Message from @nachik
Discord ID: 780582818778316810
@realz I said curious what happened to. There was one blurb in the news in the mid 90's about Clinton getting a massive donation from the PRC through a SEA company after letting them have satellite tech important to our national security. That happened. But the report of it simply disappeared.
Every one of those claims have not stood up under scrutiny, so far, once the claims and affidavits have been filed.... with one exception. I find Susan Voyles credible, but I think there are possible reasonable explanations for what she attested to. Even if what she described was found to be true - at most it reveals less than a 100 ballots being affected and provides a reason to explore if it was more widespread. Other than her, I don't think any of the others are believable.
we have a buffoon PM who claims to be a libertarian and is actually the most authoritarian PM in history
So far...
and a Pakistani mayor who loathes Britain
@nachik That would be my assessment as well, and I am watching from Missouri.
Define loathe
er who's the PM now?
Bojo (Boris Johnson)
mmm
he claims to be libertarian ? đź‘€
Even so... the only one that matters is the court of law.
Alexander Boris de Pfeffel Johnson
does that mean the same thing that libertarian means in the US?
yea he's a fraud
because of how he's handling Covid?
not going to derail this from <#771201221145919499> though (Robert nearly starting)
omg its 7
Boris Johnson seems to be a fair weather friend - at least the way he is portrayed here. Is that accurate?
@TaLoN132 When the pitchforks and torches come out, the opinion of the court of law does not matter.
Anarchy here!
If it gets to that point, there really is none any more...
Agreed. And it is on the edge of that point.
And dysfunctional cabinet.
Am I the only one that thinks the response to Covid has been the largest can of stupid ever opened?
On both sides.
@Whithers they should, gulianni said the courts decide elections. This is what people on the right have been saying. Are you saying they would go back on that if the courts decide against them?
The Left are domestic enemies of the Constitution. They can never be accepted as our rulers under any conditions for any reason. And NO, the courts do not decide the election. They decide if the protocols, policies, and procedures of Constitutional law have been violated. The Congress decides the election.
TTYL
The constitution sowed the seeds of it's own destruction.
This just sounds like kicking the can down the road
I remember clearly trumps own lawyer saying “courts decide elections”
After he said “all the networks!” Which was hilarious
lol Robert thought it was a joke
(re: broadcast)
timestamp?