np, it's just puffery at some level. Unfortunately on any level, once you get doxxed due to modern times, it either means hiring a 24/7 security force, or moving.

I gotta agree with this judge.
If he's being voted out on the complaint he's being too strict with offenders and the public is pissed at it... wouldn't that mean they want him to be more lenient?

which is a very sad thing but something that a lot of public fuiger go through but for ppl on the right its much worse

This is another major thing I hate about the left.
Even when you give them exactly what they want, they throw a fit and start sobbing over it.

It's like letting a little kid eat too much candy, then when they have a stomach ache, they scream and throw a tantrum and cry "WELL WHY DID YOU LET ME EAT ALL THAT CANDY!?"

but really, why the fuck u let them eat all that candy

It's good parenting. If you just keep punishing them and they never learn, they'll just start sneaking candy and you have a constant problem. If you let them OD on sweets enough that they suffer for it, they learn better and start listening to you.

ik its a joke, but the prob with the left is they never learn

they would if they started being left to suffer from their bad decisions. The problem is they've infested everything so badly that the rest of us would suffer too at this point.

when ever shit goes bad from them its just cuz it wasnt done right

Well, after all, TRUE COMMUNISM has never been tried before.

they never own up to shit and they never learn from their mistakes they just blame it on others

and FEMINIST SNOW PLOWING, well that wasn't actually Feminism.

democratic communism tho

lol i hadnt heard about that lol

and dressing up all in black and attacking people on a regular basis while starting riots... Well, that... That's obviously the Alt-Right Nazis at fault for showing up and stopping that. My god, it's like they don't even support rioting and burning trash and attacking people! ... That is, people who are on the right... not attacking the violent rioters in black, attacking the violent rioters in black is bad.

and if not the violence was ok since it was against tyrany

as for this judge. I support him 100%, because if you read the article, all his cases were going to be re-heard in january anyhow... so the only thing he's actually done is give the voters 2 months of exactly what they asked for, letting all of the brats free, and see where that goes.

ok i just kinda skimed it

https://i.redd.it/lnpvaz7yp4x11.jpg vice going down in flames

but also thats a good lesson but idk if a judge should do somthing like that, if they might b a violent criminal, keep em and try them

if 2 months later, everything is great, then the new judge steps up and starts handing out sentences his way anyhow, so no harm, no foul.

If 2 months later, everything is fucked, then it kinda tells the voters they probably fucked up, didn't they? And it sets a standard for the new judge, so he'll either be forced to keep letting violent teens go wild, or have to step up and be just as strict as the last judge (which they'll hate).

i agree with what hes doing idk if he has the right to

He does though.

He's the judge.

i guess, idk im not to educated on this, it just kinda seems sketch relesing suspected violent crimials

since they're all having their hearings in january anyhow, all he's done is decide wether to hold them in jail until then, or release them until the hearings.
Judges decide stuff like that all the time.

oh

usually with bail amounts attached

nm

i read the article differently

"The cases will be heard again on 4 January, when Judge Devlin's replacement, Natalia Oakes, takes the bench."

kk ty

as i said i just skimed it

there's multiple hearings before the actual trial, often many cases decided even before going to trial.

ik

i skimed it and just saw this 'In a statement, Sharon Watkins Jones, of the Texas ACLU, said: "It is improper for a judge to make orders motivated by partisan interests or spite as a result of his political loss."

that will teach me to actually read things

ty for the claification

he didn't just have like a hundred trials back to back and tell everyone they can go free, these were just pretrial hearings and he let them all off without bail. Nothing more.
Like I said, it's almost neglect on the surface and as a hard liner, he's on record as him and 1 other judge, collectively, being responsible for 1 in 5 of all juvenilles in jail.

This is really just a solid and fair reaction of "This is really what you want? ... Okay, fine. I'll let the guy you voted in handle it then. Have a nice day!"

if it was actually their trials, the constitution would protect them from having another trial. Double jeopardy. Once they got off, they're free and clear, even if they're disgustingly guilty.

But as I said. not their trials, just a hearing.