Message from @ego_sum_jeffum
Discord ID: 343614608713711616
I said currency was necessary before full communism
@Katherine that is not true. Workers can be their own masters without the need for a state
Once scarcity is gone we don't need any form of currency
@Марко example?
Scarcity will never be gone, but resources can be conserved.
Revolutionary Catalonia, Paris Commune, etc
@Марко A non-worker comes to the factory and wants to use it to make a different kind of toy than the workers want. What happens?
The Ukranian Free Territory
Scarcity can be gone
Explain why you think that
And btw everything you mentioned weren't anarchist
@Katherine if he labors to make the toy then he is a worker
And thus owns the MOP along with the other workers
Rather simple
NAP
@Марко He wasn't laboring before. He came into the factory, shoved other workers aside, and began to make toys.
reminds me of ancaps
How do you "shove them aside"
Lol what
Do the other workers no longer own the factory because they were forced to stop working?
Anarchism in general
Who forced them to stop working?
The person who wanted to make a different thing who wasn't working before
We'll call them Person A
Aha, attack the capitalist, not me
Marxist-Leninists are Capitalists though (^:
haaaaaaaaaaa ^
The individual is free to individually own their own MOP if the workers of an existing factory do not wish to make the same toy as him @Katherine
All anarchists are capitalist xxxxxxddddd
I can say something ridiculous like that
And get away with it as any anarchist
MLs are state capitalists
It's not ridiculous
It's a meme
"Muh State capitalism"
In regards to Marxism Leninism it is true
You can't argue with someone who denies reality
@Марко But the individual was not a worker. He literally came into the factory, forced other workers to stop working the MoP, took that MoP (began working it), and started using it differently.
Did he magically begin to own the MoP when he started working it, while the others lost ownership?