Just because they're responsible for it doesn't mean monarchs automatically will get the best results, especially if there's nothing to punish poor performance

well

I'm not particularly religious, so that won't do much for me

Same

North Korea is pretty much a monarchy. Total rule, hereditary role, etc. And this is in modern times.

i'm a juche nationalist

jk

Ok, this is an epic idea

ffs not that again

>candace owens

Imagine if my dad was a monarch. He'd be pretty disappointed in how the monarchy turned out.

I've noticed that monarchists tend to be ultra-religious (usually Catholic) and yearning for the good old days before the Reformation when everything was orderly and theocratic. Not an attack. Just an observation. As a godless agnostic myself, I can't say that I relate

I loved it when I made her meet patrick little.

Based

@TMatthews imo monarchy and hierarchy in general is the natural order. But you can have your own opinion

Based MAGA deplorable 😎

even the old germanic and particularly slavic tribes had a leader or a "knyaz"

Real <@&488531212437159936> hours, who up?

h-howdy

the only real slavic republics were (((merchant))) republics

Huh?

I still have the role F

i'm talking about the likes of Novgorod

Lol

I did my second interview tonight but I didn't have my role changed

republics were generally trading economies

The economic system isn't based on peasant farmers so again what may have been logical then isn't anymore. I'd prefer a system that grants us social mobility so that the best and brightest can reach the top levels of society

same my man @StevePines -WA

@TMatthews i'm all for social mobility

i'm against hereditary titles that pass on just because of birthright

Monarchy does not need to mean peasant farmer economy

I support the byzantine model of sucession

Yeah...

Rome, Spain, England, Canada...monarchies

I really support the economic model of 10th century (golden age) Byzantium. I really do.

Social mobility was all but nonexistent in the feudal system, at least for the underclass.

because you're implying feudalism = monarchy

@StevePines -WA We'll have Niko do it. I technically could, but I don't know if it's over stepping my authority since I'm just the assistant to the coordinator.

feudalism is a whole differnt ballgame

I assumed that's what you meant as it was the primary form of monarchy and hierarchy for centuries

early germanic and slavic tribes were not feudal