We're a Kekist Theocracy

We don't want this server to become /pol/

your arguments are tired and pathetic and the last thing we want is the far left further conflating liberalism with the alt right

pol is awesome thoughh

So this discord is essentially an echo chamber, good to know

"you don't like what i say you are a SJW in a echo chamber"

(((Echo)))

lol honestly do you even have any arguments to make?

(((Echo Chambers)))

well, you haven't been banned yet, so it's not Steve Shives level

@DanConway not against it, just, it tends to take over everything it touches, much like the sjws

I made multiple arguments, you made none @radeon

We just had a debate on guns where we disagreed

like literaly, that debate went for over an hour

> If religion is responsible for the epidemic wouldn't you expect for Catholic countries to be riddled with AIDS?

Yeah, plenty of disagreement on the gun debate

and the concept of rights as well

and covered everything from guns, to the foundation of rights.

nobody said religon was responsible

its just not helping

Just calling me an alt-righter for pointing out the scientific fact that races are different as a result of separate evolution for tens of thousands of years

we don't deny that

I just don't care about it

they're not _that_ different, though.

i will go back to my "documentary"

That is not the problem what you want to do is

likewise cathloic europe has far better healthcare to prevent the spread of AIDS

The whole white concept hold no water in Europe

if the IQ difference in race is so minimal that you can easily bridge it by somthing as simple as your income than its essentially irrelevant

So what is the cause of the lack of healthcare? I'd say that it can be traced down to the low IQ, considering the multiple studies that prove a direct link between the wealth of a nation and its average IQ

The Hungarians hate the Romanians

thats circular logic

yeah, Jews were really fucking stupid when they first came to the US, now look at them. There was a concsious effort to work there way up.

there are plenty of reasons why (most) of africa is bad off and none of them have to do with race

IQ is imprtant, but is not predeterministic

You also have to consider what Africa has to contend

There is little arable land

Minimal difference? Sub-saharan Africa has an IQ ranging anywhere from 56 to 70, while white countries are almost exclusively a 100 or more. That is not minimal by any standards of measure

Lots of endemic deadly diseases

africa has very little arable land that has reliable rainfall, and even the food they grow, there isn't much infastructure to transport it as most africans live in small, spaced out villages rather than large cities

you've also not proven that it's related to their race, Charles

^ this

but you seem to argue from that point of view

By the way, the African countries that were colonized the most (South Africa and Nigeria) are by far the wealthiest, and also have the largest white population

africa politically has been in turmoil largely due to the race for africa caused by european nations in the 19th century

@Mal

It is definately related to race

yes, you've shown correlation

Cranial capacity?

yes, they have lower IQ's but if they could build up there own civilization their IQ would have increased in kind, like the rest of the world. Having a succesful civilization leaves time for contemplating the world.

As proven by the difference in cranical capacity and IQ

that chart is all over the place

It allows people to build up knowledge not neccesaryfor survival

between something arbitrary, it also looks like an awful correlation

Also consider that the borders drawn in Africa are arbitrary

how are indians 20 IQ points higher with smaller brain capacity thsn aboriginals?

also if you knew anything about the human brain, the size is largely irrelevant, the density of brain matter is much more important

It's not an awful correlation by any standards of measure. There is a link between the climatic conditions of a region and the cranial capacity of its population. Neanderthals for example, who lived in a tundra environment, had a brain volume of 1600 cubic centimetres, while today's Caucasians have a brain volume of 1350 cubic centimetres

your point is already invalid based off of what @radeon said.

That can be explained by the increased evolutionary pressure based upon populations in less resourceful environmental conditions

question from where are you taking this info?

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Economy_of_Ghana

Some are getting their shit together

again nobody disagrees there are differences in race, but these are based on **averages**, rely largely on the geographic area of the people in question and their living conditions, and in no way reflect individuals

Once again, I ackknowledge that races are different in some ways, but I just choose not to care because of my belief in Liberty based off of ideas from John Locke

@Boris Todbringer how do explain how the alt right has a lower average IQ than the US national average?

IQ is a genetic trait, and environment has rather minimal effect on it, as proven by many studies

also by your own standards, arent the jews the master race? they totally murder whitey in IQ.

IQ isn't genetic lmao

IQ ceeling is proven to be genetic

do you even know what IQ is?

@radeon I'm not a member of the ''alt right'', and I would put the study showing that to some serious doubt

race realist?

IQ can be improved

Race is real

That is a preferable term, yes

Where are you from? @Boris Todbringer

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23919982

It would be foolish to assume that 70,000 years of separate evolution between Negroids and Caucasians wouldn't result in differences with regards to intelligence

i hate how pretentious the term race realist is, as if you're right just because your title says so

***>using negroid unironically***

Negroid is a scientific classification, unlike the term ''nigger'', which is a pejorative term

@franti read the study i posted

also get your latin straight - caucasoid, negroid, mongoloid

Caucasian can also be used to refer to a member of a given racial group

Ronald Wilson presented the first clear and compelling evidence that the heritability of IQ increases with age. We propose to call the phenomenon 'The Wilson Effect' and we document the effect diagrammatically with key twin and adoption studies, including twins reared apart, that have been carried out at various ages and in a large number of different settings. The results show that the heritability of IQ reaches an asymptote at about 0.80 at 18-20 years of age and continuing at that level well into adulthood. In the aggregate, the studies also confirm that shared environmental influence decreases across age, approximating about 0.10 at 18-20 years of age and continuing at that level into adulthood. These conclusions apply to the Westernized industrial democracies in which most of the studies have been carried out.

https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/a2d7/85edd7aa61b7ba51355053cc61d8b924fe35.pdf

This study shows that the effect environment has on IQ is extremely minimal

Are African-Americans, with ancestry in certain African areas, placed higher on the IQ scale than the people who live in the nations of the same areas today?

How do you explain the white people who aren't caucasian, the Urgrics who live in Europe, the Hungarians

If so, how did this change happen in such a short time?

you're assuming white and black americans share the same environiment

also this is from 1992

anybody want to discuss in the voice chat with a moderator?

can we get a study from this century?

@Mal Negroids from the Congo region have an IQ between 56 to 65, while the ones from the surrounding Savannah habitats have an IQ that is 70 on average

so race obviously not a factor.

is this the same for those in the US who have ancestry from that region? Or has there been no studies done on something like that?

Once again, were not denying it, we just don't care about it.