measurement wise more accurate then gravity
@Akhanyatin again, that's not how QM works buddy. Quantum **mechanics**, do you understand what the word means. And half of that was an assortment of baseless claims and assertions. So far, whenever I've debated you, you have a tendency to indulge in your own ignorance to make arguments that aren't even remotely relevant. Most of what you've said I've even addressed before. You somehow think because I haven't mentioned those I'm ignoring them, which goes to show that you've really got no idea how the flat earth model works in general.
@97 Eleven No way that one force can predict all the different inertial forces from a spinning sphere man onto a flat earth.
Eotvos effect and the normal coriolis effect
I think you are using the complexity of the math to actually be more vague
The way to actually get these equations is with the simple geometry of a spinning sphere.