Yeah its just impossible to explain that legitimately because there's no proof.

So her choices where say something and fight back and get ruined, or go along with the political indoctrination.

right

shes fighting back and she will be surrounded by eh collateral damage of that

I'm saying it's bullshit to say it's her own fault for fighting back.

I really dont think she will win the suit but Laurier will likely settle

It's victim blaming.

personal responsibility and choosing your battles

and this isnt even a pyrrhic victory

side note

Whatever buzzwords you choose to call it, atkins, it is what it is. Tim isn't making up the rules.

new merch will start appearing on my channel

beanies for everyone

If choosing your battles means keeping silent and allowing political indoctrination to go unchallenged, what battle should she have chosen to fight instead?

Just keep her head down, finish her masters, then keep her head down and stay on the PhD track, then keep her head down and try to get a professorship then keep her head down and try to get tenure to do what?

Retire?

if she wanted a PhD yes

Just keep parroting the party line?

because adults make hard choices

she chose to fight back

in that she has become unemplyable

she chose to publish the audio

she could have kept the audio and filed suit

no pbulicity

the point is

Laurier is a public university.

fight back, whatever

It should not be a political indoctrination center.

but dont blame bad PR on anyone other than the person who generated the publicity

That professors are using a public university for political purposes is wrong. It's not a case where you can just stay silent and let it happen if you want to have a functioning democracy.

It is abuse of power.

And you're saying it's OK that they abused their power.

That it's her fault.

what

need some writing to put under it

"Choose your battles"

whats this for?

the joke was supposed to be

its fake symbolism

its not a flipped pyramid like the far lefties but its knocked over

About that merchandise, will there be T-shirts with just a picture of a beanie on them?

some latin phrase would work well

and people would freak out

i can make a shirt with a beanie on it

respice in toro

thats latin for look under the couch

haha

Legi mortuus linguis

nihil hinc

Most of what I actually remember from Latin class is learning "quid facit?" And also learning infere, necare, etc before learning colors.

remember silentium victoriam accelerat?

the motto of the official office of censorship in the US

they banned women from sending their knitting to troops incase it was encoded 😛

I agree with you tim

Becoming activist against the mainstream carries social costs

It irks me when i hear about young ppl who think they are free to do activism one day and then behave as if nothing happened next day

If you choose to talk against mainstream in social sciences you need to have plan what to do after. And not expect that anyone will employ you with army of rabid sjws hounding your every move and bombarding potential employers with abuse

Imo at this point ahe could have imo disapear from public life for a while and then she would find a job or just go at it alone through internet.

Okay but i'm a cheese activist

I am pretty certain that if she crowd founded ppl would give her moneyfor any kind of research she would want to do.

yea she could havea huge patreon if she wanted

I said it before here

Right now we lack research into current culture wars

I remember that one lady who was following anonymous

I bet she made some great papers about those times

Honestly i feel sorry for future historians trying to sort out current times in the future

With articles making claims opposite each other its going to be hard find out what realy went on

thats why people who stand up and honestly say whats going on is important in these times

becaue historians only do guess work when theres nothing else to go on

if you make a record it will be used above all speculation

Well id you look how ppl work with past times its mainly mainstream media articles and talking with ppl who remember those times

Just imagine what would you think about gamergate based on mainstream media

Also consider that there will come a time when youtube starts deleting old videos

Its very hard to archive electronic medium

Something current archivist's are struggling a lot

google may be numbties but they wont delete any videos. They know the worth of what they have.

Nope they will start deleting

Its not worth the money to keep moving huge amount of data from old servers to new

Especialy videos with minimum to none activity

No they won't. At worst they will go into achieve. but be accessible upon request.

Thats extremely costly

Have you seen this?

How would you archive it

https://www.extremetech.com/extreme/160928-five-dimensional-glass-memory-can-store-360tb-per-disc-rugged-enough-to-outlive-the-human-race

That looks awesome tbh

they are not re-writable yet but you don't need them to be.

You dont

You just need them to last

Unlike cds and dvds

Or hard drives

yep. Thats what these are for.

Well i will w8 and see the cost efectivnes of it

But frankly if i were youtube exec wanting to make money

Getting rid of oldest data like vlogs from 2008 is logical thing to consider

They can't make money. thats why YT needs to be taken on as a charity for everyone on the planet.

Well even as charity current trend cant continue forever

The old servers used for data storage will need to be replaced at some point

And the more data there is the more expensive it will be

hmm a woman got drunk and mowed down someone with her car... apparently a "KKK nazi"... left is basically cheering

yep. And we're back at the same problem again. YT has a monopoly and we want a service like YT for free. Google are pricing everyone else out of the market.

I hate what my side has becoming. I apologize.

It will be interesting for sure

Right now we already have game companies who cant make remakes

https://eu.cincinnati.com/story/news/2018/06/06/nky-white-supremacist-leader-killed-crash-newport-woman-charged/678123002/

Because they lost all data of previously released game

Starcraft had that problem. They lost the source code and had to buy it off some one. something like that.

We're new to this tech stuff but there is no reason why anything should be deleted, lost or destroyed out of existence any more.

TR sent to prison with reportedly 71% Muslim population 😦

thats probably the lowest pop

any word on solitary or nah?

i wana go on sam harris podcast

what for?

as in what would you want to discuss?

@Timcast a Timcast certified beanie for merch?

I would love to see more debates.

Hes basically aethiest jordan peterson

Or maybe peterson is christian sam harris...

@Chlodovech ^^

OMG Please go on Sam Harris podcast, that would be amazing.

is there a catchy name like brexit for the vote to split california into three states yet?

cause that vote is in november

There had been something called Calexit but it's a stupid name and I don't think this is the same thing.

there has to be something about a state well known for its earthquakes spliting into thirds

if they split, is the federal govt required to accept it

All them lads at the free Tommy thingo made me think, forget what groups self identify as, forget what people 'think' they are doing and who pays who, think of the movie 'V is for vendetta', the EU is the British Government, Antifa are the fingermen, and Tommy is V

Obviously a lot else is different

But my point, Antifa are doing more to help the government's than dissolving the government's

ofc they are,

Why do you think when Antifa is concerned the police are ordered to basically look the other way

They get rid of the bad public elements for them, and they remain blameless

Every insight into antifa I have, they get worse and worse

well they do, most Antifa are idiots without a cause that wanna be revolutionary, or heroic,

And since that requires you to stand out, they keep getting worse and worse. Because someone has to set a new height to convince themselves that they are one of the hero's too

I think you just said the real issue, they want to be revolutionary, where as every revolutionary has wanted a cause more so than to be a revolutionary. They are without true cause, like a dog barking that doesn't know what it's barking at

"like a dog barking that doesn't know what it's barking at"

Wanna see a real example? Tim Pool caught a whole pack of them in this video of his from months ago

https://youtu.be/xiJVsPlZ3yw?t=9m10s

they're unknowning people that just wanna be good, and they blindly trust anyone in their midst to know it for them, so they can support "the good fight"

and that is so dangerous, because these people are then capable of monsterious manipulation in their blind zealotry to "do good"

I dunno what they just said at the ECB meeting ... but the Euro is tanking

oh I see... ECB is finally after a decade ending QE this december

id like to talk about truth, activism, media

"This report shows we are making progress" http://www.latimes.com/local/california/la-me-thefts-rise-california-20180613-story.html

"San Francisco alone recorded more than 30,000 auto burglaries last year, which authorities largely blamed on gangs"

...like MS13? the people they defend?

seriously, people still believe the left is there to help them when they do shit like this?

"drug possession, theft, shoplifting, identity theft, receiving stolen property, writing bad checks and check forgery"

i feel like some of these crimes are not at all in the same category as each-other

wait, how did i miss them lowering IDENTITY THEFT from a fucking FELONY to a god damn misdemeanor!

actually i know why they did that, because they encourage illegal immigrates to commit identity theft to pay taxes.

"While researchers can link the measure to more theft, they found it did not lead to the state's increase in violent crime.

Violent crime spiked by about 13% after Proposition 47 passed, but researchers said the trend started earlier and was mainly because of unrelated changes in crime reporting by the FBI and the Los Angeles Police Department."

convenient that when it supports the narrative they will look at trends before and after, but when it disproves gun control they just look away

this is kinda why i dont want sanfran to be part of north california 😛

"California still has historically low crime rates despite recent changes in the criminal justice system aimed at reducing mass incarceration and increasing rehabilitation and treatment programs"

i read this as "we have the lowest crime rates **when we stop arresting people for crimes**"

"The ballot measure led to the lowest arrest rate in state history in 2015 as experts said police frequently ignored crimes that brought minimal punishment."

"Offenders convicted of those crimes were about 3% less likely to be convicted of a new crime within two years, but the researchers said it's not clear if that was because they didn't commit new crimes or because they were less likely to be arrested and prosecuted because of the lower penalties."

oh, looks like i read all that correctly

guys

the Kellie marie tran story is fake news

took me like 30 seconds to figure out it was fake news too

and to think he had a freaking loooooong argument about that a week ago

There is a big grey area in 'truth in media', obviously lies are lies, wilful ignorance is what it is.. But if you research something and click links x y and z, while I research the same thing and click links a b and c, neither of us are lying, both of us would be able to say the other lied

What

A good example would be the documentary 'Human Flow', about migrants to Europe. Everything they said was factually correct, but the picture they paint is a complete lie IMO, I was in disbelief watching it, but am I to assume they know better? Should I question if I know better?

Or when Mr Tim here researchers a story, the avenues he takes, the things he makes note of, is different to what I would notice. Everyone would follow a different rabbit hole to some extent.

There's more information about Tommy Robinson

He's in Olney prison

@Timcast what was the fake news article?

tons of stories saying she deleted her instagram due to harassment

I just searched her on Google and saw it.

the first stories that came out said "KMT deleted her instagram, was it harassment?"

a couple days later it changed to

it WAS harassment

but there is still no proof

in fact an old buzzfeed article just shows tons of people praising her

and the "harassment" posted by polygon is shit like

"rose was worse than jar jar"

Uh, it's Polygon

lol

Wow. That's... wow.

right it is polygon

and even THEY are showing no real harassment

their evidence is people being like "duymb movie"

Is it weird to me that I'm starting to think that they're trying to stoke the flames to try and make actual harassment with reverse psychology?

So why did she delete her Instagram, Actually?

I don't know if that's the goal but it will 100% be the result.

the only clue as to why she did is that she has posted in the apst how she doesnt like social media

according to Pew women are harassed way less than men overall

so the anrrative about women being harassed is a myth

but you have to wonder why

well

men dont complain about harassment so no one talks about it

and men dont for two main reasons

one, they dont care

two, they will be mocked if they do

women receive was less harassment tahn men but seem to only ever talk about it

squeeky wheel gets the grease

This reminds me of how RDJ was ignored during #metoo

The pedophilia issue was only slightly brought up

Terry Crews would've been ignored, too, if he weren't always so vocal as a character.

Reddit also loves Terry.

Like I said. I'm just getting hints of it all over. I'm not saying it's the same thing.

I posted the FB post about Tommy in shitposting, if anybody is interested

Dominos is fixing roads... isn't that literally what we pay taxes for? https://jalopnik.com/dominos-is-fixing-americas-crappy-roads-for-pizza-safet-1826736405

Nah you pay taxes for government administrators and welfare

You pay them so they record the fact that you pay them and they get paid

I'm sure dominos is doing it as a publicity stunt

Not as any kind of service

And that ofc, No company is gonna roll out free fixes unless it nets them SOMETHING in profit

@Timcast if you look at that pew research it says men get more harassment but care less about it... which could mean men care less.. or it could be the harassment is different towards women, which I would lean to IMO

@wacka is this the pew research you're talking about?


http://www.pewinternet.org/2017/07/11/online-harassment-2017/

yeah looks familiar.. havent seen it in ages.. but looks the same

It states that 44% of men and 37% of women experience harrassment

It's interesting, more men support freedom of speech

yeah and women find it a major problem whereas men less so

which to me .. could signify that women get different harassment

with men it more likely of an IQ nature ... and with women its more likely a sexual nature.. (thats just my opinion)

That, Or men care less

Men rip on eachother all the time, they get thick skinned due to them knowing its just banter
Wamen don't do it, so they don't see it as banter, and instead as actual aggression

The study states women get sexualised forms of harrassment

*more women

what are you talking about? women rip each other all the time

And men receive more harrasment based on their political opinions

if anything.. they do it more 😛

yes but they do it to be mean,

Men call eachother fag in a friendly way

53% of women receives explicit images they never asked for

like how the internet people call eachother shit-lords

anyway dinner, so afk

And 21% report being sexually harassed

Online, that is

But, only 16% of men report harrassment being extremely or very upsetting, while 35% of women say the same

see if harassment to men and women was the same... my guess is, that those numbers would be similar

I think both you and Jayred are right.

and there are some things I suppose you could say to men but wouldnt say to a women... like Derg, you fat son of a bitch 😛

Men care less, and more women get sexually harassed, stuff like dickpics sent to them

probably intersects when the harassment is peronal appearance attacks.. I imagine moremen wouldnt care about that

And...it's likely the men have different standards for what counts as Sexualised abuse

but I imagine less men would say that to women

I couldn't think of any kind of online harrassment to me, that I would count as "sexualized abuse"

A guy sends a girl a dickpic, for her that's abuse. If a girl sends a guy a pic of her cunt, that rarely counted as "harrassment"

I can only guess light blue is female here?... odd not to have a key.. http://www.pewinternet.org/2017/07/11/online-harassment-2017/pi_2017-07-11_online-harassment_0-04/

so they did get the numbers for physical appearance harassment

Derg... if a bunch of women send you pics you wouldnt be bothered... how about 50 guys sending you their junk?

I would laugh it off, tbh

Like, that sort of stuff doesn't really disturb me

How about you?

it would be very anoying

especially if it wasnt filterable/blockable and sent to my work email

ok I see the point of that chart now...

wow 15% of people who witnessed (not even received) non-severe harassment stopped using the online service

imagine any time someone witness mild harassment on twitter 15% of the time quit.... there would be no users left in a week 😛

I wonder what happens if you send a guy a dick pic from a dude vs a chick a tit or vag pic from another chick. If they report that as harassment.

or sexual harassment

interesting https://twitter.com/GoodwinMJ/status/1007261170145939457?s=20