Message from @Deleted User
Discord ID: 504185282594209792
I would argue it's immoral to bankrupt him, for he is your comrade
Agreed
and by doing yourself well you are doing him harm
I would say I'm a national capitalist. Probably the closest example in US history is Teddy Roosevelt
therefore, competition forces people to be immoral
therefore competition is a something to be avoided
>comrade
>nazbol
Meh... idk
>comrade
>his actual name is NPC#504478
Competition is inevitable because the laws of supply and demand are inevitable. Trying to avoid it is utopian fantasizing
Yup^
but the state has to minimize
because it makes people immoral
and develop vice
The only goods transferred should be military issue. Economics itself is a vice
@DairyMaxx juche gang?
I'll say the answer is inbetween, god forbid you call me out as a... *centrist*.
that's handwavy
where is in between then
I don't think it's immoral to want more business to go to you. Now if you were to sabotage your competition, that's one thing, but barring that, competition incentivizes providing a better product in hopes of winning customers
Things that cannot be avoided:
Competition,
Supply and demand,
And
Greed (human nature regardless of tribe)
^^
so we have 2 things that are vices, and instead of fighting them we'll jsut accept them
sounds like a slippery slope into the modern world tbqh
And competition is what leads to growth. minimizing it is a bad idea. Letting it go rampant, is also a bad idea.
The system has to abide by human nature
human nature cannot be one of vice
I'm still pretty undecided on economics
Growth is over rated. We need stability
^
If you consider greed vice, then it is
I'm ripe for converting to your favorite system
@YourFundamentalTheorum Vice is inextricably human
would you not agree that grid is vice?
*greed
feel free to proselytize to me
@Jacob national syndicalism is best
it measures economic status by how many cows you have
it seems pretty cool
A mixed market economy is the best way forward imo along with an identitarian state