politics-free-for-all
Discord ID: 372513679964635138
182,758 total messages. Viewing 100 per page.
Prev |
Page 16/1828
| Next
if people can make a 40 IQ point gap just by going to a different country then the 10-15 point gap average between races is laregly irrelevant
again, by your own metrics, the japanese and the jews are the master race
@radeon The whole point of the study was that they tested the IQs of black children adopted into upper middle-class white families, and while there was a minor positive effect on intelligence during early years, by the time they were 17-18 years old, their IQ was the same as the average black average, which proves that IQ is a genetic trait.
it isn't proof, its evidence
it won't be proof until you prove that correlation equals causation
The substance of the study still remains the exact same. IQ is genetic and environment has little to do with it
And what are you sugesting we do
an individual study, yes, but that isn't *proof*
I'm not suggesting anything, just pointing out the obvious reality of the situtation
obvious reality
IQ is not the sole metric for racial quality obviously
I don't agree
I can find plenty of studies supporting young earth creationism, but theres also a mountain of peer-reviewed studies that explicitly disprove it
not from what you've shown us so far
at least
@BrianBoru I never claimed that
Go ahead and find those creationism studies
Charles I know
Radeon implied that you did
i'm waiting for the melanin causes violent tendancies hot take
Idiotic surface level understanding of racial differences
#NotJustSkinColor
Low IQ and higher levels of testosterone in blacks contribute to their disproportionate rates of violent crime @radeon
Not melanin
how does low IQ cause crime, directly?
๐คฆ๐ป
I see where this is going . Get rid of blacks get rid of crime
stupid people are not fundamentally violent there has to be an underlying reason
yep nice straw man
nope, he will never say that @franti
Only if you're an idiot is that the solution
this conversation is devolving
@Boris Todbringer I am just following this to its conclusion
No
Slippery slope fallacy
it's the same reason why Richard Spencer says he wants to peacefully remove all non whites of America, when he knows quite well that it's impossible to do it peacefully
well, to be honest, it was pretty devolved to begin with ๐
Let me ask you, am I an asian supremacist for pointing out that Asians have a genetically higher average IQ? They also make more money and commit less crime
Why is it that when blacks are doing badly it's a result of ''racism'', but when Asians are doing comparatively better you just ignore it to fit your agenda?
if we accept your conclusions, Charles
But it's not a result of racism
I never claimed that
where have we said that?
what then?
speaking of strawmen...
Well subcultures affect it too
We don't believe blacks are doing badly because of that
literally no one said that
Many on the left say just that
Most centrists though ascribe most of the responsibility to cultural factors
From what I've seen
Since most leftists claim that, I just wanted to make sure we are on the same page here
I ascribe it to the consequences of the welfare state goign out of control
and of course the drug war
compunding that
it turns into a snowball effect
if economic condition alone can bridge a ***50*** IQ gap than I fail to see how "race realism" is in any way relevant
It doesn't
Wow
your own chart proved it.
Which one?
If X gives you 50 points, I don't see how getting 10 more points matters
Lol
You will almost never meet a black individual with an IQ of a 120 or higher
your brain capacity one which had a line lazily drawn on as though there is legitimate correlation despite a 20 IQ difference between roughly equivilent size
From a policy making perspective, I can't really see what the supposed insight you're providing, could possibly help. If we accept that blacks are just inherently inferior and cannot rise from their supposed mental depths, what feasible, fair and legal policy could you possibly suggest that would improve the situation?
>You will almost never meet a black individual with an IQ of a 120 or higher
mine is 126
LOLOLOLOL
No one said inherently inferior
@radeon That sounds like a false equivalence, as your hypothesis directly conflicts with the study I linked that proves that IQ is an entirely genetic trait
how can you possibly say its entirely genetic?
The argument that I've seen that makes sense to me is that IQ and other differences at least call into question the narrative that racism is the determining factor against black success
What is the point of this debate If you dont want any policy changes?
you're saying some fucking chechen in a hut in the mountains has a 140 IQ?
To find the truth...
Considering Whites and Asians made the best civilizations and blacks made the shittiest ones, it would make sense to call them inferior if what Charles says is true
By your standards maybe
@Fulcrum010 If I were to see a woman that is 6'3, would it be fair for me to make the claim that women are taller than men based on an individual case? That is a logical fallacy
@BrianBoru it didn't need to be said directly
Lol okay
could it perhaps be that civilizations that embrace meritocracy do the best?
Implying implications
did i said that all blacks have the same IQ i have? nope, i'm just saying that it isn't that uncommon, plus, individuals with 120+ are rare, independent of their races
has it occurred to anyone that the cultural construct that is 'blackness' in the US which totally rejects meritocracy as 'being white' could perhaps contribute to the IQ deficit?
@radeon Why would meritocracy be more prevalent in Caucasian countries than in Negroid countries? The Chinese do not live in a meritocracy, yet their average IQ is higher than that of white countries.
the Japanese do
so do the jews
and there are plenty of white cultures that aren't meritocratic
Right, cultural factors
That doesn't make racial differences go away
You just made the claim that meritocracy results in a higher average IQ, and since the Chinese live in a strictly collectivist system, your hypothesis can be deemed to be false
they don't though
they don't
They are far more collectivist culturally
i don't know how much you know about modern china but they are capitalism in a pseudo-communist framework
they don't value hard work as much as they value the quantity of work
China is more capitalist than America in fact
Also, the vast majority of African countries live in a capitalist system, so the idea that meritocracy could have effected the IQ within a few centuries to such an extent is just ridiculous, especially when you consider the brain volume differences within the races, as well as genetic variations
At least that's what i hear
they build apartment complexes that house nobody simply to support a housing bubble
182,758 total messages. Viewing 100 per page.
Prev |
Page 16/1828
| Next