a debate on the character of God would be a debate on the Bible, if it was Pius and Fond

and that's not the same sort of debate at all

I will grant that.

It would likely be more interesting

this is a very stripped down form of evidencial apolgetics through philosphy

just ask Pius to prove god exists, that would be a good start

^^

tho if it was an actual evidencial apolgetics argument then at least it be somewhat fun

granted they still suck

what sort of evidence do you have in mind?

He challanged Fond to this debate saying he could prove it, then do so

@FrostyCrits how

that's a churlish attempt in fuility

@everyone There are 5 minutes left of open debate there will be an Q & A after please @ me with questions, who they are for and whether you would like to speak them on your mic or have me read them

I WANT PICTURES OF GO...I mean SPIDER-MAN!

@A. Spader for hypothetical conclusive evidence or evidence he could use?

yeah

loving the auto mute

As I see it, there is no way, can't prove a negitive

Former or latter?

like is this gonna be some sort of naturalist debate or something about the mark of divinity?

This whole debate is literally to jerk of egos.

*off

that's not the sort of logical argument that you can have on say, national immigration policy

^

Most of the people on Discord are Believers or Christains etc?

I actually like outlining hypothetical proofs for God. It would have been really easy to do tbh

its a philosphy major vs. what even is FondBoy?

@Peachpanther I don't think so

Where is the debate taking place?

Debate VC

^

Debate?

Lmao

Tyty

The chat in this channel is better then the debate imho 🙂 We have said more of relevance then they have

@Frenchinator too

I haven't listened to the debate

It's pretty bad.

tbf we boiled down the core of the argument that took them 25 minutes to get to in less then half a paragraph

people @ me with questions for them