you are the one playing games

you want to some things and not others, so say its subjective but act like its objective

if they are subjective, there is NO REASON not to "change" your morals to allow anything

completely irrational and arbitrary

lol

Lmao of course this Spinoza guy is a Jew

Study epistemology please

Im not a jew phaggot

Getting your morality from Jews <:emoji_75:771477695430393916>

Morality is your assessment of a things "goodness" or "badness"

A subjective moral system is one where the things that shape personal, societal, and cultural morals are not inherent to the universe

Objective morality is one where morals are inherent to the universe

Spinoza is

I didn’t claim you were

Not that you can choose to not follow them

You can choose to not follow objective morals as well

Morality doesn’t have to operate in practicality

Like said their axioms

If you have objective morals, you can still kill

if morality is not objective, then you cant claim it is based around your society. by what standard do you determine it is morally right to follow the society's morals?

No

what

so then

Thats not a moral question

That's an incoherent word soup

is it morally acceptable to steal

Jesus christ you are so bad at this

yes/no

yes/no

Yes cuh!

saying your proposition again isnt an argument

If their definitive principle saying its not @Norman

use real words

not of that kantian bullshit

@Norman is the idea that it's wrong to steal fundamental to the universe or was it given to you from society

GG @WMLC, you just advanced to level 3!

That's the question

no

You have to ontologically prove that moral axioms are universal and falsifiable @Norman

Not whether something is good or bad or if you should do it

no i dont

yes you do