Message from @JD~Jordan

Discord ID: 783568363355766786


2020-12-02 05:37:52 UTC  

Evidence should be backed by facts to the extent of holding up in court specific cases of fraud would be cool

2020-12-02 05:38:32 UTC  

Here ya go... this TRUMP appointed Judge says it better than I can
"One might expect that when seeking such a startling outcome, a plaintiff would come formidably armed with compelling legal arguments and factual proof of rampant corruption, such that this Court would have no option but to regrettably grant the proposed injunctive relief despite the impact it would have on such a large group of citizens. That has not happened," Brann added. "Instead, this Court has been presented with strained legal arguments without merit and speculative accusations, unpled in the operative complaint and unsupported by evidence."

https://www2.ca3.uscourts.gov/opinarch/203371np.pdf

2020-12-02 05:38:48 UTC  

Loke they say we believe Biden votes each count 1.2 each and Trump only .8

2020-12-02 05:39:03 UTC  

Ok so why does a hand recount match the vote totals

2020-12-02 05:39:10 UTC  

The lower judge excluded the evidence from the brief

2020-12-02 05:39:19 UTC  

Lol. Federalist society judges aren't Trump friendly.

2020-12-02 05:39:28 UTC  

He may have been duped

2020-12-02 05:39:33 UTC  

That ruling was upheld on appeal... try again

2020-12-02 05:39:38 UTC  

So far there is no evidence of wide spread fraud that could overturn the elections . All we have is statistical modeling that is heavily dependent on the variable you start with (subjective starting inputs). Some models like shivas can be used to show republicans cheated using the same methods he used. It’s very weak evidence of wide spread fraud @JonasRobert

2020-12-02 05:39:44 UTC  

They say oh Iran logged in and flipped 1000 votes ok why does the paper ballots match

2020-12-02 05:39:51 UTC  

Why not listen to all the hours of testimony at the hearings for evidence and that the voting machines that are wiped of the evidence

2020-12-02 05:40:07 UTC  

Shiva's a grifter

2020-12-02 05:40:14 UTC  

I know @DrSammyD

2020-12-02 05:40:18 UTC  

@Repeat thanks for linking that

2020-12-02 05:40:31 UTC  

I don't know... I think there are issues with what he is saying. The company he claims to work for only has 15 employees on LinkedIn. https://www.linkedin.com/company/electionsource/people/

2020-12-02 05:40:32 UTC  

He accused his gop opponent in a election of the very same thing. @DrSammyD

2020-12-02 05:40:37 UTC  

Wiped of evidence of what?

2020-12-02 05:40:55 UTC  

I'm not taking the position that there is or isn't sufficient evidence at this time. I'm trying to get someone to describe what sufficient evidence WOULD look like. So far, no one can do that.

2020-12-02 05:40:55 UTC  

You are making assumptions and speculations... that is not evidence

2020-12-02 05:41:27 UTC  

IT DEPENDS.... there are lots of things that could be evidence. Do you have any or not?

2020-12-02 05:41:39 UTC  

Gotta love Parler lol

2020-12-02 05:41:52 UTC  

If you do audits and the audits match the vote counts but you said there was ftsud and theres no explanation why the audit came out right what kind of audits are required to prove it

2020-12-02 05:42:06 UTC  

Parler... for your Cult Trump News

2020-12-02 05:42:34 UTC  

I want YOU (or someone else) to simply give an example of the minimum level of evidence required to convince you lol. Obviously what is available thus far has not convinced you.

2020-12-02 05:42:38 UTC  

No, just for the news that main stream media doesn’t share🤣

2020-12-02 05:42:39 UTC  

@Repeat, you just advanced to level 17!

2020-12-02 05:43:01 UTC  

Something solid , I mean they are the ones claiming they have evidence of widespread vote fraud . So far none of the evidence checks out . So perhaps whatever they can provide that can’t be refuted. So far there are perfectly good reasons to refute and rebuff most of the evidence presented and the rest so far is unverifiable. @JonasRobert and not really wide spread

2020-12-02 05:43:18 UTC  

Ive told you. Like 3 times now. I will take that to mean you know you have no reliable evidence

2020-12-02 05:43:20 UTC  

okay...what would you consider "something solid"?

2020-12-02 05:43:42 UTC  

Remember the Trump Legal Team having failed miserably in court is seeking to discard millions of votes or flat out throw out the entire election so when you say why block then from gaining access to dig through the entire core results why would we not want them on a short leash

2020-12-02 05:43:50 UTC  

CNN got outed today btw

2020-12-02 05:44:02 UTC  

who cares

2020-12-02 05:44:05 UTC  

Wonder who’s next🤔

2020-12-02 05:44:38 UTC  

anyone that would rely on CNN or FOX deserves being made a fool

2020-12-02 05:45:03 UTC  

@JonasRobert something they present that can’t be refuted. I don’t know what evidence for wide spread voter fraud would be. They are they ones claiming they have the evidence for it . The dominion machine thing would be a start but so far all of it is extremely conspiratorial and out there.

2020-12-02 05:45:11 UTC  

Lol we’ve had This debate already.

2020-12-02 05:45:36 UTC  

Yeppers I know... talking to @Repeat

2020-12-02 05:45:50 UTC  

@JD~Jordan outed for what

2020-12-02 05:45:58 UTC  

who knows who cares