A lot of these stances are old as fuck

>madchatter: because destroying something is a way to control it
Learned that from Paul Atreides.

It's just that people like to destroy all nuance and present something in pure us vs them terms

Dave Rubin is just about the most G-rated family friendly guy imaginable. The only remotely controversial thing you could say about him is that he's willing to talk to anyone.

And that then causes people to think of themselves as being part of a dichotomous conflict

If the SJWs & commies would actually be willing to talk to people like Rubin they might be able to actually humanize themselves but as it stands they just come off as pod people.

They cant afford to have reasonable discussions with people as it might cause their acolytes to lose faith in the cause

@TylerC >have their OWN youtube con
Wasn't that tried and it failed because someone tried to force a code of conduct with speech restrictions?

not sure

i guess milo's berkley even miiight count

but i would see this as needing to be away from a college campus

similar to the vidcon

just with only the "undesirables" that youtube is trying to shit on

if someone hosts it, people will show up

It could work but the people organizing and backing it would have to be 100% free speech advocates who don't care about controversy.

agreed

Someone independently wealthy who doesn't give a fuck.

100% they would get targeted

not sure who would be able to pull it off other than maybe peter tiel or someone of that level

just someone on that level is all i mean

I doubt Tiel would be interested. He'd want a safe return.

same

i dont think he would care enough about it to organize it, but i could be wrong

would almost say have the NRA try to put it together

but not sure if that might automatically screw the event

but it would bring out all the freedom of speechers and the gun owners to see what in the hell is up

it's a possibility, but people who support the NRA and people who support freedom of speech aren't entirely overlapping. while most have died of old age, there are plenty of bible-thumper paleocons out there who wouldn't want to be associated with some of the folk on *the list*

I hang out on AR15.com a lot and they're split roughly 50/50 over this social media censorship stuff.

you arent wrong there, and vice versa, buuuut, it would be a hell of a show to say, we can all stand together for our rights

i find that interesting about the ar15.com forums, but not overly surprising

it wasnt too long ago the calls for censorship were from the right

Their argument is a pretty typical conservative stance of "it's a free market", "private businesses should be able to do whatever they want", "just build your own" etc. Applying boilerplate ideological answers without deeper investigation of the problem.

agreed

we are getting that from both sides currently

4. "Make the enemy live up to its own book of rules."

ya good luck with that one

lol

"Anyone who believes X position hasn't investigated the issue"
Wew

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZXLuqQe8DqQ

project veritas released a new video today about the deep state

Cringy intro, not shocking content.