i only caught some of the Tulsi episode, but she is pretty sharp, def one to watch in the future

it really surprises me that Rogan manages to keep himself considered as on the left, as much as he interviews the "wrong think" people, i am still shocked he hasnt been pestered more than he has

I don't think he's an easy target

he's been doing this for awhile, and he knows a lot of people

ya its hard to call a guy that can kill you with one hand an easy target lol

lol, that, too xP

(i know thats not what you meant)

lol

Dave Rubin does the same thing

Rubin does take some heat

dave is seen as on the right though isnt he? at least by the left at large

Considers himself to be on the left, but everytime he invites lefties on they decline

ya

i think he has a good show too

So he ends up interviewing right wingers and people who have jumped ship from the left

would be interesting to see those interviews

Though i think the best episodes are ones that deal with issues completely unrelated to politics

LOL just relooked at this chart

Dave cullen is all alone

Like the one he had where he brought on a woman who founded charter schools in london

poor computing forever

love that channel though

Computing forever?

its got yellow lines linking it to other stuff

oh wait, there are lines, they were just very very very feint on my screen

ya computing forever's channel

at first looked like the dot was just sitting there on its own with no lines to it

everyone on this list just needs to have their OWN youtube con and watch it blow up as the biggest event this year

you could probably get 80ish% of the people on this list to show up if the situation was right

A lot of people like to say "classical liberal" like Dave Rubin, Sargon, Alex Jones, etc., generally as far as the mainstream narrative goes that's right of center at best.

or "Jeffersonian liberal"

ya i have had a hard time with the new classification system. all i ever knew was left or right... now there are like a million inbetween stances that really dont seem to mean much to anyone other than the guy saying it

(i know the classifications arent new, just new that they are sort of returning)

A lot of these stances are old as fuck

>madchatter: because destroying something is a way to control it
Learned that from Paul Atreides.

It's just that people like to destroy all nuance and present something in pure us vs them terms

Dave Rubin is just about the most G-rated family friendly guy imaginable. The only remotely controversial thing you could say about him is that he's willing to talk to anyone.

And that then causes people to think of themselves as being part of a dichotomous conflict

If the SJWs & commies would actually be willing to talk to people like Rubin they might be able to actually humanize themselves but as it stands they just come off as pod people.

They cant afford to have reasonable discussions with people as it might cause their acolytes to lose faith in the cause

@TylerC >have their OWN youtube con
Wasn't that tried and it failed because someone tried to force a code of conduct with speech restrictions?

not sure

i guess milo's berkley even miiight count

but i would see this as needing to be away from a college campus

similar to the vidcon

just with only the "undesirables" that youtube is trying to shit on

if someone hosts it, people will show up

It could work but the people organizing and backing it would have to be 100% free speech advocates who don't care about controversy.

agreed

Someone independently wealthy who doesn't give a fuck.

100% they would get targeted

not sure who would be able to pull it off other than maybe peter tiel or someone of that level

just someone on that level is all i mean

I doubt Tiel would be interested. He'd want a safe return.

same

i dont think he would care enough about it to organize it, but i could be wrong

would almost say have the NRA try to put it together

but not sure if that might automatically screw the event

but it would bring out all the freedom of speechers and the gun owners to see what in the hell is up

it's a possibility, but people who support the NRA and people who support freedom of speech aren't entirely overlapping. while most have died of old age, there are plenty of bible-thumper paleocons out there who wouldn't want to be associated with some of the folk on *the list*

I hang out on AR15.com a lot and they're split roughly 50/50 over this social media censorship stuff.

you arent wrong there, and vice versa, buuuut, it would be a hell of a show to say, we can all stand together for our rights

i find that interesting about the ar15.com forums, but not overly surprising

it wasnt too long ago the calls for censorship were from the right

Their argument is a pretty typical conservative stance of "it's a free market", "private businesses should be able to do whatever they want", "just build your own" etc. Applying boilerplate ideological answers without deeper investigation of the problem.

agreed

we are getting that from both sides currently

4. "Make the enemy live up to its own book of rules."

ya good luck with that one

lol

"Anyone who believes X position hasn't investigated the issue"
Wew

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZXLuqQe8DqQ

project veritas released a new video today about the deep state

Cringy intro, not shocking content.

So I was reading an article in the bbc, "The truth about false assault accusations by women" from 4 hours ago. Such an opinion piece but can't find it marked as opinion piece anywhere, am I missing something?

Just the first few paragraphs tells you it's an opinion piece, then the ending just cements it even more

Here is the article in question, https://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-45565684

all news is opinion now don'cha kno

I suppose it is my fault for expecting more from the bbc

https://www.thecollegefix.com/boston-u-honors-college-abandons-socratic-method-western-canon-in-favor-of-social-justice-curriculum/

I've never heard of the people at the center of this whole thing. I suspect this is another instance of the far left eating the center left. Except there doesn't seem to be much noise being made about it.

man thats one way for a school to shoot itself in the foot

http://noqreport.com/2018/09/18/christine-blasey-fords-rate-professors-conveniently-blank/

she is the one accusing kavanaugh of groping her

Check for archived versions I guess.

would be nice if they exist

i have only used the archive sites once

i would be a small fish in the ocean if i go there

no snapshots on wayback except from today

nothing on archive.is older than yesterday

I don't think she taught any classes. She's listed as an affiliate professor.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=E81zWJI26kE

It's important to note that she sometimes drops the 'Ford' and just goes by 'Christine Blasey'

<https://scholar.google.com/citations?user=J2T7HxgAAAAJ&hl=en&oi=ao>

https://dailycaller.com/2018/09/18/soros-kavanaugh-protesters/

http://www.abc.net.au/news/2018-09-18/china-social-credit-a-model-citizen-in-a-digital-dictatorship/10200278

~~RateMyProfessors had some nice reviews on Ford for a bit. And then it got brigaded. I think DailyWire or DailySignal pulled a couple reviews before it all went bad. I don't have time to find it, but the basic story was that she was one of *those* feminists who uses the classroom as a bully pulpit and has something against guys.~~

The story was redacted. Apparently there's no reviews for Ford.

i read comments that said that the overall sentiments of the students were negative on her

would be nice to know from actual sources

alas

Went looking. Apparently it wasn't Dailywire. It was Grabien (which I never heard of and is probably why I confused it with DailyWire). And they got the wrong person and retracted.

This is why you check sources. Dailywire tends to be pretty reliable on these things. The weird fringe sites not so much.

https://www.theguardian.com/media/2018/sep/18/report-youtubes-alternative-influence-network-breeds-rightwing-radicalisation Does this belong in here? Could be interesting for Pool as he's mentioned in this.

@Sjaleo Tim already commented this on twitter.

Ah

Feminist < Whamanist

Not sure if <#398858182455459853> is for such news: https://www.vanityfair.com/news/2018/07/the-man-who-created-the-world-wide-web-has-some-regrets but I totally agree with him. (edit: oh, it's 2 months old)

https://youtu.be/S9qugiX6uYY

ah uks

uk where they wanted to ban all closed sites so people cant

congregate

I am SO glad I moved from the UK to Germany

I will take Merkel over May ANY day of the week

https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/2018/09/19/poland-used-be-ok-with-trump-then-he-posted-photo/

Is it true?

Do poles hate trump now?

"fallout was all over Polish news sites" and they only managed to mention gazeta.pl 😃 gazeta.pl is leftist news site - that's in opposition to rulling party. It's half-truth (or just propaganda) I would say - they want Poles to hate Trump, Duda and rulling party 😉

Ahh

Good to know

Pretty sure if they're naming a base "Fort Trump" they probably like the guy.

When a wise man points at the moon, an idiot looks at his finger-bunch of articles about photo, not a lot about details what was in that declaration.

Other thing being- photo is silly, and someone should talk to whoever staged that whole scene

https://news.sky.com/story/ukip-leader-gerard-batten-criticised-by-nigel-farage-for-endorsing-anti-muslim-rally-11500884 So I just saw this

He does have a point.

UKIP needs to focus on brexit first and once they are out of the EU they can deal with the migrant issue.

Active shooter in Wisconsin.

https://apnews.com/c60faad9b88a473a954598662534436e?utm_campaign=SocialFlow&utm_source=Twitter&utm_medium=AP

https://gizmodo.com/3d-printed-gun-activist-cody-wilson-charged-with-sexual-1829168263

It's not embedding cuz roles are a fuck but the guy behind the 3d printed guns thing is accused of having sex with a girl under 17

4 injured at software company in Wisconsin. Suspect shoot, not dead.

I wouldn't be surprised if he's being framed, though I don't want to compare this to Assange...

https://edition.cnn.com/2018/09/18/asia/north-korea-south-korea-summit-intl/index.html

I'm not going to hold allegations like that against a political target of the left as credible.

It is not just the Left that don't like 3D printers. I don't think I can stress this enough. There is a massive fight coming in this space.

The Left is afraid of anything that truely empowers individuals

and the Right are petrified of losing IP rights.

https://www.theverge.com/2018/9/19/17878332/creepy-line-anti-google-facebook-conservative-censorship-documentary-review-right-wing - they're dissing some movie, but imo whole article is well balanced (despite "right wing" in the title) 😉

I find lots of articles have "right wing" in the title then present a balanced article to try and subvert expectations

HOWEVER, idiots don't read past the headline

https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/washington-secrets/nearly-half-in-top-5-u-s-cities-dont-speak-english-at-home-record-67-million

On one hand, it's in the home so who really cares. On the other, does this mean they are not teaching their kids English?

And the Yanks tossed stones at UK when the same was about one of our cities. 67 million is nearly the entire population of the UK.

The good ones will be teaching their kids. It's needed for school.

You know it use to be that the first Generation Imagrant families would send their kids to school and they have them speak english to them at home so the parents would learn english from their kids.

That is why you have the steriotype of the imigrants speaking broken english

Idk if this is a good idea, but what if you had to pass a English test to get the right to vote, even if you are a citizen.

Agreed 100%

I think you should have to pass an english test to get citizenship.

If I had my way you would get no government help if you could not speak the native language.

I know when my father came into the country he had to pass an test on US civics in english before he got US Citizenship

anyway, enought of freedom land

https://twitter.com/SunPolitics/status/1042418034391101440

FUCKING *REALLY?!*

''1) general election.
2) Parliament vote for a public vote.''

W h o a

"We'll keep voting until we get it right"

I'm not sure that's an 'F' though. She has joined all the others up. It could be ''Parliament vote ( or a public vote.''

It's times like this I really wish I didn't have dyslexia.

@Poppy Rider the problem is, in the US, if you are born here, you are a citizen. And my concern is immigrants knowing English enough to past the test, then not teaching their kid English.

Hence why must an English test to be a citizen is not enough, I think to vote you need to pass an English test. That way their kids either can't vote or need to know English. They are probably more likely to speak English to start, but still.

Also, I don't think the US has an official language, and perhaps it should.

Disagree with language test. They have a history of being abused.

I think you do have an official language.

Abused how?

But, I do agree that English should be the official language.

@Poppy Rider we do not. About half the states or more do. But not the US as a whole.

ah

Should get on that.

Literacy, used to be required to vote.. But, they were written in such a way that they were impossible pass. So when a minority the test proctor did not like, they could say the failed.

If you want some thing more specific you will have to give me time to find an example.

http://www.slate.com/blogs/the_vault/2013/06/28/voting_rights_and_the_supreme_court_the_impossible_literacy_test_louisiana.html

So it's the same problem voter ID laws had.

Voter ID laws would probably be easier to pull off.

If it's impossible to pass, then even 7th gen Americans wouldn't pass, thus the problem would correct itself because no one could vote and they would be very very angry.

Also, we have computers now to do testing, so you can remove the human from parts of it.

I agree, they can be abused, but I did say everyone should have to do it. Yes, that might put mentally handicapped at a potential disadvantage, that is another problem

I agree, but if we go this route. I feel that it will be necessary to add more community resources to help those willing to learn English. If they are here legally.

I don't have a problem with that. Although I'd rather incentive it with tax deductibles than direct federal funding.

Encourage communities to fund this.

Not the government

Instead, however, the government seems to try and mandate kids learn Spanish in public schools.

Agreed

Two firemen who made video criticizing Maduro charged with hate speech crimes and face 20 years in prison.
https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/venezuela-president-nicolas-maduro-donkey-video-viral-firemen-prison-a8540911.html

"Hate speech" laws being used to silence political dissents in a socialist regime. Never thought I'd see the day.

And that is why the Racial Socialist want hate speach laws

I think most of us are vaguely aware of china's social credit score bullshit, but this very easily digestable article does a good job at going into a little more detail on how it works http://abc.net.au/news/2018-09-18/china-social-credit-a-model-citizen-in-a-digital-dictatorship/10200278?pfmredir=sm

I actually think we could soon have something like that in the West. We already have Corporate loyalty programs. I can just see corporations deciding they are going to step up to their "social responsibility" and reward behavior through such programs. Many will likely merge them as they already have.

I doubt the government would do it too explicitly (that would be too obvious) but I can totally see companies using it to push certain beliefs and behaviors that they find suitable.

like they already are?

Not quite yet. It would be far more subtle and far more influential. Right now it's "buy our product." It's becoming "support X charity." It would become "support X event"

https://www.theatlantic.com/science/archive/2018/09/dna-test-race-lawsuit/570250/

I keep wondering when people are going to get a little more skeptical about some of the genetic testing that gets sold these days. SOme of it is solid, like the best paternity tests are pretty darned good, but these long intergenerational mitochondrial DNA things have issues.

There's a few full reports on most of the DNA/ancestry testing sites. They're sketchy as fuck and not as accurate as they claim

Something about selling your DNA to 3rd parrty labs and medical facilities as I understand.

I also hear they've actually muddled with results to screw with people they didn't like.

```A reporter for the Daily Beast @KELLYWEILL, who also attended Unite the Right 2, defends Richard Spencer as "more practiced" and says he "mopped the floor with Carl Benjamin" in her latest piece.

Benjamin was debating against Spencer's racist positions.```
Was there a newer one since the one on Warski??

And yes, I have to agree with her because Carl Benjamin just outright sucked at the debate, didn't have many Arguments and was an ass, talked over Richard (who was rather calm, Carl was not).
In short: It was a trainwreck on Sargon's side and caused him to loose a ton of subs at the time.

So in short, it was bad, very bad and IMO also rather cringy. Spencer kinda won because he was calm and didn't talk (much) over the other, was rather respectful and the worst he said was "you are not as intelligent as you think you are".

yeah that was the consensus about 8 months ago

@pratel it's multifactorial. You can get your data sold to third parties, if they find a cure using your data you don't get shit, data has been stolen from some of these companies, the %'s aren't accurate, the method they use isn't that good for what they're using it for, and they might be fucking with results extra because again, they wouldn't be able to show you detailed percentages

Yeah, also. That was a good article.

I personally find it strange people dance around the 'what counts as a race" question. That's actually settled law. Back during slavery and reconstruction they asked that and decided on a 1/8th criterion and as laws tend to not get actually repealed...

It is funny when you realize people are literally fighting over the same stuff as reconstruction. We *could* just drop the whole thing. Or I guess we'll be progressive and discriminate on business contracts like it's 1870 or something. The latter case seems to be winning somehow.

Sargon didn't do very well against Spencer but Styxhexenhammer has

Yes, it would have been soo much better if Sargon would have just shut his mouth and let our Anarcho-Hippie Jesus do the Job.

The Shirtless Wonder

Hehehe, yeah 😄

@Timcast
Something for tomorrow's 2nd Channel Videos?
https://www.thelocal.se/20180914/swedish-student-whose-flight-disruption-went-viral-now-faces-charges
https://www.deutschlandfunkkultur.de/konsequenzen-nach-zivilem-ungehorsam-schwedin-droht.2165.de.html?dram:article_id=428372&xtor=AD-253-%5B%5D-%5B%5D-%5B%5D-%5Bdkultur-desktop%5D-%5B%5D-%5B%5D

He was deported after he was convicted for domestic violence btw....

https://youtu.be/c2M5vamV0N0

The important thing is that she got social justice points. That's what matters here.

lol
https://www.sbs.com.au/news/pauline-hanson-to-move-okay-to-be-white-motion

Australian Senator moves motion asking senate to acknowledge 'It's OK to be white."

fokken A

XD LOL NICE

shitposted into the upper echelons

https://www.bbc.com/news/world-latin-america-45578492

I'd love to the give congratulation to the winner of the War on Drugs, the drugs.

And the government. Both big winners.

Well, the private prisons are doing fantastic numbers...

LOL; nice :D
https://www.sbs.com.au/news/pauline-hanson-to-move-okay-to-be-white-motion

Pls that was just posted

```Today I will ask the Senate to acknowledge that it is okay to be white.```

It's time for the senate to acknowledge that the terms hamburger and sandwich can't just be used interchangeably.

Donald Trump had nothing to do with this economic boom. It was all the cocaine.

"The instant he puts up that wall, the country falls."

http://www.victoriataft.com/police-investigate-antifa-involvement-in-death-of-portlands-leo-stratton-who-reported-on-terror-group/

Does Australia really have a problem with anti-white progressives? I was under the impression that their government was pretty conservative.

Its moving there it seems

One good example is their reaction when one of their politicians suggested allowing in SA refugees

Didn't they flip their shit when Lauren Southern tried to visit?

Oh fuck...

https://rp-online.de/nrw/staedte/moenchengladbach/blaulicht/moenchengladbach-nach-leichenfund-rechte-planen-18-uhr-trauermarsch_aid-33137475

I know its German, but....

that is some serious shit....

we have some serious trouble...

*the possibility of a Civil war beginning*....

Oh and the Press is lying again.

suicide -> multiple stabbing wounds....

Translate it for us anglos?

TL;DR: The leader of the Group hooligans against salafists (Jihadists) was found dead, with multiple Stabbing Wounds.

Unfortunately nobody will care.

I dont think..

Is he famous?

Or infamous?

The members of his group might care.

and if they are armed and angry, they might kill some Jihadis

Thing is, this will only result in more ammo for the far left to use against the other side.

Nobody will care about his death

But the MSM will care about the deaths or threats towards anyone slightly foreign

Other People will....

the Group will kill Muslims, muslims will kill other Germans, probably even Police and it goes from there...

Im.. justb eing pragmatic here. It will take more than this

Hooligans stab people?

I thought they only stuck with throwing shit at each other