Message from @4AM_critter 🐉
Discord ID: 506613468732850176
@Vigil go to debate
whoops
That was their last revenue stream.
Their only way to continue operating is new investment. So far their investment platform has not banned them (as far as I know).
Shapiro is really pissed with Dems today on anti-semitism
A study from March this year found 5.4% of all GAB post contains hate words
https://arxiv.org/pdf/1802.05287.pdf full report, it is a light read. Report funded by the EU commission.
H A T E W O R D S
Yep. Feelings don’t care about facts 🙃
@Timcast since you didn’t do the vid on gambling odds on the midterm, do you mind share your source or is that patreon only?
has https://www.theamericanconservative.com/articles/there-will-be-no-blue-wave/ gotten attention amongst everyone here yet?
yeah the wave is pretty much not gonna happen, but that doesn't mean the democrats won't win by a handful of seats. that still gives them the speaker of the house, the power to assign committees, and subpoena power.
Andrew Torba's family is apparently getting harassed by journalists. They're trying to get evidence that he's a nazi or something. <https://twitter.com/getongab/status/1057042238893477888>
didn't you hear? anyone who is a straight, white male is a nazi these days
Correct
you know hitler was a heterosexual
really makes you think
Consider my almonds activated
I still think those who actually *hate* straight, white men are a tiny minority. Most people who are gay and/or female and even those who are not white have straight, white sons, brothers, fathers, friends, etc.
It's funny they are also white.
I think the video is mistaken re: 'third caravan'. But the General that was on the press conference today regarding the military deployment did mention a second caravan.
This is probably the second one.
@Timcast If you do something on this birthright citizenship thing, this seems to be the op-ed that spawned all the chatter. Might be worth a read. There's all sorts of immediate responses from across the board (mostly negative) which should be easy to find by looking for keywords like the author.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/citizenship-shouldnt-be-a-birthright/2018/07/18/7d0e2998-8912-11e8-85ae-511bc1146b0b_story.html?utm_term=.e7696aaeeff5
Most of the debate on the 14th amendment implications are going to be "on the right." Here's contrasting opinions from the Federalist Society on the legality of birthright citizenship (years before the op-ed had been authored, when this was merely an academic point for debate).
https://fedsoc.org/commentary/publications/birthright-citizenship-two-perspectives.
Alot of the legal debate seems to stem over the fact that children of ambassadors and the like *do not* get birthright citizenship. It should be noted the Federalist Society is very originalist and textualist, so there tends to be a good deal of argument about the issues of the day with the amendment was passed. Put another way, alot of the argument appears to be over the meaning of "subject to the jurisdiction thereof."
I'm not going to take a position on this issue (moral or legal), though I lean in the direction that the executive order probably won't survive on a practical level regardless of opinions of the matter.
I'm pretty apathetic on this one, myself.
https://youtu.be/_nLPsFeSw4Y this is what I advocate for these days. Anything else is just a distraction.
Or China's or the EU, or Russia
'twas discussed in <#463068752725016579>
tldr Austria has strict blasphemy laws, EU doesn't overrule them with <:FreezePeach:420711837542383636>
Yep. So, by the same token, you couldn't insult religious figures in Catholic, Protestant, Buddhist or other groups.
The Buddha is stupid.
Take that, Austria.