Undead Mockingbird (Discord ID: 477776000063897601), page 1
Security Advisory: Links in messages may lead to maliciously operated websites that could track your IP address and reveal your identity, or they may contain harmful files. The DiscordLeaks team does not check links and cannot make any statements about the safety of following these links.
Some ways to protect yourself are:
- Do not open files downloaded from links, and do not run any programs that try to download themselves to your computer.
- Use anonymization measures such as Tor Browser or a VPN.
If you are using the Privacy Badger or other privacy extensions, you may need to whitelist Discord and related domains in order for the images to load.
29,309 total messages. Viewing 250 per page.
Page 1/118 | Next
Just wanted to thank Tim Pool for his work.
Today, right and left are relative of an ever shifting center.
A center that moves further and further left.
The shift he presented was for Democrats and Republicans.
According to politics not too long ago, both parties would be left.
Yes. That is why I referred to a shifting center.
Left and right only makes sense in relation to the current center, not as absolute terms, in that context.
Otherwise, they would still refer to the original meaning of pro monarchy and pro democracy affiliations, as the term was first used during the French Revolution.
Now, it's kind of murky what "left" and "right" means.
If Hitler is extreme right and Stalin extreme left, what am I? Halfway between Stalin and Hitler? That makes no sense.
You will probably find that it makes just as little sense to present it as a continuous spectrum.
Except people who put toilet paper upset down.
There is ONE proper way to put the toilet paper on the holder. All humans should have rights - except the ones that put the toilet paper coming from UNDER onto the holder.
If we could eliminate all such people, utopia would be achieved.
Don't be disappointed. I'm sure I'll be elected.
With a platform like that, there is no way I can lose.
I identify as a common mountain snail.
My pronouns are your social security and credit card number.
Thank you, but please address me with my proper pronouns.
Do you know how many people Hitler killed who had a cold?
People with colds are the most victimized in the history of humanity.
I would totally post this on Facebook, but it would probably get me suspended again.
I could do that. I already have a Minds account, check
I also have a Gab account, but some of my normie friends are still on FB, queen to e4
Also, I keep telling people that they shouldn't stop using Google, etc. if they really want to boycott them.
Keep using the free portion and never hand them a dime, i.e. block all ads, do not track.
But DO use their free services, code, libraries, apps, and so forth. It's like the difference between boycotting a restaurant by no longer eating there and to keep going there for the free bread sticks - but then just leaving.
Right. That's why I said you should have adblockers and tracking disablers.
But, you should probably have those anyway.
Right, but you don't necessarily have to give them your data. You make a good point, because they now require phone numbers for sign up, but you can use burner numbers.
Some extensions even go further and mass click every add that your browser encounters, without displaying them, to mess up their analytics.
@>Cytos, de lieve goede synth Right. You can't associate anything useful to your account then.
@♓♏♋ Whitelist sites you want to support.
But, I have throwaway Google accounts just for the storage space from Google Drive, for example, or I use YouTube for streaming. I do not see what data they get from me, while I am using their bandwidth.
Right. There have been cases in which such similar correlations have been used.
Anyway: What I meant is that there might be ways to still use what these companies provide for free, while avoiding to give them anything of value. That's all I'm saying.
And, of course they are trying to minimize that as far as possible.
I am not talking about getting some movement off the grounds. It's something anyone can do for themselves.
I still use some Google services, and I am relatively certain that I am not giving them anything of value through my particular use.
For example, I haven't stopped using YouTube through MPV-YT, which is my current music player.
All I am doing is grabbing the stream, but I do not believe that Google gains anything from that. Some people, not saying you, seem convinced that the best way to boycott a company is to completely avoid using any of their products or services.
I am saying that this might not necessarily be the case, as there are steps you can take through which you prevent them from getting to what they want out of you.
It sounds like a wacky example, but I like those kind of thought experiments. Let's go there.
I think this is very close to watermarking and data stenciling, I believe it's called, which is basically hiding data in files.
It's pretty easy to do. For example, a GIF has headers that let the image library know where the picture ends, so additional data at the end of the file will not bother standard compliant libraries.
So, you can append as much data to the end of the GIF as you like, upload it, nobody knows, and your data is at the end of the file.
For example, I tried this on Minds and other social media services. I made a zip file in which I put some random cat memes, uploaded it to Minds, and my friend downloaded it, unzipped the file and got the cat memes out.
So, it is not too hard to hide data in a video stream, by watermarking. You can create any kind of pattern in your video, but it might make it harder, because many services will transcode your data first.
YouTube, for example, will transcode your video to MP4 and AAC codec, so your data will likely get lost, as the transcoder only grabs the data it knows about.
Other sites use a library called PNGCRUSH, which performs a similar function, and reduces extraneous data before storing and serving the image.
No, that's not new. I am not saying it is. I am just answering the quesiton.
Right. That's not too hard to program.
For example, QR codes just encode images. You could write a plugin that transforms each image on the fly and renders the "hidden" video.
In computer security this is very similar to what is known as a "side channel".
@Deleted User Yes, I know. But, it could be in the video frame itself. For example, QR codes encode URLs. You can create an arbitrary encoding for data that you then display in each frame.
Even just morse code. They then represent bits.
It might not be very compact, but creating such a "coded" video is doable.
You could even go so far that it only makes sense if the watchers have a particular private key.
It would look like static, unless you have the decryption key. It's not so different from the encoding that TV channels used.
Anyway. It's pretty wacky, but I am just going along with the thought experiment.
Yes. Somebody brought up uploading an encoded video to YouTube that can be played, but is not viewable in its original form until decoded.
I was just walking through how one could create such an encoded video.
I was mentioning side channels, because in computer security, there have been amazing bugs that kind of inferred data through very unlikely means, such as the pattern of memory access by another process.
Huh? No, I just explained what a side channel attack is in the context of computer security.
I do not know what term you are talking about, but if you are correct, there might be different uses of the term in different contexts.
This is what I am talking about: https://www.wikiwand.com/en/Side-channel_attack
Just like binary is just an arbitrary encoding, you can also encode arbitrary data in movies.
Just like any of the letters of this sentence can be represented in numbers, such as their unicode encoding.
I don't know if that was the intention.
I was using the example of the side channel attacks as an example of how regular communication and processes can be piggy backed on to communicate other information.
"In computer security, a side-channel attack is any attack based on information gained from the implementation of a computer system, rather than weaknesses in the implemented algorithm itself (e.g. cryptanalysis and software bugs). Timing information, power consumption, electromagnetic leaks or even sound can provide an extra source of information, which can be exploited."
I was responding to a hypothetical question.
The question, as I understood it, was whether one can "hide" data in an otherwise valid video.
Yes, but you can still encode whatever you please in the data you upload.
But, that's really, REALLY hypothetical.
I was just playing along, because I liked the thought experiment.
Anyway, we're so far off topic now, we took the safari to Russia.
It's amazing to me how far people can dig in their heel.
When I heard of the Kavanaugh thing, I thought: "Man, this one they really have to concede is crazy."
Then, I go to TYT and it's basically all: "BELIEVE WOMEN! BELIEVE WOMEN!"
Men and women are perfectly equal, except men are all rapists and women never lie. Got it.
Most people only learn when they got burned by this anti-rational madness. So, as sad as it is to see some people get ruined, it's the only way to wake them up.
But, so did I. I was a full on lefty.
Sorry, not trying to be condescending.
UVA, Duke Lacrosse, Jian Ghomeshi, Brian Branks, ...
Mattress Girl, Mustafa Uruay, Marvin Zuker, Mandi Gray
Pretty much all high profile rape cases turned to sh*t.
Yeah, right ... that's exactly what someone who was sexually assaulted would do.
But, there is no typical behavior for rape victims now, the left tells us.
During the Satanic Panic it was "Believe the children!"
But, I think false rape allegations are a little oder than that.
All the studies that pre-date feminist cleansing found a false allegation rate of 40-80%.
McDouglas, Kanin, studies from Germany, UK, Australia
Most frequent reason for lying: VIndictiveness and avoiding societal shaming.
Currently, about HALF of all exonerations by the Innocence Project are of men having been falsely convicted of rape, conclusively exonerated.
Rape, however, only makes up 1/20th of all violent crime. The Innocence Project takes on all cases that seem to have a chance to succeed. Roughly speaking, we can say that false allegations happen at a rate 4 times as high for rape.
The average falsely convicted man spends 11 years in prison.
There are 300,000 rapes in federal prison per year.
The rate of HIV infections in penal institutions is 4-8x that of the general population, depending on type of institution.
If this doesn't scare people, they are not paying attention.
Yes, the statistic padding has been infamous in the feminist peddled studies.
One of the most egregious cases are probably the study by Koss in 1994, the Duluth Model, or the Violence Against Women Act (VAWA).
All were peddled and sponsored with a degree of manipulation and conflicts of interest that would have immediately disqualified any other scientific publication.
Feminism is one of the biggest shams in the 20th century - and we are all paying, men, boys, girls, and women alike.
Nobody is being helped by these lies. I am absolutely disgusted by it.
When I first listened to Erin Pizzey at the ICMI, I was absolutely blown away.
But, I am also really delighted - I don't use that word a lot - that people here actually seem to know about those things, that it's finally seeping into the general knowledge.
People here are probably a cut above the normie population, so add another 10 years and the state of knowledge here might be the normie knowledge. One can only hope.
Lacie Green used to be full on listen and believe.
Men and women are perfectly equal - except men are so bad that they are more likely to rape than women are likely to lie.
A man would rather rape than a woman would lie. Thanks feminism.
It's scary that they basically own all the courts.
While we celebrate that we are wining the "culture war" on YouTube, they pass law after law that further erode rights and due process.
@Tal,Karpov,AlekhineAllCoolGuys I'm not even sure about that. I think men tend to be more physically aggressive, but in a situation of similar power differential, I think women rape at about the same rates.
It's what you can now see in a lot of schools - except, there we don't call it rape, of course. It's a "tryst" or an "affair".
Hmm ... I don't know. I would have found it just as obvious as you a few years ago, but with all the rampant double standards, where we do not even acknowledge rape by women, it's pretty hard to tell.
Remember that the FBI didn't even acknowledge a definition of rape according to which women could rape men until 2013.
So, if it's defined away, it's hard to find data in the literature on it.
Studies have found similar psychological reaction by boys who have been taken advantage of.
I think there have been about half a dozen on the subject now.
Then what about women's rape fantasies?
You can arouse men against their will, even without viagra.
And we won't know until the reporting is objective and the same for men as it is for women.
If the genders were reversed, there would be an outcry if a woman had to pay child support to her rapist.
We do not have double standards, and we minimize the effect and impact on men.
Well, if I would use the feminist definition, I think I was raped 6? times.
Pressured into sex when not completely in the mood, under the influence of alcohol, a power differential in positions.
Touched while I was asleep, let's see what else?
Hmm ... I was probably raped a dozen times or so.
And don't forget explicit, enthusiastic consent, a la yes means yes.
I should make a Go Fund Me. Pls donate
Also, Brett Kavanaugh raped me 999999999 times in 1459. I can't remember where or when exactly and there were no witnesses.
I think Ford has a neurological condition. Not being snarky here. She keeps opening and closing her mouth.
I have seen that before, but I am not sure how indicative it is.
I have seen it in people with Parkinson. I am not an expert. Maybe there was something else going on.
Anyway, it's weird. But I'd have to look into it. I might be completely off the mark here.
Equality before the law would be great.
There is currently a gender sentencing gap of 60%, in terms of prison time and chances of conviction.
Tillyer, Rob, Richard D. Hartley, and Jeffrey T. Ward. "Differential treatment of female defendants: Does criminal history moderate the effect of gender on sentence length in federal narcotics cases?." Criminal justice and behavior 42.7 (2015): 703-721.
Starr, Sonja B. "Estimating gender disparities in federal criminal cases." American Law and Economics Review 17.1 (2014): 127-159.
Equality before the law requires us to be ruled by NAZI PUGS!!!Q
That's also why the rate of false allegations, or the supposed rate, should not enter into due process.
If that was the case, we should get rid of trials in murder cases, because the rate of false convictions is so low.
Or, as the crime rate changes, we would have to adjust due process. We just generate a random number, with percentages roughly equal to the false conviction rate, to decide if someone is guilty.
Unsurprinsingly, the channel only has 1.7K subs, but at least it's on YT.
I think the person that initially turned me away from the "left" was Thomas Sowell.
I'd say he pulled the thread that eventually caused the whole sweater to unravel.
Did you ask for my consent before talking to me?
My consent has to be enthusiastic and ongoing. So please ask me before each message.
That Quartering video is interesting.
I have friends at Amazon, Google, and Microsoft. They all say roughly the same.
That's true. Men can even get hard when unconscious.
Actually ... now that you put it that way ...
when i think of all the awkward boners i couldn't get rid of
Yeah, erection is a pretty bad measurement for consent.
There are many processes we are only partially in control of.
That's getting too hyperbolic for me.
Okay, you keep going. I don't want to gang up on him.
or make him feel like that's what we're doing
Women's bodies have a way of shutting that process down.
Sorry, I had to rip on Republicans from time to time, too.
Nah, it's all fine, as long as we are attacking ideas, not people.
Not knowing is a good place to start, actually.
Too murky to lock someone up over for 20 years.
Well, you were involved in the Declaration of Independence. So there.
Should we count 50 Shades of Rape on the women's side?
If God doesn't exist, why does this banana fit into my hand perfectly?
Yes, as long as they don't main Symmetra on Overwatch.
Nah, he's just being devil's advocate.
watching HOney Badgers halloween stream
I think they should only make movies that are remakes in which they gender swap all characters.
If Caitlyn Jenner puts on the Super Crown, does he turn into a woman?
Maybe he was having issues with his ... tranny.
He had always been a woman, according to him, so yes.
He was born a woman. That's what he said.
29,309 total messages. Viewing 250 per page.
Page 1/118 | Next