SantaSoc (Discord ID: 196163133885251587), page 1
Security Advisory: Links in messages may lead to maliciously operated websites that could track your IP address and reveal your identity, or they may contain harmful files. The DiscordLeaks team does not check links and cannot make any statements about the safety of following these links.
Some ways to protect yourself are:
- Do not open files downloaded from links, and do not run any programs that try to download themselves to your computer.
- Use anonymization measures such as Tor Browser or a VPN.
If you are using the Privacy Badger or other privacy extensions, you may need to whitelist Discord and related domains in order for the images to load.
3,942 total messages. Viewing 250 per page.
Page 1/16 | Next
How far should government regulate things has always been a question.
How do you regulate the internet, do you regulate the service or the people using it?
So in essence how do you plan to have that regulated
So in effect censor companies that attempt to keep the peace, in order to prioritize individual rights?
I get his point but pratel needs to iterate imo
Does the process of protecting the individual involve restricting the individual in any aspect?
Regulating something pragmatically is subjective as well lol. Give us boundaries
So the right of the business owner to not serve individuals doesnt come to play.
I wish we were in voice chat i cant type fast lol
I think anything that handles money or important services to the upkeep of our government is necessary for regulation.
@R9b1t some things need regulation as they handle our money, such as paypal.
I think associations with parties are divisive, therefore people think they need to be said way.
@RyeNorth do you happen to watch freedom toons?
@Dusty Morgan similar thing to the Dali Lama issue. I find migration an economic issue and a humanitarian issue.
@DrYuriMom kinda want to point out we are in a very delicate transformative age where we foster individuality before the common petson.
being an individual has become a group effort scribble
@DrYuriMom in my particular opinion , in order for people to be more accepting of themselves we have fostered a censorship age where we toe lines unecessarily based upon individual feelings. This had blown up proportionally to the federal level whereas people now call to action for things that aren't extremely problematic for the group as a whole. We have pushed conforming for the need of survival away because of the lack thereof of that need. In that pushing we have destried various individuals and groups that have built livelihoods around that idea.
Is that a problem with the person or his skills
@DrYuriMom i try to be unaggressive with statements, no need to be.
I actually currently would revote trump, but that depends later on lol.
I think people fail to define the difference between taking migrants to help and denying them to help
So reading that law, how does it habe a negative impact?
I think ability to sue should perimetered as well then.
Because more lawsuits congest the judicial system and what would be small aggregated claims vs issues like mass censorship of humans just like "wham i dont like you".
I think if u have to announce you are something, u arent exactly that thing.
I have 6 billion net worth and can teleport in time
@DrYuriMom i would appreciate if you would join us in voice chat, apparently dante recommends your intelectual value.
@AHeroQuest are u talking about the previous topic?
Raises the question of what level of falsehood is tolerable. But noone wants to take on that fight because taking action in this case means you are against rape victims
Really frustrates me when people thrust law out because of individual situations.
Press the detonation button on the americans for not protecting their citizens
I believe the laws definitely need to be made stricter, oftentimes we avoid doing things because of this culture of not offending or hurting anyone. But give an inch and they will take a milr.
Dunno, but i feel reparations are in order. But then again thats taxpayer money.
Well then wouldnt it be classified as embezzlement or something of similar classification?
More like stealing money from a company or persons without their consent iirc
Pretty sure thats why i dont party in college.
I tend to carry traditional views which is opposing to said views
Sad that new words have to be created to describe something small
Well creating 3 words to describe the same thing and rhats a prefix
Wea>k on ur keyboard why is it that hard to type weak
Lol thats typically subjective and can occur with alpha type mammals.
Eh its a stretch with words nowadays. I could call someone an omega and that would be last guy.
So are they worse than betas or better than alphas
I mean wolf packs are what you are comparing to right?
At what point do we throw away milennia of ideology to cater to a minute group of individuals who are keeping with the age?
Basically my issue is with the concept that everything is a concept decided by humans, so that automatically gives the oligarchy the right to change, edit, insert, or do away with rules defined by our society in order to prepare for events that appear later on as mutations or unusual disabilities. The things we decided are whats what are based upon group evidence as a society. There are legal and moral problems that come with such a thing as trans ageism. If someone legally changes their age, that implicates a lot of situations where we have determined previous age limitations to prevent or create problems and solutions to protect and uphold our society. So if a 60 year old man decides to say he was 17, and then proceeded to attend high school and then proceed to have sex with a female there? What are the legal and moral implications of that?
We say in a normal situation that would be pedophilia or rape of the highest statute, then criminal activity would increase and we would see crminals being released in droves.
Difference between protecting a group and catering to them is that our hard core facts help us differentiate whats a want and what is need. So why is that even a thing? Because people want it, not need it like real trans people because they arent being discriminated against and dont have the fight for protections and the ability to sue people at will for situations they put themselves in. The idea of a transition of mind from body type and age is something I dont particularly think is ok, because at that stage we have to rewrite every law we have in existence before trans people exploit them.
You are talking a federal level investigation lol, theres gonna be some gerrymandering type stuff here.
But our current age of society is based upon morals and legalities, so in what way is this concept of trans ageism palpable to the common person in a way that allows it to not conflict with the previous sets of morals defined by society as a no go level. When we discuss policies and laws that go into effect at a governmental level, we deny one group the right to have said morals and encourage others to push for their advocation of their morals. But one thing in a group setting that worked is the majority ruled based on group opinion, backed up by reason and evidence. But is feelings enough evidence to overturn a society's way of behaving socially? Is it the individual that gets to decide that or the group? The problem like I said earlier is that our government coins what is reasonable and that is also pushed by objective bias, which isnt a negative thing but isnt the entire goal perceived by us. When we as a society determine something as a group to hold true and then upend it based upon individual opinions then we allow for others to do the same thing. The problem isnt with the previous statement more of the state of the current society which is unstable socially. Where we need rules or guidelines for what is morally correct we often get the opposite with people trying to test other boundaries.
People say trump bad, but democrats make trump look like a saint
of or relating to principles of right and wrong in behavior :ETHICAL
: expressing or teaching a conception of right behaviora moral poem
conforming to a standard of right behavior took a moral position on the issue though it cost him the nomination
: sanctioned by or operativeon one's conscience or ethical judgmenta moral obligation
: capable of right and wrong action
Love how people think its ok to threaten and attack someone at their house.
Basically conforming to a standard of right or wrong, which is the societal level of morality.
My problem is these are the people that should have guns taken away but we cant do that cause much red tape
If they are sitting right in front of me and i spray and pray
Individual ends up taking over society and then uses force themselves to make us believe a certain way
Immaturity is subjective @Existence is identity 😂
Are you assuming we are even those 3 basic things oak
Ill fuk u up m8 with the power of anime and logic
Is the Tucker Carlson incident a case of imminent lawless action?
@Bookworm we know where you live doesnt say anything?
I swear america disgusts me each day i wake up and breathe.
Apparently people are indoctrinating our kids to shit we dont want them to but we pay them for it.
I just want someone to explain to me how we are a society where less than 1% of americans decide things for us
@Paradox at least theres no legal ramifications for you not doing it the way i want you to.
Sexual Education in America and how schools force policies to force people to believe their ideas
Basically, if you dont do as our policy states we fire you.
https://youtu.be/jHmGKIBrhFM . I dont have a problem with helping trans people integrate into society, just not how these people did it.
3,942 total messages. Viewing 250 per page.
Page 1/16 | Next