Southrons are real. Midwest Amerikaners are real. Urban Yankees are real. Northnecks are real.

Mormons are real

Probably too obscure to gain any support tbh

Well, if you knew what that was, it wouldn't be obscure, would it?

@Jacob ha ha true

No @Jacob. Regional Identities mean so little when compared to race. There may be trivial things we can talk about such as food preferances and such but those mean so little when there are large corporations feeding us nationwide regardless. IDBOLGANG

GANG GANG

Regional identities would just cause more bad than good imo

@Sam Anderson Agreed, it's already difficult enough to spread our ideas, let alone narrow them down even more

But ya you might be right. It seems like a lot of people who care about these obscure regional identities are liberals who are using it as an excuse to deconstruct race. @Sam Anderson

@fgtveassassini disagree

Irish v Italians is what I see, unless I;m misinterperting the question

no I'm talking about ethnic groups even more obscure than that

Me and Trayvonn both like Chic Fil A rascism btfo

like Kashubians

You're missing the religious components. Those will cause violence.

my dad actually talked about getting a Kashubian tattoo lmao

There is a religious component I agree but I'm just a bit cautious to categorize white people further when we're already in the situation we're in

Right now the greater tribe is under attack, and the defense of the whole is most important now

Without the whole there can be no subgroups

Well, people aren't just white.

I think Mormons, Amish and Quebecois are the most distinct whites in North America. Southrons are less so, but more distinct than the (also real) distinctions outside the south

Christianity is Kantian in its values. It thinks that all people are the same and equal. This is why it leads to such things as missionaries going abroad and marrying primitves.

I once argued with a guy who ONLY cared about his particular nationality and didn't care if Europe goes to shit

I think that's dumb

I dont think mormons are that different.

Mormons can be great people.

At least not the Utah variety I'm familiar with.

All of the mormons I've met were good people. Quality white folks who just have some funny ideas about God and worship.

@Sam Anderson I don't totally believe that's correct. There are many passages in the Bible to back up identitarianism, and I also argue it largely depends on the Christian denomination/church

Their values and morals are good.

I'm not even 100% on my view on this but I'm worried that if we divide oursleves more, even if we had a 90% white country thered be conflict among ethnic groups for a dominant culture, might be a stupid way to view it but I'm the king of blackpilling myself

As a regretful atheist I do not care how silly some things are. Just make a functioning society

Mormons are insular, have a unique faith, nepotistic in business, and the white ones come from a very narrow genetic founding stock. They can be great but they are definitely their own ethnos within the larger white collective. Just like Amish and Quebecois/Acadians

PLS send links would be good Boomer fodder. @Nico The Great - CA

Mormons are also very in tune with their Mormon specific history. More than White Americans are to American history

These aren't criticisms. We should all be a little more like mormons

@Sam Anderson One of the first things that comes to mind is the story of Babylon. It perfectly explains the degeneracy of a multicultural society and that God intended to break up humanity into unique peoples

Ohh the tower of Babyl is a good anecdote

Mormons also REQUIRE all families to have a full year of food and supplies in every family home. Good practice

https://biblicisminstitute.wordpress.com/ is a great source to use trying to redpill boomers