Message from @Gregory Malchuk
Discord ID: 448951585469366282
Link one paper
circumsicse this
@NobleManWithABigHeart
A 1995 Australian condom sizing study found that circumcision in infancy reduces both true girth (intuitively) and (rather surprisingly) length of the adult penis.
The Bossio study inadvertently admitted that intact men are the happiest cohort.
WTF
Where is this Australia study I can’t find t
https://twitter.com/elonmusk/status/999355619390865408
Elongated Muskrat is goin Hamtaro
BATTLEFIELD 5 CUCKED
@Gregory Malchuk Plenty Of evidence out there
not surprised Coming from DICE, DICE is a Swedish company
They're all cucked
Exclusive Preorder character : Gimp Bitch
all of EA is run by fanatic progressives and feminists
out and open
@NobleManWithABigHeart
Indeed. But at the end of the day, I don't need a damn study to justify male human rights to physical integrity.
@Gregory Malchuk “This study indicates that neonatal circumcision is not associated with changes in penile sensitivity and provides preliminary evidence to suggest that the foreskin is not the most sensitive part of the penis.”
Literally from Bossio
Even anecdotally I’ve know uncircumcised men to carry themselves with an aura that is largely absent in their circumcised counterparts
@NobleManWithABigHeart HAHA WHAT DOES THIS EVEN MEAN?
@shinjitsu
That is one of the Bossio studies that tested sensitivity, not the one I am talking about. And they only probed the OUTSIDE of the foreskin, which is laughable.
Lolololololololololol
"an aura that is largely absent" can we have a faggot-to-english translation please
@Barry N. Terdastein Basically a level of confidence and even, dare I say it, nobility that you just don’t find in the average post circ
Ok you lost me there
"protocols assessed touch and pain thresholds and warmth detection and heat pain thresholds at a control site (forearm) and three to four penile sites (glans penis, midline shaft, proximal to midline shaft,** and foreskin**, if present)." @Gregory Malchuk
@NobleManWithABigHeart
So
A: they were more chad than u
B: And you saw their dick?
wrong
foreskin was tested in that exact study
@shinjitsu
They were probing the outside. I have a forekskin right here. You want me to probe mine right now?
What do you mean 'the outside'
@NobleManWithABigHeart
Sounds like youre admiring Bulls too much
as in not pulling back
?
@shinjitsu
The foreskin retracts. The inside is an extremely soft and sensitive mucous membrane.
Fucking Boomer
So you're saying the testing was done without pulling back the foreskin and doing the testing underneath?
and fortgay ruins Battlefield
NO COUNTERSIGNALING FORTNITE
@shinjitsu
Suppisedly. Sorrells et. al made an attempt to measure these regions and found them quite sensitive.