predictably, CNN doesn't denounce the "protestors" at Tucker's house, and instead talk about his segment that led to the protests. "victim blame" much?
https://www.cnn.com/2018/11/08/media/tucker-carlson-protestors/index.html

@Grenade123 thats dumb they say it was prob purchased illigaly but then kinda restate the need for them 2 b banned

With protestors like that, I'm rather sad that I'm not a mainstream figurehead. I'd gladly dox myself and sit there with a gun waiting for them to start breaking in my door before calling 911 then opening fire on the 911 recording.

@devboi it's Cali talking about gun laws, of course it's dumb

"yes police? there's a large group of home invaders trying to break down my door, I am terrified and need help immediately... oh shit, the door's breaking, they're going to get in!" Open fire. See how many die after I unload my 26 round extended clip on the crowd. Wait for cops to show up to clean up the mess afterwards.

but surprising theyd put that it was prob bought illigaly since it goes against their naritive

I'd love to see how the media spun that.

@JustTom u say that now but it would take a trully sick person to really do that

@devboi Seriously? It would take a sick person to shoot someone who's breaking into their home with a violent mob rallying behind them, chanting threats?

to dox ur self in order to kill ppl yes

I think you could probably do it in the moment, but after that, in all likely hood you would still be affected mentally

i agree u should shoot if ppl break into ur house

but not pretty much create the mob and set the contitions for that to hapen

I never said I want them to come break into my home. And if they come and protest civilly, I'd be annoyed, but accept it. I don't feel that hiding my personal information should be a requirement to live in modern society.

If it takes a sick person to shoot someone who is breaking into their home with a violent mob behind them, then I am that kind of sick person.

With protestors like that, I'm rather sad that I'm not a mainstream figurehead. I'd gladly dox myself and sit there with a gun waiting for them to start breaking in my door before calling 911 then opening fire on the 911 recording.

It's not my fault lefties have gone fucking crazy and deserve a culling

I stand behind my statement. I would gladly be the one to stand up to them when they go too far.

as for if they're polite about it. I might bring them juice and nice little cut sandwiches. I'm that kind of an amused person.

ok fair enough

I think it'd be funny to have an angry protest (civil) and to walk out there with a big tray of sandwiches and lemonade, and hand it out while asking them what their opinion is for a nice debate.

for sure

but specifically mirroring this situation? This guy who was trying to break down the door, at very minimum, deserved to be shot.

And with the threatening chanting the rest of them were doing too, I wouldn't fault anyone for shooting at the rest of them too.

id say it would have been justified to take a shot, idk if i say deserve, they deseve to b in jail 4 sure

Take what I say in context. I'm not suggesting that I start the rally and order them to go smash the door just to laugh after they get shot. If I did that, then hell yes, I'd be a monster and I'd deserve jail.

ik know what u ment i just dont like ppl saying things like that, if u know what i mean

im not trying to say u were a monster just trying to call out some hyperbolic speach

The conflation of "yeah, I'd freely 'dox myself' (give out my info)" instantly being associated with "Yeah, send them to riot at my house." is a sign of how far the left has fallen.

id have to agree but also u implyied that with compairing it to what happened to tucker

but yeah the left is a scary group

I was directly comparing it to this as an implication that they've gone crazy too far, and someone needs to stand up to them.
And if the right did this to someone, I'd argue the same. ANYONE who does this deserves to get shot.

if you read just how terrifying what they did is, you'd agree that if someone was armed and walked out and shot every single protestor there, it would be 100% deserved.

https://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-46144557

ACLU is demanding a judge be investigated for letting people go..

Isn't their own existence supposed to be to keep people from jail?

... Fuck yeah, I like that guy XD

iv seen vids of it and again i say it would have been justified, idk if i think the deserve to be shot, also nm my last coment it was dumb way of thinking and i dont think it was just u implying it it was just me saying idk if u just said ud dox ur self as a replacment for a left wing mob poping up idk if they r that bad yet for ppl to just see those as synonims in heads thats all i was saying sorry

np, it's just puffery at some level. Unfortunately on any level, once you get doxxed due to modern times, it either means hiring a 24/7 security force, or moving.

I gotta agree with this judge.
If he's being voted out on the complaint he's being too strict with offenders and the public is pissed at it... wouldn't that mean they want him to be more lenient?

which is a very sad thing but something that a lot of public fuiger go through but for ppl on the right its much worse

This is another major thing I hate about the left.
Even when you give them exactly what they want, they throw a fit and start sobbing over it.

It's like letting a little kid eat too much candy, then when they have a stomach ache, they scream and throw a tantrum and cry "WELL WHY DID YOU LET ME EAT ALL THAT CANDY!?"

but really, why the fuck u let them eat all that candy

It's good parenting. If you just keep punishing them and they never learn, they'll just start sneaking candy and you have a constant problem. If you let them OD on sweets enough that they suffer for it, they learn better and start listening to you.

ik its a joke, but the prob with the left is they never learn

they would if they started being left to suffer from their bad decisions. The problem is they've infested everything so badly that the rest of us would suffer too at this point.

when ever shit goes bad from them its just cuz it wasnt done right

Well, after all, TRUE COMMUNISM has never been tried before.

they never own up to shit and they never learn from their mistakes they just blame it on others

and FEMINIST SNOW PLOWING, well that wasn't actually Feminism.

democratic communism tho

lol i hadnt heard about that lol

and dressing up all in black and attacking people on a regular basis while starting riots... Well, that... That's obviously the Alt-Right Nazis at fault for showing up and stopping that. My god, it's like they don't even support rioting and burning trash and attacking people! ... That is, people who are on the right... not attacking the violent rioters in black, attacking the violent rioters in black is bad.

and if not the violence was ok since it was against tyrany

as for this judge. I support him 100%, because if you read the article, all his cases were going to be re-heard in january anyhow... so the only thing he's actually done is give the voters 2 months of exactly what they asked for, letting all of the brats free, and see where that goes.

ok i just kinda skimed it

https://i.redd.it/lnpvaz7yp4x11.jpg vice going down in flames

but also thats a good lesson but idk if a judge should do somthing like that, if they might b a violent criminal, keep em and try them

if 2 months later, everything is great, then the new judge steps up and starts handing out sentences his way anyhow, so no harm, no foul.

If 2 months later, everything is fucked, then it kinda tells the voters they probably fucked up, didn't they? And it sets a standard for the new judge, so he'll either be forced to keep letting violent teens go wild, or have to step up and be just as strict as the last judge (which they'll hate).

i agree with what hes doing idk if he has the right to

He does though.

He's the judge.

i guess, idk im not to educated on this, it just kinda seems sketch relesing suspected violent crimials

since they're all having their hearings in january anyhow, all he's done is decide wether to hold them in jail until then, or release them until the hearings.
Judges decide stuff like that all the time.

oh

usually with bail amounts attached

nm

i read the article differently

"The cases will be heard again on 4 January, when Judge Devlin's replacement, Natalia Oakes, takes the bench."

kk ty

as i said i just skimed it

there's multiple hearings before the actual trial, often many cases decided even before going to trial.

ik

i skimed it and just saw this 'In a statement, Sharon Watkins Jones, of the Texas ACLU, said: "It is improper for a judge to make orders motivated by partisan interests or spite as a result of his political loss."

that will teach me to actually read things

ty for the claification

he didn't just have like a hundred trials back to back and tell everyone they can go free, these were just pretrial hearings and he let them all off without bail. Nothing more.
Like I said, it's almost neglect on the surface and as a hard liner, he's on record as him and 1 other judge, collectively, being responsible for 1 in 5 of all juvenilles in jail.

This is really just a solid and fair reaction of "This is really what you want? ... Okay, fine. I'll let the guy you voted in handle it then. Have a nice day!"

if it was actually their trials, the constitution would protect them from having another trial. Double jeopardy. Once they got off, they're free and clear, even if they're disgustingly guilty.

But as I said. not their trials, just a hearing.

k that makes sense that quote was pretty misleading

neat little part of our legal system we learned from the English Aristocracy. Where if they didn't like the outcome of a trial against a peasant, they could bring them back in for trial again over the same charges.

Yeah This article is clearly skewed to try to paint him as just letting major criminals free out of spite. Yes what he did may be slightly spiteful, but it's in no way illegal or even immoral.

This is why you always have to be careful about bais in articles like this. And why I was so eager to just smile and say this guy is a badass.

If any judge actually walked into a bunch of trials and let violent criminals off free, I'd absolutely be pissed and hate that guy.

But there's a HUGE difference.

https://twitter.com/marcorubio?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw%7Ctwcamp%5Etweetembed%7Ctwterm%5E1060596874577657856&ref_url=https%3A%2F%2Flegalinsurrection.com%2F2018%2F11%2Frubio-takes-broward-county-to-task-over-ballot-counting-delay%2F

https://www.abc15.com/news/region-phoenix-metro/central-phoenix/kyrsten-sinema-takes-slight-lead-in-senate-race-over-martha-mcsally

In other news, there's now a recount in FL.

oh god, for what reason now

Broward county has been releasing new votes...and it's been pushing the democrats up to where they're allowed to order a recount. Gilliam actually rescinded his concession earlier.

Broward has a history of corruption too. They were at the center of the recount madness in 2000.

And that's only scratching the surface.

Rubio goes on a rant and lists a bunch of election-related shenanigans that's happened in Broward.

*headdesk* goddamnit. It figures. This is what you get from the county that voted that fucking bitch Debbie Wasserman Schultz back into office.

she steals the nomination from Bernie, and now she's trying to fuck with the elections

Broward County were at the middle of the Parkland Shooting and totally fucked up

Why aren't the feds bulldozing them and get Israel in Jail?

If this is real...https://twitter.com/Tim_Canova/status/1060575611868114944

Alabama protesters demand Mueller investigation continues after Sessions resigns http://www.al.com/news/2018/11/alabama-protesters-demand-mueller-investigation-continues-after-sessions-resigns.html

The fools in my state.

https://www.engadget.com/2018/11/08/chinese-news-agency-ai-anchors/

https://youtu.be/EhezZ3uX4W8?t=268

https://townhall.com/tipsheet/guybenson/2018/11/08/chilling-new-details-of-the-menacing-protest-at-tucker-carlsons-home-n2535567

The mob in front of Carlson's house really don't understand the optics of how their actions undermined their protest. Then again; we are living in times where opposition on any side is essentially demonized and only serves to hype up the bases.

Yo Ace, I'd still like to have a talk with you about censorship and deplatforming at some point.

I bet Sargon did this.

There was a time when trying to break into a man's house and beat up his wife, tell him him and his kids are no longer safe, tell him pipe bombs are coming etc etc etc would be seen as crossing the line. Most libs are disappointed Tuckers wife wasn't drug outside and raped.

Yes, but white people do it, too.

This is Trump's violent rhetoric.

https://media.local10.com/document_dev/2018/11/08/scottvsnipes_13724676_ver1.0.pdf
http://media.local10.com/document_dev/2018/11/08/Complaint_13724789_ver1.0.pdf

```Palm Beach, Rick Scott V Susan Bucher
Susan Bucher is refusing to allow anyone from any party to witness the counting of the ballots. She's locked them out.
She is withholding ballots from the canvas board and refusing to let them do their job at determining valid votes.
Broward County, Rick Scott V Brenda Sipes
Refusing to provide access to requested public records. Votes Received, Votes Counted, Votes remaining```

That's what someone posted in another Discord

this timeline ...

they are only locking ppl out so they can ballot stuff. Once the ballot stuffing is done doors will open

"BY ANY MEANS NECESSARY"

https://m.washingtontimes.com/news/2018/nov/8/antifa-targets-tucker-carlson-hit-list-expands-con/

that mob in front of Carlson's house is pretty scary

these people are clearly dangerous an mentally ill

if his wife had pulled a gun out to defend herself, it would have been totally justifiable

yeah, but pretty sure in DC its not legal

maybe not legal, but definitely justified

As a European, i dont really like Antifa. I have some friends that support the violent group and lots of people support them. I have seen the violence they cause in America, where they say that some free speech according to them is hate speech. In some cases, antifa have gone too far.

I just post some of the videos from Hamburg.

I think there were antifa who were setting cars on fire.

Also, we have a small antifa group nearby, because i see their graffiti pop up in my area from time to time.

The funny thing is that it's around a middle school, so it's probably some kids.

ANd what they are doing is fucking insane.

If it was someone else that has a gun in their home and lives in a state with Castle doctrine, there would have been dead People!

Do they wanna fucking kill themselves?!

You'll notice they're not doing this stuff in, like, Boise.

It's Portland, Seattle, San Fran, DC.

Yeah, where the Dems are in Power

stefan, the people organizing this would absolutely love some of their useful idiots to get killed. that would be a major win for the left.

No, it would be the Start of the Escalation.

and that would be the first start to the Civil War

evil violent right wing extremist gun nuts brutally murdering protesters exercising their right to free speech.

What if that right wing Extremist is someone llike Lindsey Graham, Ted Cruze...

every media organization in lockstep to push the narrative. "spontaneous" protests in a dozen cities, with professionally printed signs care of soros money.

that'd be even better.

It would only accelerate the downfall of Mainstrea m Media

and divide the Country further

these people only believe in power. objective reality cannot touch them. just last night we had protests with thousands of people lionizing Jeff Sessions, who not 48 hours earlier they were calling a nazi.

Yes and there are only two outcomes:
a) The Media comes to their senses and disavows Antifa (probably won't happen)
b) it ends in a Bloodbath...

and right now it goes into the Bloodbath direction

Maybe it can be "diffused" when some of them get a record

Wait, doesn't the US already have certain laws against domestic terrorists??

there are rumblings of RBG retiring on twitter from some outside sources but i havent been able to see anything conclusive yet

RBG??

https://www.smobserved.com/story/2018/11/09/politics/justice-ruth-bader-ginsburg-will-retire-from-the-us-supreme-court-in-january-2019/3658.html

Ruth Bader Ginsberg. Rumors about her doctors convincing her of the need to retire due to medical reasons. Seems plausible.

Ah, her

At her age and overall poor health she's probably not going to last another year.

Maybe now Styx Favorite gets a Seat at the SCOTUS

Maybe she really got Alzheimers

And dying in the Chailr looks also really bad

rumors are her cancer has resurfaced

OH oh....

"She has told key Democratic members of the Senate about her medical condition, including ranking Democratic member of the Judiciary Committee Dianne Feinstein. This explains in part the "take no prisoners" attitude of the Democrats during the Kavanaugh nomination, carefully orchestrating weak 37 year old allegations against Kavanaugh by Women he barely remembers knowing in High School and College."

Who would Trump Nominate now?

its picking up steam so if its false, it will be exposed pretty quickly

Its unlikely.

She's just too old and she didn't look too good in her last Interview

i think trump had a list

so Barrett or something is next?

Thing is that there is still another possible Candidate

Stephen Breyer is also fairly old

Sotomayor is also not healthy.

She's an Obama Nominee?! oO And just 64

trump is going to be able to put his name on the thing by the end of it

big bronze letters on the building

Sotomayor is a type-1 diabetic so she has constant health issues.

https://www.cnn.com/2018/11/09/politics/michelle-obama-memoir-becoming-washington-post/index.html

Trump responded to Obama's book Friday morning, telling reporters: "She got paid a lot of money to write a book and they always expect a little controversy."

he is forever a hammer

Speaking of news...

So with the Mueller investigation if/when will any definitive information be released.

I don't know how long special investigations like this last but can't help but feel that after 1.5 years a definitive answer would have been determined.

You are talking a federal level investigation lol, theres gonna be some gerrymandering type stuff here.

If it had an actual legal justification it would've ended a long time ago.

What are the lists of indictments anyways? I wanna say he's done a lot, but none of them related to Russian colluding.

There is still no prosecutable theory of a crime of 'Russian collusion' to speak of.

In other words there's no legal basis for any of it.

Well what indictments have been made?

https://www.businessinsider.com/who-has-been-charged-in-russia-investigation-mueller-trump-2017-12#13-russian-nationals-and-three-russian-companies-5

Absolutely nothing related to Trump or the Trump campaign. The Manafort stuff was from 2006.

But everyone in the US is a felon in one way or another. You probably commit a felony or two getting out of bed in the morning. Like Grandpa Joe said, "Show me the man and I'll show you the crime"

Thanks for the source.

Will look into it later.

https://israellobby.org/ADL/1199215-000%20---%20100-HQ-530%20---%20Section%202.PDF
page 119

https://metro.co.uk/2018/11/09/twitter-gave-saudi-arabia-information-about-journalist-who-ended-up-dead-8123873/amp/?ito=article.desktop.share.top.twitter&__twitter_impression=true

this is year two of the investigation

it took one year for nixon to be indicted after watergate

one year of investigation into trump produced a single charge from something that happened in 2006

The only egregious charge they seem to have uncovered with Trump involves him paying off two porn stars.

Which seems to be very tangential charge related to the investigation.

Russian collusion is a very hefty charge to levy again someone and prove.

Obstruction of justice? Much easier charge to levy.

That's my two cents.

Sounds about right

this investigation is bullshit. everyone was talking about russian collusion when trump was elected as if it was the most obvious thing in the world. if it's so obvious, why hasn't any information come out almost two years later? <:TimThink:482277772497125378>

mueller is going to release his report showing trump is innocent and mueller is going to be accused of being a russian bot

https://pbs.twimg.com/media/DrmFM6AX4AAzH-a.jpg
How can you have four trucks worth of uncounted ballots 3 days after the election?

He's probably uncovered something that will embarrass Trump.

trump is shameless, though

The number of ballots missing is the number of ballots the democrats need to win.

Orange man bad

Counting is white supremacy

California Prop C increases amount paid to handle homeless to $300 mil. For 7,500 homeless.
That means they're paying $40,000 a year per homeless person.

Dear California, Give me that 300mil and I'll show you how to do it right rather than wasting all your money.

Wtf is going on in that state ?

Is Florida Man running the recount?

This is incredibly suspicious. In my state a bunch of black students are complaining that their voting was suppressed by republicans. In reality, the idiots didn’t register in time.

https://israelpalestinenews.org/israel-effectively-colonized-united-states/

https://www.businessinsider.nl/san-francisco-poop-patrol-employees-make-184000-a-year-2018-8/?international=true&r=US
http://fortune.com/2018/08/14/san-francisco-poop-patrol-clean-sidewalks/
http://archive.is/bBSPF

san francisco will likely solve the problem by opening america's first designated shitting street

the final form of the 1st amendment

poop is speech

Paris has urinals along thier streets. They put them in after they couldn't stop men from peeing in the gutters.

Viva la France! 🇫🇷

<https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=i6bTgV7FR-A>

"men"

Yeah, I don't think the native Frenchmen are the ones pissing in the streets.

Women are rather less inclined to piss in the streets. There is a difference between boys and girls you know. :-p

I remember back in 2009 I was caught in gridlock along a freeway with nothing but bushes nearby. Guys would jump out and take a piss. I'll admit to some serious feelings of misandry that afternoon. 😡

https://youtu.be/jnCPdLlUgvo

Old news but still makes me smile

It's been almost 30 years

I remember watching this in real time

Peter Jennings was hawt :-)

He was my favorite of the three networks. Fidonet was nuts over this. 1989 was a wild year. Tianenmen, this, I graduated from high school.

Today is also the 243rd anniversary of the forming of the United States Marines. Go Navy! :-)

And tomorrow is 100 years to the day of the Armistice ending the War To End All Wars.

cool :D

I'm only 20. I barely remember 9/11.

I'm pretty certain of where I was, my nana's old house, but it's like a half-remembered afterimage in my brain now

I was like, 3.

You're a bébé

I find discussions on reddit about where people were and what's changed since really fascinating

you get one of those on askreddit every week or two

I was stranded in Norfolk by 9/11. I had a flight a few hours after the Pentagon was hit. Needless to say I spent five unexpected days in Hampton Rhodes.

old army buddy of mine told me he was sitting in the recruiter's office waiting room when it happened. i was home playing counterstrike.

I went up to DC for three of them. It was a ghost town. The only noise were the F16s on top sentry.

My nana used to have one of those fuckhuge tvs in her living room. The ones that way dwarf most modern TVs but with like, half the quality.

I remember sitting and staring at the towers, unsure of what was happening

agian, three year old.

On the plus side I had the Smithsonian all to myself in September.

And I vaguely remember seeing TV spots about going into Iraq

And I remember following hurricane katrina as a kid. I was always into the news.

I was in college, I spent a lot of time watching over a freshmen that was from Long Island and who's parrents worked at WTC.

I'm splitting on this tangent a little, it makes me safd how far a lot of the big news anchors have fallen.

Like, look at Anderson here. https://youtu.be/aosNAGt3AxQ?t=40

There was police everywhere. M16s out. Yet I was able to go places that usually would have been barred to me. We were all so unsure so everyone was solicitous.