Yeah its just impossible to explain that legitimately because there's no proof.

So her choices where say something and fight back and get ruined, or go along with the political indoctrination.

right

shes fighting back and she will be surrounded by eh collateral damage of that

I'm saying it's bullshit to say it's her own fault for fighting back.

I really dont think she will win the suit but Laurier will likely settle

It's victim blaming.

personal responsibility and choosing your battles

and this isnt even a pyrrhic victory

side note

Whatever buzzwords you choose to call it, atkins, it is what it is. Tim isn't making up the rules.

new merch will start appearing on my channel

beanies for everyone

If choosing your battles means keeping silent and allowing political indoctrination to go unchallenged, what battle should she have chosen to fight instead?

Just keep her head down, finish her masters, then keep her head down and stay on the PhD track, then keep her head down and try to get a professorship then keep her head down and try to get tenure to do what?

Retire?

if she wanted a PhD yes

Just keep parroting the party line?

because adults make hard choices

she chose to fight back

in that she has become unemplyable

she chose to publish the audio

she could have kept the audio and filed suit

no pbulicity

the point is

Laurier is a public university.

fight back, whatever

It should not be a political indoctrination center.

but dont blame bad PR on anyone other than the person who generated the publicity

That professors are using a public university for political purposes is wrong. It's not a case where you can just stay silent and let it happen if you want to have a functioning democracy.

It is abuse of power.

And you're saying it's OK that they abused their power.

That it's her fault.

what

need some writing to put under it

"Choose your battles"

whats this for?

the joke was supposed to be

its fake symbolism

its not a flipped pyramid like the far lefties but its knocked over