Message from @nathan
Discord ID: 409561753521750017
🤔
this video is incredible
4 minutes in and I gave up. That faggot uses too many words to say nothing.
[important political discussion]
gay
This is some hilarious mainstream news. This guy even says "half of this country thinks the mainstream media lies" lmfao hmm I wonder. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bWRyLIrevSo
"TRUMP OVERRULES FBI OBJECTIONS"
who the fuck was elected President again?
🤣
@Reaps goddamn those "students" are so fucking retarded
On the topic of the mainstream media, I think a vast majority of the US knows the main stream media says a lot of bullshit, whether they're republican or democrat. Most people understand corruption and biased reporting is bipartisan and loved by everyone.
Everyone I know around my town doesn't trust the main stream media 100%, but maybe that's just a thing in the south.
The problem is, it normalizes flinging lies. It's the other side's responsibility to refute them.
So it's all about which side has the worst lies smeared on them.
It doesn't matter that Hillary betrayed the country, stole relief money from starving victims of disaster, harassed victims of sexual abuse, and corrupted her own party... Trump got called literally Hitler.
I think the thing Sargon says about how they could've destroyed Trump based on things he actually did is the best way to sum up the left's error with Trump in the election.
Maybe the reason we're not seeing the sane intellectuals in the USA standing up for reason is that the media is actively trying to suppress any shred of reasoned discussion.
They [the left] also picked the least charismatic candidate possible, and on top of all that shit, they went with the worst approach possible. They appealed to the progressives, the most hated political group there is. It was a shit show, and it was painful to watch unfold.
But that's a bit off topic.
It wasn't just charisma, Hillary had a very dirty baggage behind her. And she couldn't convince anyone that wasn't already ideologically possessed.
I think the media chooses different approaches based on which side of the spectrum they're on. The progressive media outlets simply pretend people with differing opinions either don't exist or are fascist, racist, Nazis; conservatives seem to do a good job illustrating that there are other opinions, however, they use very spotty evidence for many of their claims, don't look far enough into things, and act as though other opinions are stupid; and, in conclusion, they're all bad new sources.
Wait, isn't this pierce Brosnan in the last movie with Jackie Chan?
north or south korea?
I really like the point Sargon makes about diversity in his Thinkery video "Two More #Feminid Arguments: Forced Diversity and Fascist Theocrats", where he talks about not really caring about diversity as long as they don't mention "hey, did you notice we have coloreds in this movie? it's diverse!" I think that that is the best way of phrasing how to "fix" the push for diversity thesedays.
First, let's define diversity, to paraphrase Jordan Peterson.
Like, instead of focusing all your efforts in creating this diverse charcter into making them have special genitals or darker skin, you should focus on making the character interesting and then add on the black pussy afterwars
by diversity I mean representing minorities in media and such
YOU would think diversity means having all races together. THEY think diversity means non-white.
When they say "we want to reach 100% diversity", they mean "we want to have no whites."
Well, white males, since white women get a pass, sometimes.
Pasting it here because it's relevant:
>Drake says research suggests that millennials especially will spend more on brands that support causes they care about.
That was a comment from a PR guy from T-Mobile.
I'm talking about how the minorities are a harder minority in entertainment, not the silly anti-white SJW shit narrative you're talking about.