That's the question
no
You have to ontologically prove that moral axioms are universal and falsifiable @Norman
Not whether something is good or bad or if you should do it
no i dont
yes you do
i dont
You're trying to debate which actions are moral, not where morals come from
Otherwise your propositions are normatively vacuous
You're missing the question
they dont have to be "falsifiable"
guy thinks “haha morals is when bad n good stuff is legal shit”
it is possible for there to be a truth which we cannot determine empiraclly
Your referring to ethics
what?
What is truth
Is it ethical to steal
Bleach and I were trying to have an adult discussion
Norman please
what morals is correct is a statement
"adult"
you mean bullshit one
"its adult to say morality doesnt exist"
you came here spouting illogical retardation
Put that in your philosophy thesis my guy
I'm sure they'll love it at Oxford
just because you are pea brained
doesnt mean what i say is wrong
>robolx dabbing pfp
Aight mate
"haha im smart because i dont think its wrong to kill"
Not my claim
Me when someone unironically has "Democracy" as their role
every time some1 loses a debate w/ me, they bring this upo
thats why i have the pfp
baits people easily
Im saying the axiomatic morals that are proposed are not universally confounded
why
Ok Norman. I agree it's wrong to kill
