Message from @Syllogistic
Discord ID: 791813056073564180
Morality is your assessment of a things "goodness" or "badness"
A subjective moral system is one where the things that shape personal, societal, and cultural morals are not inherent to the universe
Objective morality is one where morals are inherent to the universe
Spinoza is
I didn’t claim you were
Not that you can choose to not follow them
You can choose to not follow objective morals as well
Morality doesn’t have to operate in practicality
Like said their axioms
If you have objective morals, you can still kill
if morality is not objective, then you cant claim it is based around your society. by what standard do you determine it is morally right to follow the society's morals?
No
what
so then
Thats not a moral question
That's an incoherent word soup
is it morally acceptable to steal
Jesus christ you are so bad at this
yes/no
yes/no
Yes cuh!
saying your proposition again isnt an argument
use real words
not of that kantian bullshit
@Norman is the idea that it's wrong to steal fundamental to the universe or was it given to you from society
That's the question
no
You have to ontologically prove that moral axioms are universal and falsifiable @Norman
Not whether something is good or bad or if you should do it
no i dont
yes you do
no
i dont
You're trying to debate which actions are moral, not where morals come from
Otherwise your propositions are normatively vacuous
no
You're missing the question
they dont have to be "falsifiable"
guy thinks “haha morals is when bad n good stuff is legal shit”
it is possible for there to be a truth which we cannot determine empiraclly
Your referring to ethics