Message from @Norman
Discord ID: 791813192442576936
Like said their axioms
If you have objective morals, you can still kill
if morality is not objective, then you cant claim it is based around your society. by what standard do you determine it is morally right to follow the society's morals?
No
what
so then
Thats not a moral question
That's an incoherent word soup
is it morally acceptable to steal
Jesus christ you are so bad at this
yes/no
yes/no
Yes cuh!
saying your proposition again isnt an argument
If their definitive principle saying its not @Norman
use real words
not of that kantian bullshit
@Norman is the idea that it's wrong to steal fundamental to the universe or was it given to you from society
That's the question
You have to ontologically prove that moral axioms are universal and falsifiable @Norman
Not whether something is good or bad or if you should do it
no i dont
yes you do
no
i dont
You're trying to debate which actions are moral, not where morals come from
Otherwise your propositions are normatively vacuous
no
You're missing the question
they dont have to be "falsifiable"
guy thinks “haha morals is when bad n good stuff is legal shit”
it is possible for there to be a truth which we cannot determine empiraclly
Your referring to ethics
what?
What is truth
Is it ethical to steal
Bleach and I were trying to have an adult discussion
Norman please
what morals is correct is a statement