Okay fine then I didn’t know that but when people hear it, that’s not what they think is meant by fgm

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=suLJJplFSQU listen to this, patrick little is much more intelligent and viable than Nehlen

fellas do we really expect muzzies to do it scientifically

People who knee-jerk say "FGM is worse" are operating on feminist horror propaganda.

he quotes lots of facts and stats and historical events

Wrong. Most people understand fgm to be a literal removal of the clitoris

Which I guess you could say in a roundabout way may be feminist horror propaganda but it’s a bit of a stretch

More like Israeli anti Muslim propaganda

time to start putting people to death for circumcision

An uncircumcised man tends to have more confidence than his circumcised counterpart, controlling for all other factors of course

Where is that research

the virgin doubter

He says “controlling for other factors” as if there is research on this, so I’m simply saying show me the research

It is true that intact men are happier with their status than any other group. Men circumcised in infancy had the least satisfaction.

Uncircumcised men tend to be longer and wider as well

Any research noble?

Indeed

I have at least seen Greg back what he says up

Plenty of peer reviewed research h

Link one paper

circumsicse this

@NobleManWithABigHeart
A 1995 Australian condom sizing study found that circumcision in infancy reduces both true girth (intuitively) and (rather surprisingly) length of the adult penis.

The Bossio study inadvertently admitted that intact men are the happiest cohort.

WTF

Where is this Australia study I can’t find t

https://twitter.com/elonmusk/status/999355619390865408
Elongated Muskrat is goin Hamtaro

BATTLEFIELD 5 CUCKED

@Gregory Malchuk Plenty Of evidence out there

not surprised Coming from DICE, DICE is a Swedish company

They're all cucked

Exclusive Preorder character : Gimp Bitch

all of EA is run by fanatic progressives and feminists

out and open

@NobleManWithABigHeart
Indeed. But at the end of the day, I don't need a damn study to justify male human rights to physical integrity.

@Gregory Malchuk “This study indicates that neonatal circumcision is not associated with changes in penile sensitivity and provides preliminary evidence to suggest that the foreskin is not the most sensitive part of the penis.”

Literally from Bossio

Even anecdotally I’ve know uncircumcised men to carry themselves with an aura that is largely absent in their circumcised counterparts

@NobleManWithABigHeart HAHA WHAT DOES THIS EVEN MEAN?

@shinjitsu
That is one of the Bossio studies that tested sensitivity, not the one I am talking about. And they only probed the OUTSIDE of the foreskin, which is laughable.

Lolololololololololol