Message from @james j
Discord ID: 783569402254589953
He accused his gop opponent in a election of the very same thing. @DrSammyD
Wiped of evidence of what?
I'm not taking the position that there is or isn't sufficient evidence at this time. I'm trying to get someone to describe what sufficient evidence WOULD look like. So far, no one can do that.
You are making assumptions and speculations... that is not evidence
IT DEPENDS.... there are lots of things that could be evidence. Do you have any or not?
Gotta love Parler lol
If you do audits and the audits match the vote counts but you said there was ftsud and theres no explanation why the audit came out right what kind of audits are required to prove it
Parler... for your Cult Trump News
I want YOU (or someone else) to simply give an example of the minimum level of evidence required to convince you lol. Obviously what is available thus far has not convinced you.
No, just for the news that main stream media doesn’t share🤣
@Repeat, you just advanced to level 17!
Something solid , I mean they are the ones claiming they have evidence of widespread vote fraud . So far none of the evidence checks out . So perhaps whatever they can provide that can’t be refuted. So far there are perfectly good reasons to refute and rebuff most of the evidence presented and the rest so far is unverifiable. @JonasRobert and not really wide spread
Ive told you. Like 3 times now. I will take that to mean you know you have no reliable evidence
okay...what would you consider "something solid"?
Remember the Trump Legal Team having failed miserably in court is seeking to discard millions of votes or flat out throw out the entire election so when you say why block then from gaining access to dig through the entire core results why would we not want them on a short leash
CNN got outed today btw
who cares
Wonder who’s next🤔
anyone that would rely on CNN or FOX deserves being made a fool
@JonasRobert something they present that can’t be refuted. I don’t know what evidence for wide spread voter fraud would be. They are they ones claiming they have the evidence for it . The dominion machine thing would be a start but so far all of it is extremely conspiratorial and out there.
Lol we’ve had This debate already.
@JD~Jordan outed for what
who knows who cares
@JD~Jordan, you just advanced to level 6!
Another thing sidney Powell claimed was all the election places started with 35k votes ok that seems easy to prove whoops the kraken didnt feel like it 😂
It really does hurt your credibility when some of your claims are so easily refuted
Reminder DOJ is still investigating things. We won’t know anything concrete for a bit.
Smartmatic wasnt even used in the places where the filed the bulk of their cases. The company is not link to Dominion they are competitors.
Um... well Barr said they found nothing
They said dominion hacking was responsible for faulty vote counts in counties without dominion machines and most of these places dont hah smartmatic
In the testimonies from IT experts, there was discussion of maneuvering data and pushing ballots to favor the counts. Some districts have not released the physical machines for investigation.
@TW20, you just advanced to level 5!
And Barr is practically Trump's own private lawyer... so if he couldnt find fraud then...well it doesnt look good
@JD~Jordan @james j I think you guys need to just consider what you're saying in another context. Imagine Jim is accused of murder. If their business rival claims they saw them commit the murder...that IS evidence, but probably not enough to convince many ppl. But what if also we had a video of Jim leaving the murder scene...thats more evidence. Maybe still not enough though. What if we found Jim's DNA on the dead body? Maybe we could find an explanation, but the case gets stronger and stronger. What if we found the murder weapon in Jim's car? That still isn't 100% definitive proof. There could be some explanation, but at that point, most juries are gonna say he's guilty. Maybe some juror's would have been convinced at an earlier point. Maybe some still wouldnt convict.
They include Appel hacking machines from 1990 in lawsuit and testimony
@JD~Jordan @james j What I'm asking is to apply the same logic to this election stuff. and to give an example of what evidence you personally would need.
Nope. Not accurate. Before you get to send the elelection machines to be inspected by private companies you need to establish a really good basis for that to take place. There is none.
SCROLL UP... Ive told you like 3 times. Not gonna do it again