SantaSoc
Discord ID: 196163133885251587
3,942 total messages. Viewing 100 per page.
Page 1/40
| Next
How far should government regulate things has always been a question.
How do you regulate the internet, do you regulate the service or the people using it?
So in essence how do you plan to have that regulated
So in effect censor companies that attempt to keep the peace, in order to prioritize individual rights?
I get his point but pratel needs to iterate imo
Does the process of protecting the individual involve restricting the individual in any aspect?
Regulating something pragmatically is subjective as well lol. Give us boundaries
So the right of the business owner to not serve individuals doesnt come to play.
I wish we were in voice chat i cant type fast lol
I think anything that handles money or important services to the upkeep of our government is necessary for regulation.
@R9b1t some things need regulation as they handle our money, such as paypal.
I think associations with parties are divisive, therefore people think they need to be said way.
@RyeNorth do you happen to watch freedom toons?
@Dusty Morgan similar thing to the Dali Lama issue. I find migration an economic issue and a humanitarian issue.
@DrYuriMom kinda want to point out we are in a very delicate transformative age where we foster individuality before the common petson.
being an individual has become a group effort scribble
@DrYuriMom in my particular opinion , in order for people to be more accepting of themselves we have fostered a censorship age where we toe lines unecessarily based upon individual feelings. This had blown up proportionally to the federal level whereas people now call to action for things that aren't extremely problematic for the group as a whole. We have pushed conforming for the need of survival away because of the lack thereof of that need. In that pushing we have destried various individuals and groups that have built livelihoods around that idea.
Is that a problem with the person or his skills
@DrYuriMom i try to be unaggressive with statements, no need to be.
I actually currently would revote trump, but that depends later on lol.
I think people fail to define the difference between taking migrants to help and denying them to help
!rank
So reading that law, how does it habe a negative impact?
I think ability to sue should perimetered as well then.
Because more lawsuits congest the judicial system and what would be small aggregated claims vs issues like mass censorship of humans just like "wham i dont like you".
I think if u have to announce you are something, u arent exactly that thing.
I have 6 billion net worth and can teleport in time
lol
<:timcat:463067464016855040> <:TimThink:482277772497125378>
@DrYuriMom i would appreciate if you would join us in voice chat, apparently dante recommends your intelectual value.
@AHeroQuest are u talking about the previous topic?
Raises the question of what level of falsehood is tolerable. But noone wants to take on that fight because taking action in this case means you are against rape victims
Really frustrates me when people thrust law out because of individual situations.
Press the detonation button on the americans for not protecting their citizens
3,942 total messages. Viewing 100 per page.
Page 1/40
| Next