Message from @killall9firefox

Discord ID: 506599890600853506


2018-10-29 17:30:24 UTC  

>public speech is an action and should be punishable
stay on your side of the atlantic

2018-10-29 17:30:30 UTC  

calling random shit you don't like fascism is a bad idea

2018-10-29 17:30:43 UTC  

imho

2018-10-29 17:30:48 UTC  

Hate speech like calling for violence is your ideology

2018-10-29 17:31:08 UTC  

Save me, papa USA, save me

2018-10-29 17:31:12 UTC  

Before Ireland sinks

2018-10-29 17:33:35 UTC  

Literally though, if we made a law saying "If you're a nazi you should be arrested", what happens is you'll have scenarios like a homeowner's association having an argument with their neighbour, and they all report the neighbour to the police as a nazi and conspire to have him thrown in jail over things that are hearsay

2018-10-29 17:33:39 UTC  

Just to have him evicted

2018-10-29 17:33:46 UTC  

@Vigil go to debate

2018-10-29 18:53:42 UTC  

whoops

2018-10-29 21:27:18 UTC  

That was their last revenue stream.

2018-10-29 21:28:09 UTC  

Their only way to continue operating is new investment. So far their investment platform has not banned them (as far as I know).

2018-10-29 21:45:38 UTC  

Shapiro is really pissed with Dems today on anti-semitism

2018-10-29 21:51:22 UTC  

A study from March this year found 5.4% of all GAB post contains hate words

https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/398858182455459853/506585864487436307/image0.png

2018-10-29 21:52:02 UTC  

https://arxiv.org/pdf/1802.05287.pdf full report, it is a light read. Report funded by the EU commission.

2018-10-29 21:55:17 UTC  

H A T E W O R D S

2018-10-29 21:58:41 UTC  

Yep. Feelings don’t care about facts πŸ™ƒ

2018-10-29 22:32:50 UTC  

@Timcast since you didn’t do the vid on gambling odds on the midterm, do you mind share your source or is that patreon only?

2018-10-29 22:47:06 UTC  
2018-10-29 22:55:26 UTC  

yeah the wave is pretty much not gonna happen, but that doesn't mean the democrats won't win by a handful of seats. that still gives them the speaker of the house, the power to assign committees, and subpoena power.

2018-10-29 22:58:39 UTC  

Andrew Torba's family is apparently getting harassed by journalists. They're trying to get evidence that he's a nazi or something. <https://twitter.com/getongab/status/1057042238893477888>

2018-10-29 23:03:40 UTC  

didn't you hear? anyone who is a straight, white male is a nazi these days

2018-10-29 23:05:07 UTC  

Correct

2018-10-29 23:16:52 UTC  

you know hitler was a heterosexual

2018-10-29 23:16:58 UTC  

really makes you think

2018-10-29 23:35:53 UTC  

Consider my almonds activated

2018-10-29 23:41:03 UTC  

Punch all heterosexuals

2018-10-30 00:05:27 UTC  

I still think those who actually *hate* straight, white men are a tiny minority. Most people who are gay and/or female and even those who are not white have straight, white sons, brothers, fathers, friends, etc.

2018-10-30 00:11:22 UTC  

It's funny they are also white.

2018-10-30 01:09:12 UTC  

I think the video is mistaken re: 'third caravan'. But the General that was on the press conference today regarding the military deployment did mention a second caravan.

2018-10-30 01:09:25 UTC  

This is probably the second one.

2018-10-30 06:17:19 UTC  
2018-10-30 13:01:26 UTC  

@Timcast If you do something on this birthright citizenship thing, this seems to be the op-ed that spawned all the chatter. Might be worth a read. There's all sorts of immediate responses from across the board (mostly negative) which should be easy to find by looking for keywords like the author.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/citizenship-shouldnt-be-a-birthright/2018/07/18/7d0e2998-8912-11e8-85ae-511bc1146b0b_story.html?utm_term=.e7696aaeeff5

Most of the debate on the 14th amendment implications are going to be "on the right." Here's contrasting opinions from the Federalist Society on the legality of birthright citizenship (years before the op-ed had been authored, when this was merely an academic point for debate).

https://fedsoc.org/commentary/publications/birthright-citizenship-two-perspectives.

Alot of the legal debate seems to stem over the fact that children of ambassadors and the like *do not* get birthright citizenship. It should be noted the Federalist Society is very originalist and textualist, so there tends to be a good deal of argument about the issues of the day with the amendment was passed. Put another way, alot of the argument appears to be over the meaning of "subject to the jurisdiction thereof."

I'm not going to take a position on this issue (moral or legal), though I lean in the direction that the executive order probably won't survive on a practical level regardless of opinions of the matter.

2018-10-30 15:24:35 UTC  

I'm pretty apathetic on this one, myself.