You guys have heard “don’t punch right?”

My new thing is “don’t punch white”

We are here for ideas, not personal characteristics. We build from a cohesive ideology and that is built from all aspects of our side.

i'd like to setup a publishing company but i'm still working on a kernel for a long term vision

Arktos is also good from what i've seen

Greg is solid overall. He understands his role as an intellectual and would thus never try to co-opt IE.

I understand that he’s controversial for various reasons, though.

This meme is great 😂

surprised cynthia mckinney made it on to heel turn today lmao

Haha. She’s crazy

Heelturn gang gang

Thoughts on Eric Striker?

I’m not anti Striker

Strike and Mike has gone off the rails a bit.

@Galaxidus his intellect is unmatched as far as I've seen.

Striker is a good man, shame to see him and Jochim split

So bad news, the hurricane made my really good job be post poned for a year or so

Good news is that I now work at an all HuWhite molecular genetics firm

Striker is intelligent and friendly but his strategic outlook is really off, unless it’s changed. Less than a year ago, he argued that we’d all “fall in line” behind Heimbach eventually—right...

His commentary on the halsey and Duke debate on JFs stream a few months ago was the best thing I've possibly ever heard.

Also communism is gay.

I've found Striker to be a lot less convincing, but maybe I'm focusing too much on fiddly things like "details" and "accuracy"

Didnt Striker disavow his communist begginings \

@Nemets I dont think so, He identifies as a NatSoc

Roman statecraft, Germanic engineering, Greek philosophy - Erik Striker
hands down the best characterization of Europeans as a whole.

@Galaxidus he claims to be third positionist

he's just a NatSoc that doesn't call himself a NatSoc

@Krypto- OH NatSoc and Fascism and general fall into third positionist

When cultured Thug was on he confronted Striker about his NatSoc identity

@Galaxidus maybe to us, but to them it actually is pretty complex

Striker is way ahead of himself. And everyone else.

with respect: third positionism is just a new way to say Fascist/NatSoc without triggering the other person

@Krypto- OH Can you explain?

while third position _can_ refer to other ideas, with Westerners it is most often used in reference to Fash/NS

NatSoc is a form of fascism, it was Germany's unique form of it

@Salo Saloson Not necessarily. I consider third position specifically an economic term, not one that implies a particular system of government. I also use national capitalist when talking about my views with republicans

Striker is really good for history and little known facts, but his politics are wacky.

Like when he was idolizing North Korea’s economics

@Galaxidus I would do a great disservice if I tried. I've spent some time trying to understand it but @ tmattews seems to have explained it farely well

I'd point out that "national capitalism" is just a rebranding of state capitalism
@TMatthews

Third Position isnt only economical

>NK
>economy

hey, Norkland has an economy

South Korea has a real economy.

>yfw revolution has become commercialized
I bet you them capitalists could sell snow to eskimos, water to fishes, and rain to clouds

What are your guys thoughts on the whole Venezuela situation that Jochim and Striker broke ties over?

@Galaxidus I wasnt aware that happened, do you have a link?

dont know it, but Venezuela is a mess.

Is there a vid of them breaking up I think heel turn deleted theirs

@Galaxidus I would contest that because we had capitalism for centuries while also being nationalistic. Modern cultural degeneracy is facilitated by capitalism, but its root is in the media, not economics

@Krypto- OH It got deleted, Ill try and get you the bitchute link

Much appreciated. I remember their argument over Japan but that was kind of squashed.

@Krypto- OH https://www.bitchute.com/video/rcuMdN37jFbx/

There's nothing wrong with Capitalism imo. Commies like to confuse Capitalism for Corperatism, which would be much more accurate when describing (((big companies)))

I will use that from now on, Anglo.

Thank you.

@TMatthews Capitalism is a tool, the people currently using it are using it for evil intent.

@Galaxidus it doesnt seem to want to play.

I'll call people who are against capitalism anti-semitic, which will then lead them down the path of learning that 99.9999 percent of corporations are owned by Jews.

@Krypto- OH Let it load, it takes a few mins for the play button to show up

Okay, thank you

@Selma That's fair 😄

@Krypto- OH Let me know your thoughts on the subject they end up debating, curious of what others think

@The Eternal Anglo does Corporatism naturally come after Capitalism?

@The Eternal Anglo That's my thought process also. National capitalism as I call it allows free markets but intervenes to protect the national interest. Teddy Roosevelt is an example of this

@Deleted User If the government is for sale then in a capitalist state the people with the most capital will buy up the most influence and evetually usher in corporatism

@Galaxidus That’s my thinking.

Thats why you need a strong state

@TMatthews I agree, I feel like National Capitalism is just a more optic friendly term for NatSoc to be honest.
@Deleted User I think that if companies are allowed to uproot themselves outside the interests of their host nation's people's interests, it can become corperatism-like.

fascism is the merger of state and corporate power

Yeah. It’s a tough call.

capitalism is far from what we know it as today

There is no perfect system.

capitalism is also the methodology to bring true communism as a final order

@The Eternal Anglo Right, the corporation need to serve the needs of the state and the people it represents.

@Galaxidus will do brother

I think it's when a Company becomes so large or unrestrained that they are basically an autonomous government within their own country, or a small country themselves. @Deleted User

capitalism achieves an equilibrium through labor, commodity, and price balancing until a communism is achieved - it's written in a two volume book by Marx

Marx who?

Yup, Marx and engles said capitalism is the prequel to communism

most socialism is fascism, merger of state and corporate power... it's not really communism

most people never actually read marx, but it's true

the main problem we have is corruption at the highest levels, and increasing restrictions on the lower levels of society - if the law was applied judiciously, we wouldn't have near the level of crisis we are at

It's ironically funny that national capitalism has given the workers more rights than Communism ever has

trump applying a heavy handed application of American law is the best way for us to preserve what we've built and also prepare for a future that is possible for whites within society. if he can't make it, it's very very dark down the road from here

Economic nationalism is American. We only adopted free trade during the Cold War in part to combat communism in the world stage.

Its people that have no interst in the Nation as a whole, the people, its traditions and the well being of its societal fabric, a plus from Monarchy is that the King had a personal stake in the land he ruled over, not just in office for 4 years and thats it, not actual long term planning can be done.

the more populists that rise up, the more normalized his behavior will be on a global level - he expressed support for Salvini's revoking immigrant citizenship and other similar strategies

@Reinhard Wolff did you read Ian Fletcher's book?

one of the most interesting debates in American history, but also one of the least discussed, was the debate with Cleveland and McKinley about bimetalism

if we never introduced silver into the treasury, we wouldn't have diluted our economic position and likely would have never gotten into a lot of the other escalations in foreign affairs. it was the first major loss on the trail to fiat currency and federal reserve status quo

research bimetalism and gresham's law, grover cleveland & william mckinley

the rest was a result of greed, but americans decided bimetalism was not good for our nation's future, and for good reason.

“One of the least discussed” because it sounds really esoteric lol

it's only esoteric because it's not taught in schools... but it's one of the most important debates in american history with a huge result on the current outcome

Are we discussing economics here?

@Nemets the main argument was that silver was more accessible to commoners, but introducing silver to the reserve was the main kickstart for deflation in the greenback

https://www.thedailybeast.com/report-richard-spencer-banned-from-university-of-virginia-campus

grover cleveland was one of our most consequential presidents, but he was swept under the rug of american history

I haven't read Ian Fletcher's book

@Reinhard Wolff Its interesting, He talks about the folly of free trade, I beleive the honorable Dr. Fuentes had him on his show not too long ago.