old people only watch cable

They getting it from both sides now.

true

its fox or cnn

Both trash in my humble opinion

maybe but point is if they going away from fox ... its cnn or something

unless they decentralize and gtfo cable

but I wouldn't _bet _ on fox dying

maybe trump will start a cable network /s

that would be the kicker

If I was in AZ, I wouldn't count another vote until Maricopa was done.

what difference does the order make

They won't know how many more to "find"

lol

@Reaper294 He's got his Transition team moving already because he knew the outcome beforehand

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=h6mJw50OdZ4

https://youtu.be/FrJui5d7BrI

https://www.judicialwatch.org/deep-dive/new-docs-biden/

I have a question - could AOC or Washington Post's Jennifer Rubin be held accountable in any way for trying to incite civil unrest for comments that they have been making about keeping lists of Trump supporter names and calling for them to be essentially blacklisted?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wSnEOxHFytI

This is a very clear example, a vote challenger who was actually there counting votes and witnessed this bullshit.

@Bill Givens maybe tag Robert with that Q

@leftingfighter33 I feel like witnesses like this are great to get the process going but at the end of the day there still needs to be evidence of the fraud that took place or some kind of audit trail of which ballots are fraudulent. My fear is that it will be hard to grab that evidence and that they wont be able to track down fraudulent ballots

I think it should be easy

because you could just recount these with auditors

such a high rate of "good ballots" would be a giant red flag

@realz - great idea, thanks

and if they failed to get rid of bad ballots, that would be direct evidence

@RobertGrulerEsq could AOC or Washington Post's Jennifer Rubin be held accountable in any way for trying to incite civil unrest for comments that they have been making about keeping lists of Trump supporter names and calling for them to be essentially blacklisted?

um about that video, he calls it ballot harvesting, but that is not what ballot harvesting is

Ya you would have evidence that all these ballots shouldnt have mad it through but i think people would have an issues if you just started invalidating ballots just because "it seems fishy"

you may or may not be able to invalidate it

the courts will agree with you that something fraudulent is happening

the question is what is the remedy

the answer might be a recount,

but if not a recount, you could do the house thing

there are several things the house can do to invalidate entire states or just pick the president directly

if you can convince every state delegation that fraud was happening

Would a possible remedy be "any vote received after 11:59:59 of Nov. 3rd will not count"?

that isn't the type of fraud he is talking about

that isn't fraud at all; that is just dependent on court decisions made and to come