shitposting
Discord ID: 398973785426100234
85,553 total messages. Viewing 250 per page.
Prev |
Page 94/343
| Next
not just any things
just stuff related to the people who run the governnent'
please, you think the FBI, NSA, CIA would investigate one of their own with any kind of competence? particularly if someone with direct influence over their funding was the target?
I'd expect them to at least pretend they're trying to be impartial and competent. At the very least have a fig leaf.
Letting a private firm do the investigation and not even hand over the evidence is basically giving the American public a mushroom stamp.
Guy claimed to be conservative as well.
Like what does he do for a living man?
unemployeed
"They said Michael โ who reportedly quit his engineering course because he "couldn't hack the math" โ didn't pay rent at their home in Camillus, New York.
Rotondo claims that he is too busy fighting over custody of his son to get a full-time job"
in other words he dropped out of college because "life is hard man", then his partner left him for being a dead beat and took their son, and he still doesn't have a job.
jesus one case and its all of america's failure. i'd say it does have a hint of truth to it tho, more now than before. we're so damn focused on the whamen
Holy shit. Oz news crew get camera nicked in London.
Lol
Fuckin LOL
Wonder if it was one of the diverse members of their community.
The bloke sounds like a Londoner.
So delusional.
Frail things, those whamen.
but they should still get paid the same
@Deleted User whats not to love?
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/DfGcxupWkAEUAG7.jpg
๐ฑ๐ฑ๐ฑ๐ฑ๐ฑ๐ฑ๐ฑ๐ฑ๐ฑ๐ฑ
lol that sargon pic tho
@Deleted User he eats mosquitoes and his favorite are blood filled females, aka the ones about to make more mosquitoes. Be thankful
Does Steam have some sort of monthly fee to list games for sale there? Maybe that would be a solution to joke games and shovelware.
Because there's a lot of garbage on Steam that I don't think anybody is actually buying. There's some cost associated with Steam hosting the game, so if that was passed on to the developer it might be enough to delist games that are so crappy they can't make enough revenue to cover that cost.
If you cant refund shovelware with 2 hours refund policy is there any helping you ?
they claim to review it
erm
Talented.
But weird for Tim's discord
Is he just trolling at this point ?
He does have a point
why wait 10-30 years to come out about your traumatizing experiences
I mean, he is putin. Half is job is trolling the us
It's fascinating to see some of the shit we see today was a thing in the 1980's. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KB9NN6avsPo
history is doomed to repeat it self
I don't think we are repeating but still in the same event.
who knew Thomas the Tank was sexist
I think they would have unbanded now that it has been pozed. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sVi9UG6d9wI
@Deleted User humans have not really changed much in a long time.
tech is about the only difference
True. I'm looking at the decline of the west like the decline of the Roman empire, both toke atleast a few decades.
its happening
it will just take time
<:sadkobe:397254121897590788>
@Deleted User wait wait wait
If its 44% of the 1% are jews. It cannot be 9 jews out of 10 per 1000 of population
Thanks for pointing that out (maths isn't my strong suit) but the point is still the same, jews are disproportionately represented in the one present.
Theres no need for version 2.
Porn 1 is perfect
Checkmate atheists!
@Deleted User It's apparently been going on for about a century.
@Deleted User When you want to make a solid point for an argument. Have good data on it
porn 2 does exist
it's called furry porn
http://www.hewillnotdivide.us/ its back
@Deleted User the math is right 44โ refer to the jews not the 1percent, so 44% of 20 jews are roughly 8people and 1 who is missing an ear. So 9. Assuming your data is correct.
I'd like to see them try lol
Holy shit you must be in a rich town to have condoms not behind glass.
fuckin 1%'er
@wacka this is what a church sees
That's all you need to know about that article
The HWNDU camera has been vandalized already.
POLSKA
ill wait till the internet historian video comes out
This isn't going to last a week tbh.
The reason why the Astoria one lasted so long was because NYPD was very competent (and the Museum of the Moving Image was willing to pay them for so long.)
The last camera had biker gangs and shootings, let's see what Polish anons can do.
Should have his wife there. She was ex IDF right?
shes holding the cam
Damn, now I gotta watch when I get home.
you wont be impressed by the lack of safety they exhibit but meh
idubbz kinda has this thing where he trys to look dangerous and stupid a lot
Too bad, I always look at the fingers first. Trigger discipline says everything.
Oh boy, more ctf.
not even CTF, it's another camera
that got spray painted
dont fuck with a chinaman that has any kind of bladed weapon. they go on 100+ people stabbing sprees
also what they probably left out: the owner being jailed for attacking a migrate and having a machete.
Polandโs resident Neo impersonator plays pump up kicks while firing hand gun at camera. Then gives a dance to Shadily.
โDivided as fuckโ
Knock knock
They screamed Reeeeeeeee! Then danced.
oh god this e3
strong independent hanicapped black lesbian nazi paratroopers in battle royale
OH BOY HE FOR SHE
IT'S STILL HERE
man people in the chat are salty
lol people are just saying "warframe" during the Anthem showoff
Anthem looks pretty but the actual gameplay looks like ass
my takeaway
COMBO COMBO COMBO
probably just going to end up another destiny
"just play warframe"
how many millions did they spend on anthem only to have it look generic and boring?
what i took away from that was robots in a jungle fighting other robots in a jungle because reasons
not even cool robots. generic ironman clones
why won't this company die?
pure momentum
This man sung a lovely song about killing a womanโs friends and family if she didnโt come back to him. A touching moment. What a lucky girl.
lol
@zero_consequences I have to agree with the black haired girl, Fredrick Neichze was based as fuck, well until Hitler came along.
All these rant channels with animal personas or statues with sunglasses, man, theyre so pretentious lol
They're not great thinkers, they're not informed scholars, they're just random plebs with opinions just like the rest of us
/shrug
You mean like Tim @Chlodovech He's just a random pleb like the rest of us.
the secret is everyone is just a pleb
Indeed.
There is a difference since Tim actually does on the ground reporting
interviewing, journalism, not spouting his own opinion constantly
It can be considered actual news @Dennafen
So your saying that the only when a pleb can be on video is when he or she isn't presenting their opinion. Because opinions what needs degrees?
It's a nonsense argument no matter how to slice it, you can disagree with the opinions presented to you by people, but you shouldn't dismiss them because they're not sophisticated enough for you @Chlodovech
@Dennafen Whoa your Cathy Newman impression is spot on!
@Chlodovech "All these rant channels with animal personas or statues with sunglasses, man, theyre so pretentious lol" If that's dismissive I don't what is.
They're not journalists they're guys with opinions. their words is not any more valid as the people you know RL or anyone that follows the news secondhand
But yea it is dismissive, whats ze problem?
You said I was miss representing you with my "Cathy Newman" impression. When I didn't.
I didnt say opinions need degrees or that ''people cant be on videos'', they can do whatever they want, I only said their opinions arent particularly valid. Not any more valid than say your dad when he's commenting on something he reads in the newspaper.
You said Tim's isn't much different but thats not true since he actually goes out of his way to the source of the news and seeks out multiple perspectives and all that jazz
Okay their opinions aren't valid as opposed to what?
As I said, as opposed to someone that is making news content that is actual journalism
What would make their opinions valid. You're comparing apples and oranges when you say that.
An opinion is an opinion. I am not making a judgement on when an opinion is valid or not
I don't think this talk is going anywhere lol
You singled out these youtubers as having opinions that "aren't particularly valid" that seems to imply that some opinions are more valid. So who can have a valid opinion is it just you?
Okay I just read back and nowhere did I say anything about some opinions being more valid than other opinions. More the contrary that their opinions are equal to the opinion of basically anyone else.
I dont give a shit about opinions I want reporting
That's why I follow Tim Pool and not armchair commentators
the majority of what tim does anymore is sit in his chair and talk about other peoples articles you know that right?
the majority of all news since the construction of news media companys has been someone else dressing up the reporting of another person in a way that best fits their narritive, EVEN if that narritive is to present the truth best possible in a way that is most easly digested, though rarely ever that noble. the invention of the television actually got us closer to on the ground reporting and witnessing real events than before that even though news existed in some form, centurys before tv or radio. some anime or dog profile picture with a human void talking about something that in itself is probably about someones oppinion in the first place is simply radio with nice images, no more no less real than you get elsewhere.
ultimately if you want the truth, no one can do more work for you than yourself even about a topic on the other side of the world, because youll never know more than what you perceive and rationalize, so the perceptions of others and rationality of others will only ever be a tiny fraction of influince on what you are truly capible of knowing
That's not a bad sentiment @Arch-Fiend, we are ultimately the arbiters of what is or isn't true for ourselves.
ultimately even then were flawed, so really i dont worry to much about what the truth is, 99% of us are just going to assume the truth is what we think anyway
im going to assume the truth, and when i have more evidence ill assume again and perhaps contradict my former self
@Arch-Fiend Mate what is your gripe. Why do y'all have to get so argumentative all I said is that I don't like smug armchair commentators and that Tim isn't one since he isn't being snarky, isn't being condescending and cuts right to the point. Tries to be objective, etc. You have to see the distinction I am making. How much more clear do I have to make it before you understand? He is more like Phillip De Franco in this way than, say, Paul Joseph Watson, Sargon, etc.
@Chlodovech You're acting like a smug armchair commenter while decrying smug armchair commenters.
Well that's just, like, yer opinion, mate.
...
I didn't do shit lol I don't know what I did even wrong.
I said something, you got argumentative over nothing.
I said something and you got defensive over nothing.
I don't think anyone is angry with you.
Because you misconstrued what I said.
And then seem to condemn me for some perceived mistake I made.
You presented your point badly then.
Alright.
I guess that's settled than. Can we move on?
I presented my point badly. But now all is good. No more need to drag this out lol
So we agree then?
That you misunderstood me because I didn't elaborate well enough.
Sure.
Then why dismiss some peoples opinions over others?
I don't.
See? This is what I said about you not understanding me.
This was never about opinions
I don't care about opinions
I wanted journalism, I wanted reporting, I wanted basic observations
Unskewed, untempered, I want news.
Fuck opinions lol
youve said they arnt great thinkers, their not informed scholars, and they are so pretentious. that they are random blebs with opinions just like the rest of us. my argument, and my only arguement is simply, no one isint a random pleb with opinions even if they are the most respected scholar in their field. an appeal to authority is meaningless in matters of truth due to the inherent bias of the perceiver of any "truth". someone you walk past on the street may say the truth to you and the president of your country may lie, the only way you know is by guessing which one is actually the truth. infact even science doesent really or shouldent really care how long youve been working, the key to truth is science is actualy just if you can repeat results you claim to occure at the end of a reaction before the scrutiny of other people who will try to find better explanations for what youve claimed and show them.
Tim injects his point of view and his experiences into what he says, and it's not just the facts.
you made character claims btw that was mostly why i felt the need to be argumentitive. if thats not obvious
Also why I said you were being dismissive @Chlodovech
Dismissive to things that isn't news. It's all a matter of preference
This was never about an objective judgement I am just some guy with opinions and I prefer one thing over the other.
Why am I condemned for being dismissive of opinions?
I'm not condemning you for being dismissive I've asked you what makes for a valid opinion verses and invalid one, and you response is "journalism".
i think your fine to dismiss opinions, i dont think your fine to make accusations of character against other people especially if i can point out how that adhom doesent matter
I don't have an answer to your question becuase you're talking about a different subject than the one I am speaking of. @Dennafen
I was specifically talking about that video.
truth is established with observation and rationalization. journalists cover observation (unfortunately most slipping in rationalization that doesent matter and often twists the observation when they dont just doctor the observation in the first place) where as armchair commentators cover rationalization by presenting a broader perspective onto the observation
What can I say? An opinion is probably more valid if it's actually true or well reasoned.
Truth claims aren't opinions.
Oh I didnt watch the video I just saw the thumbnail and already knew I didnt like it purely for its presentation.
Sure.
Two people can be working with the exact same facts and come up with totally different opinions.
Different conclusions.
No opinions.
Opinions as to explain the facts.
Opinions are expressions of what is correct not what is factual.
What one ought to do as opposed to what one is.
I've got a feeling you're debating for the sake of debating. What is to be gained from this? I'm just a bloke that casually came by and saw that video and thought: ''oh great another one of those commentators with a sunglassed persona, like we didn't have enough of those.''
So if tim had a cartoon avatar with sunglasses what he said would be of no interest to you.
Perhaps their opinions aren't less valid. For me it was about presentation.\
Well mostly because authentic journalists don't portray themselves as such.
I don't see Kraut and Tea walking out on the street interviewing people, due to anonimity. Which is why those people use personas to begin with.
You mean like Ben Shaperio and David Pakman?
They want to be anonymous and thereby are confined to the internet.
Those beacons of objectivity.
Ben Shapiro isn't a journalist
Neither is David Pakman.
consitering steve crowder goes to the street and even he isint honest im not sure thats grounds for being trustworthy
But they report facts.
Okay.
From the start it was about me having a preference for people that are engaged on the streets, aren't anonymous internet users, and emphasize being objective and reporting news.
That's really all I can say.
Non of that has anything to do with opinion.
85,553 total messages. Viewing 250 per page.
Prev |
Page 94/343
| Next