Its not in the dictionary but its an often repeated definition from people on the left

its one reason im not solidly ethnonationalist when it comes to the united states, not till 5 thousand years of selective breeding turns me red due to the lower latitude than my genetic heritage evolved for.

DA JOOS

@Arch-Fiend American built America you have ties there because yo guys built America a country that wasn't their before the European settlers arrived.

The Anglos haven't been in England for 5 thousand years so by your logic they shouldn't be ethnonationalists.

Also why do you want Americans to become like the natives? Americans can build and maintain a civilization.

@Blackhawk342 I don't see forced relocation as genocide.

Well its just... Relocation really.

Unless its forced relocation to an environment that is extremely hostile then maybe theres an argument there?

The fact is that Americans were fighting with the natives over control of land and the Americans won so they forced the natives to move to land that they didn't want. If it was a genocide then the Americans would have just killed them all or otherwise wipeout whole or part of the native population not let them live on.

Generally I would agree, forcing someone to move to a different location even permenantly isnt genocide.

though as ginga said, if the land is somehow harmful to them there may be an arguement there

Cant force people to move to an active minefield afterall, that would be murder by proxy

True if you did move people to a minefield they would die and that would be genocide but I don't think that is a fare comparison to land that Americans didn't want.

we have ties to north america but not as many ties as we would have if we were natives thats all im saying. we have just as much ties to this land as most people who live here now do reguardless of their genetic lineage

I understand where your coming from. I disagree with you about Americans having as much ties to America as foreigners do but I gess we can agree to disagree on that.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5J93U-iokyw

https://twitter.com/GarryOfYork/status/912569043034370053?s=19

ive argued that before for lols

i dont agree but its funny to try and get these people into logic traps anyway

https://twitter.com/cruzer0911/status/962183297970434048?s=19

https://twitter.com/cruzer0911/status/970843364236185601

https://i.redd.it/atwgfjqw6a411.jpg

>We do not enforce the hijab on women

>

smh

isn't that like putting makeup on a baby

I always wanted a goat when I was younger: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vVWMIsHMQPs

https://www.youtube.com/watch?time_continue=1&v=p6CnjdkGN-M

Heres the missing link for those people:
Gamers don't care about the gender/sex of the protagonist
Gamers care the protagonist feels genuine

Yup

Just sticking women in for diversity doesn't add to the game at all. Everyone (man or women) needs a reason for being there.

is it so wrong to be a lore whore?

yes because being a whore is sexual appropriation

Control, another game unveiled at E3 with a female protagonist, looked awesome. The Assassins Creed game on the other had looks like garbage. Tomb raider was fine too, but Gears of War looks like trash.

Battlefield V also looks like trash, at least the first trailer did.

"Social Justice" IS something to be avoided. If you have to qualify the word "Justice" there is something seriously wrong.

@Dennafen which first trailer? the cinematic one or the one with actual gameplay?

both?

idk, actual gameplay looks promising. probably gonna hold off on buying it