Yes now for instance, I live in the northern most point of Limburg and I go to school in Nijmegen. So not a resident of North or South Holland.

Just... We the Dutch are weird in every way

Maybe because it is... It's a mismatch between English, German and French

Fun fact: the oldest Dutch writing is also the oldest German writing

Where are you from @EDGE?

Ah yeah. Do you get any other languages at school?

Ah okay

In the Netherlands we have more of a mindset that we're traders, so we've got to learn as many languages as possible

True

That first part at least

Well, that side certainly shows itself once in a while if I am to believe the news about Brexit

That is my understanding too

For a referendum that wasn't legally binding we've come a long way

Nope, you can't own them anymore these days

That's awesome @renealc muucav, I'm really looking forward to the launch!

And by *reusing* the rockets you're saving some money @California Nightmare 2.0

Okay, do you understand our conception of a LEO?

Low Earth Orbit

According to your logic, yes, though I disagree. The fact that the trace seems to be going down, is because LEO is essentially a circle. It'll seem to go down. The fact that the trace stops is because the engine is shut down

Anyway if this were the case, why would they have the engine lit during that stage of "going down"?

Why? Because it's in orbit. A circle around the earth. If the earth goes down, it has to follow that curve in order to stay in a circle. Because the spacecraft high up, it means you're able to see the curve from below. Resulting in the illusion that the spacecraft is going down

Well, anyone believing in any other faith will say the exact same thing

But with another God or prophet

That ^^

Yeah because threatening someone based on a difference in a subject is the correct thing to do in any situation

Alright then I hereby place my threat!

Yeah and now because you are so intimidated by my totally realistic and accurate threat you have no other option than to fully agree with my opinion!

Sure

I see, one measures the accuracy of a threat by the effect it has on the recipient. If it has more effect one can say that the threat was accurate as in it has touched on a subject the recipient is emotional about

Time will show, sir

Good day, sir Meow

They think it's the lens, sir

Oh and forgive me, @🎃Sir Meow Sam🎃, but "Orbit Limit" isn't a thing. Kármán Line is

But I am still waiting on footage from Flat Earthers who launched a weather balloon of themselves. Knowing the lens does not create the curvature

To disprove our model

They are, but there's a lot of flat earthers, so they could certainly bring it together. And weather balloons are launched frequently, not only for scientific purposes but for academic purposes as well

They are expensive, but not compared to alternatives

https://www.stratoflights.com/en/shop/

Expensive part will be electronics and recovery

Surprisingly cheap actually

Now that I look at it

Though regulations of course. There's air traffic to take into account.

@Silly Rabbit, Trix Are For Kids I don't, I'm suggesting to use a lens of which you know will not create artificial curvature

So if it shows curvature, you know it's not from the lens

You claim the earth is flat

Okay, then you say the earth is flat until proven otherwise?

Ah but I say the burden of proof is on you since the globe earth model is the current theory

Then we must resolve to make realistic and accurate threats again

Well yes, but not quite a sphere

Because they say it has an ice wall

I suggest using a weather balloon to figure out whether or not there is a curve. That is not an argument for or against

Ah yes that argument okay

Then we should go to debate channel

Okay, @Silly Rabbit, Trix Are For Kids do you agree that the curren accepted scientific model is the one with the globe-ish earth?

Nope, next month

Okay, when does one have the burden of proof according to you @Silly Rabbit, Trix Are For Kids? As in not specifically to the FE

Okay, but you keep saying our photos are fakes

May I ask why you speak in generated PNGs ⅓ of the time @Seeker of Truth?

I don't think that's needed but you be you

Now with that last one I can agree-ish with

Except first line, but that is just my atheism kicking in

To believe in what?

And "them" in this context is? The government of a country? The country? The education system of the country?

So we gotta overthrow the establishment, where is it based? Who's in it exactly?

Overthrow ourselves @Da3m0n2? How? By doing a front flip?

Ah okay, well I wasn't planning on rioting anyway

But the Ted Gunderson story is interesting, are there multiple sources that support his claims?

Fluoride is good for your teeth at least

Or so I've been told

And that's *one* scientist

Must we kill all Germans because of Hitler? No of course not

Why say we have the technology at all?

For those who know a bit more about chemistry than I do, is that even possible? >Daily question

Abiogenisis != origins of humans

Now that's something I can agree with

pssst @Mee6 an announcement of the same very thing every hour is maybe a bit much...

@Matt77 true, but within limits.

yes, like once every 12h is moooore than enough

Hey man, if you do use the mortality rate of certain diseases to make your argument, please take a look at the infection rate too.

>>> Gravity is so powerful that a man's 2 arms can defeat it! Remember gravity has never been proven and is completely fake. Buoyancy and density are the correct scientific model.

What defines the direction of that force?

All forces, as far as I'm aware have a direction. If you pushed something it'll go in a certain direction (assuming you were to overcome friction)

I got the quote from <#617072635137884160>

Never been there tbh

Doesn't give an answer to that question.

That is quite an accurate summery of the American language

why do you, most of the time, use r-t-rd units?

Well the energy has to come from somewhere...

Wait wait wait, computers are insecure because of intel chips?

@Vitmar but it is a major contributor? You do know AMD makes chips too?

Well yes

No computer will ever be 100% safe, but claiming it's because of Intel would be interesting to say the least

Computer drivers?

But would it then make much of a difference if you use AMD or Intel in security?

@California Nightmare 3.0 it's cheaper for higher performance, but I don't like the drivers and support personally

Linux is a group of operating systems, intel and amd are chip manufacturers

Yes, correct

But there's still an Intel/AMD/mobile CPU in there

So trust him on his word, I guess

ARM ~ mobile