Which one?

If X gives you 50 points, I don't see how getting 10 more points matters

Lol

You will almost never meet a black individual with an IQ of a 120 or higher

your brain capacity one which had a line lazily drawn on as though there is legitimate correlation despite a 20 IQ difference between roughly equivilent size

From a policy making perspective, I can't really see what the supposed insight you're providing, could possibly help. If we accept that blacks are just inherently inferior and cannot rise from their supposed mental depths, what feasible, fair and legal policy could you possibly suggest that would improve the situation?

>You will almost never meet a black individual with an IQ of a 120 or higher

mine is 126

LOLOLOLOL

No one said inherently inferior

@radeon That sounds like a false equivalence, as your hypothesis directly conflicts with the study I linked that proves that IQ is an entirely genetic trait

how can you possibly say its entirely genetic?

The argument that I've seen that makes sense to me is that IQ and other differences at least call into question the narrative that racism is the determining factor against black success

What is the point of this debate If you dont want any policy changes?

you're saying some fucking chechen in a hut in the mountains has a 140 IQ?

To find the truth...

Considering Whites and Asians made the best civilizations and blacks made the shittiest ones, it would make sense to call them inferior if what Charles says is true

By your standards maybe

@Fulcrum010 If I were to see a woman that is 6'3, would it be fair for me to make the claim that women are taller than men based on an individual case? That is a logical fallacy

@BrianBoru it didn't need to be said directly

Lol okay

could it perhaps be that civilizations that embrace meritocracy do the best?

Implying implications

did i said that all blacks have the same IQ i have? nope, i'm just saying that it isn't that uncommon, plus, individuals with 120+ are rare, independent of their races

https://www.tenor.co/w6YZ.gif

has it occurred to anyone that the cultural construct that is 'blackness' in the US which totally rejects meritocracy as 'being white' could perhaps contribute to the IQ deficit?

@radeon Why would meritocracy be more prevalent in Caucasian countries than in Negroid countries? The Chinese do not live in a meritocracy, yet their average IQ is higher than that of white countries.

the Japanese do

so do the jews

and there are plenty of white cultures that aren't meritocratic

Right, cultural factors

That doesn't make racial differences go away

You just made the claim that meritocracy results in a higher average IQ, and since the Chinese live in a strictly collectivist system, your hypothesis can be deemed to be false

they don't though

they don't

They are far more collectivist culturally

i don't know how much you know about modern china but they are capitalism in a pseudo-communist framework

they don't value hard work as much as they value the quantity of work

China is more capitalist than America in fact

Also, the vast majority of African countries live in a capitalist system, so the idea that meritocracy could have effected the IQ within a few centuries to such an extent is just ridiculous, especially when you consider the brain volume differences within the races, as well as genetic variations

At least that's what i hear

they build apartment complexes that house nobody simply to support a housing bubble

same with the chinese really. Poor work ethics, and poor overall efficiency, but a LOT of work hours makes up for it.