!agree

Because Jews do not have a monopoly on economic prosperity and malice?

I just don't follow that kind of thinking. The two Overton windows have no overlap.

Like, I don't understand. What does Tim want that the Republicans aren't willing to provide?

What keeps him from the party?

I'm honestly asking. What parts of his platform are incompatible?

Okay, but there's definitely room for disagreements with Trump's policies and positions in the Republican party.

You can disagree with some of what Trump does and vote Republican.

As an American, if we wanted it we would already have it.

We'd take the southern 50 miles and leave the rest to freeze.

I was unaware of any serious attempt to annex Canada.

There was "5440 or Fight", but we talked him down.

I still want American Columbia, though.

Firebombing Dresden again would really add more to global warming than would help, I think.

But then why do they have blonde hair?

A topic came up in general chat, thought the question would be better put here.

Why do people think eugenics is evil?

It's a critical part of almost all our biological infrastructure.

I suppose it could be considered a facet of.

Generally my understanding is most of the work is done before that's come about.

You don't shoot unfit cows, you carefully breed ones with the qualities you want.

Right. So people don't have issues with the concept, they're just concerned that it would be misused?

I mean, if genes influence our performance, then any meritocratic society is at least going to be partly stratified based on genes.

Who do you feel has more credibility, Tucker Carlson or John Stossel?

This is why we have adoption.

The coveted Tim vote.

Yeah, you'd have a hard time finding a Dem willing to come on and argue their position.

The republicans would form a line fighting to get on.

It helps that most of the black population in the North were comprised of the descendants of freed slaves, who had gotten their freedom through means either fair or foul, which indicates a certain level of intelligence and resourcefulness.

Masturbation is the sexual equivalent of munching on a bag of sugar.

You have isolated the pleasure from the purpose of the pleasure.

First Nation? Nah, I ain't Sumerian.

You guys still feel bad about that?

We marched our natives into dust fields and we sleep just fine.

What's worse than genocide?

Ah, a partial genocide, because surivors can complain. Got you.

Shoot, man, we need the moon.

It does important gravity stuff.

What did this school system do?

It's true, victimization is a position of strength. They wouldn't want to lose it.

True, but they're talking about Canada.

The silver medal of the America's.

At least you don't have a famous march with the word Tears in the name.

You're welcome, black population.

I demand reparations for the Treaty of Trianon.

Hey, man, do what you need to do to clear your conscience. Just know that the victims will never be satisfied.

Walk south. When you hear gunfire and rock music, you're home.

They have rock music in Mexico?

I'm glad I get to live in a universe where the Ghost Stories dub exists.

Oh, watch the dub compilation video. It's gold.

Yep. They gave them almost entirely free reign to rewrite the script.

I'm afraid not. I feel that it's pretty self evident that reproductive organs are for, well, reproduction. Self-pleasuring isn't a reproductive act, and thus is a misuse of the organs. Pretty straightforward.

Thinking pleasure is the point instead of a side effect is a mistake.

I mean, yes, dialogue is an important part of any society, especially one with democratic elements, but ultimately a disagreement might just boil down to irreconcilable axioms, and people can't agree.

At that point, the only real solution is tolerance or destruction.

Yyeah, not the best place.

Rule nazis. "You're following the rules too well, and that makes you bad people!"

Yeah, he lives on the nice side of town.

His wife's a doctor.

Arguing for the necessity of religious ideals in human society would require more energy and refresher research than I'm willing to muster right now.

Well, there is good news. If they get crushed this midterm, there might be the formation of a reasonable left wing party after the Democrats collapse in a couple years.

Hmm? What do you mean, support being innocent?

I imagine the difficulty of the question is why ethnonationalists try to minimize miscegenation.

The more reasonable ones would probably say something like "do your best to incorporate them into the ethnostate, if they become a problem, exile them".

The hardliners, yeah, they might just say kill the child.

There is something to be said to leaving things to the imagination.

Air of mystery, all that.

That seems like a terrible metric.

Victorians say that skirt needs to be twice as long.

But what about ushanka?

...Eh, too easy.

I'm not sure what you're asking.

I would think ethnonationalists would be more concerned with your genetic and national heritage than your last name.

Yes? Genetic lineage is a very large grouping of information, and there's a lot of overlap between groups.

What's the difference?

Okay?

Diversification through geographical spread and adaptation is a pretty well understood phenomenon.

Right.

It's pretty obvious that the way we utilize races is at least partially a social construct.

"I decide who is a jew."

What do you mean by clean?

We'll, I agree with you there.

Decolonization was a mistake.

It was a dynamic process.

Through millenia of diplomacy and warfare.

That's like saying money doesn't exist.

Exactly. But its function and definition is defined by social construction.

Its value is defined and allocated by societal convention.

Uh...sure it can? A collection of genetic features common to human groups of similar descent, usually concentrated to a certain area.

Also, a calorie is a pretty precise measurement of energy.

We're clearly talking about calorie in different ways.

"These traits and features are more common in this group of people in this area." I don't understand why that isn't fairly self evident as existing.

It's...reality?

Obviously not.

What definition of race are you using, Kyle?

Kyle, what do you think race is? I'm confused about what you're arguing about.

Yes. People who live in a geographical area for a long period of time, interacting with each other, tend to develop and pass along similar genetic expressions, creating similarities easily recognizable that distinguish them from other, divergent groups.

A person who lived on the island of Britain could look at a village in the Kongo and say "I am different from that man, and my family is different from his family, and their village is different from my village".

"We have different hair, different skin, different eyes."