I'm not comfortable with North Carolina and Georgia still unconfirmed with a spread that virtually can't be overcome by the candidate who's trailing.

Just saw this on his FB page. Something isn't right here, if this is true that is.

Definitely requires more research on my part. Whoops haha 😅

Having a tough time finding the totals for same-day registration for WI

awww 😦

Fair.

My gut is telling me there's some fishy business going on still.

Were people filling out ballots with sharpies?

Blockchain voting? I haven't heard of that before

Is it secure and reliable?

And most importantly, proven

Well darn

What are the arguments against voter id?

It sounds like a smart thing to have

Driver's Licenses are valid forms of ID in darn near any other capacity

State IDs also count to a degree

Not to mention Military IDs

I don't see how the implications have any grounds to stand on. Especially with the multiple forms of valid State/Federal IDs that you get eventually

@realz fair haha. Guess I need to do some internet browsing to try and find any logical grounds for not having voter ID

Yeah that's a bit ridiculous. Bureaucracy at its finest haha.

PA is a little annoying (current resident). Not on New York levels though

@TacitusKilgore they absolutely could. I wouldn't imagine it to be very hard to lay out some general rules that aply to everyone

I'd normally question how you can subject someone to such conditions but the Stanford Experiment (I believe that's what it was) answers the question.

Apparently there is some very shady goings-on happening in Detroit, Michigan polling areas and a handful of other counties including sharpies being used to fill in ballots. I know the sharpies thing has been mentioned already but idk the context behind it.

It very well wouldn't have to go to the SCOTUS if the SCOTUS ruled on earlier cases instead of splitting and not hearing them, but hindsight is 20/20. Now this nightmare instance will, more than likely, force the SCOTUS to make a ruling on existing voter laws or specific instances.

@TheParamedicGamer I'm watching Crowder and he's receiving tweets from individuals who are reporting being handed sharpies and instructions on how to fill out ballots with the sharpies in other states. Giving specific locations too

Yeah idk what the other state-specific rules are regarding sharpies but it is suspect at the least.

To me it is suspect

Those jumps in votes you mean?

I agree. Those are very suspect and should be major red flags for vote integrity.

Mmhmm

But let's be real, if it isn't affecting your candidate, it doesn't matter.

At least that seems to be the status quo

I would like to agree to all the above, but the past 4-5 years, through my observations, haven't provided enough evidence to convince me.

The polarization in politics has kicked into high gear and the effects are now showing up.

Agreed

True. He doesn't have any notable policies either except for the 1994 crime bill and maybe some others I'm not yet aware of. But I didn't find out about that until the past few months myself.

I hope they aren't that partisan to ignore very concerning signs that the voting and vote counting process has issues.

Wholeheartedly agree on that. Media is the single biggest propaganda/wielder of power over the people's opinions and thought processes.

And like you said; when your information is curated, your democracy is dying.

Sounds like some Gangs of New York stuff going on

Boss Tweed era shenanigans

I saw that too as it was breaking on Crowder. More red flags throwing the vote process integrity into question

Has anyone heard about AZ's top law enforcement official being concerned enough to open up an inquiry into all the reports about sharpies being used for ballots?

I know the sharpie thing is getting old and all.

What I read was that there was enough collective worry that some votes were "rejected, spoiled, or cancelled" die to use of sharpies. If the AZ AG already covered it then cool. When was that statement released?

Okey dokes. Then probably just rehashed information.

That's...that's unconstitutional. Cruel and inhumane punishment hahaha

I know haha. I read about in paralegal class

Has anyone come across individuals who find the actions taken by Kyle Rittenhouse are unjustified and, for all intents and purposes, murder? Or does this belong in the rittenhouse channel?

Not sure if the rittenhouse channel is for any news relating to him or conversations about his incident.

Okey dokes. Then I'll be reposting in there haha

Has anyone come across individuals who find the actions taken by Kyle Rittenhouse are unjustified and, for all intents and purposes, murder?

What were their arguments?

I just got into one and the way the guy limited the facts was...perplexing to say the least

The guy used that one

Also used the curfew one

The "looking for trouble" was used too

Even after all that, I presented evidence to back up my points (including some of the law videos) and they still focused on irrelevant and highly limiting points

Even had a current LEO come in who basically made comments that supported what i was saying (though not as direct, he is a LEO after all), and they treated what he said as gospel truth.

I know there are people who think or argue using such fallible points, but I wouldn't have imagined so many.

How do you think his case will go though? I believe he won't be charged.

As much as I can when I can. I miss his tuesday videos because of legal classes

That is true. But homicide requires intent doesn't it?

At least according to statutes

Care to share a link please?

That works

@realz thanks for the link

I need links to these videos ladies and gents haha

I'm with @realz here. gibs me all da links

Yeah there were so many flaws in what went on and how it was guided. Still a pretty hard lesson on what people do when given almost unlimited power over others

I want to know how a State do hardcore into fracking/natural gas/oil (PA) flipped blue? Like, why would you willingly vote for a guy who has said, on multiple occasions no less, that he would ban/remove/eliminate the fracking and oil industry? It'll doesn't make sense.

It's upsetting that people in cities can't see that eliminating industries that provide energy (much cleaner energy in the case of natural gas) is detrimental to *everyone*.

I'd rather he outright ban than force an industry to a backwards crawl in function

What do you think the aftermath could/will be if Trump wins the legal battles following this election?

@Doc hahaha. I can see Kamala being POTUS via 25th amendment, which was already mentioned by Pelosi. We'll see though. Definitely will be a hard-fought legal battle in the next month-and-a-half.

Here's something I heard the other day about these lawsuits; what if Trump and his legal team don't pursue voter fraud as intensely as we've seen, but instead shift direction to voter impropriety? Attempt to prove that the accuracy of votes counted is in question due to the change in state laws prior to this election.

Think that will be easier to prove or be easier to legally pursue?

I would assume the remedy would be votes received after election day either don't count or must be separated in the future, and there must be clear, concise, and reasonable procedure sin place for observers/watchers.

I came across an argument made on FB that I'll share here when I find it. Sites federal law too. Wait one.

"What is your assessment of this analysis?👇🏻

This is NOT a “voter fraud” issue as much as it is a “voting fraud” issue perpetuated by Democrat-controlled states to circumvent the requirements of USC 3 Sec 1 - Appointing Electors.

USC 3 Sec 1 requires Electors to be appointed ON Election Day. For Electors to be appointed ON Election Day, votes must be RECEIVED (NOT MERELY POSTMARKED) BY Election Day.

This is codified in FEDERAL LAW!

USC 3 Sec 2 provides that a State which has HELD such an election (for the appointment of Electors ON Election Day) can subsequently count votes that are RECEIVED (not merely postmarked) BY Election Day if they cannot count them on Election Day.
The states have the prerogative to run their own elections (procedural issue) and have their citizens waste their votes by allowing votes to be POSTMARKED BY Election Day - but the only ones that count (substantive issue) are the ones RECEIVED BY Election Day!
The State can run its elections procedurally however it likes as long as it does not conflict with the federal requirement that Electors be appointed ON Election Day.
Classic Federalism /Federal Preemption.
There is no articulable way that an Elector can be appointed ON Election Day on the basis of votes RECEIVED AFTER Election Day.

NET RESULT:
Any votes RECEIVED after the polls close on Election Day are NOT COMPLIANT for the purpose of appointing Electors under FEDERAL LAW (USC 3 SEC 1) EVEN IF the they are’s compliant under applicable STATE LAW - REGARDLESS of whether the State Legislature legislatively extended the deadline or not.
Disqualify ALL mail-in ballots received AFTER Election Day - (1) regardless of its postmark date and (2) regardless of whether the State Legislatire extended the deadline or not.
Either one is violative of the governing FEDERAL statute (USC 3 Sec 1) regarding the appointment of Electors for the purpose of electing the President of the United States."

It uses law.cornell.edu as the source for federal law cited

https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/369120307430162442/775102629486526464/image0.gif

Just came across this in a separate Discord server. Politics channel specifically

I think someone in here has a background in data analysis yeah?

So that 4chan bit is, more or less, bunk?

He is also the first president (in modern American History at least) to oversee major peace deals in the volatile Middle East between nations that have warred against each other for millenia (earning 2 Nobel Peace Prize nominations along the way). I don't like the 2-party system as it is one of the most detrimental things our government has become, but between the two...Trump and the Republican party appear to be the better choice.

The Repubs at least hold ideals and beliefs that aren't destructive or regressive, and have a solid foundation. The Dems may have at one time, but after the past 4-ish years (and the past 6 months especially), they need to unf*** themselves.

Yeah.

Would a possible remedy be "any vote received after 11:59:59 of Nov. 3rd will not count"?

Wouldn't that type of purchase, if proven, be considered a "straw" or "straw hat" purchase? I do believe those types of purchases are illegal. In PA i know they are illegal.

Since his incident wasn't a hunting exception, could he still be charged with the "unlawful possession of a deadly weapon by a minor" charge in Wisconsin? It's a misdemeanor but would it still fall under the particular statute since he is a minor and he was in possession of a deadly weapon? If Robert already covered it then I probably missed it.

Fair

"Any citizen of the United States, wherever he may be, who, without authority of the United States, directly or indirectly commences or carries on any correspondence or intercourse with any foreign government or any officer or agent thereof, with intent to influence the measures or conduct of any foreign government or of any officer or agent thereof, in relation to any disputes or controversies with the United States, or to defeat the measures of the United States, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than three years, or both."

That's the Logan Act wording. Do his actions go against this?

I would like to say yes but integrity and politics go together like oil and water.

🎶 *It always feels like somebody's watching me*🎶

Needs the link. Must haves the link. Gibs me it hahaha

Getting ready for that one

@event_seen funny video by the way. Found it and had a good laugh while watching

That was great

Dude wasn't even ready or prepared for the question