Message from @Zuluzeit
Discord ID: 786304513941438545
If the video in GA was proof of fraud, I would support Trump's claim of fraud. Last week, Trump's campaign revealed the video of the cases (not suitcases) being taken from under the table. They also showed that table being set up around 8AM that morning. In the presentation, they said that they would be going over the entire 14 hours of footage to determine how they got there. It should be telling that they have not revealed the source of those cases. They have had 6 days to review the footage. Instead, the Republican SoS revealed that his investigators had already reviewed the footage and interviewed those involved. Those were ballots that had been separated from envelopes during the day. There were not counted there, they were scanned. Observers were present during the time that those ballots were separated. There was surveillance video for the entire time.
lol, sure
If only that were true.
YouTube: 4 years of Russia gate = no ban, 1 month of Stop the Steal and now no one can talk about it
You are a 'useful idiot'.
No personal attacks, please read the rules.
That's not a personal attack, a 'Useful Idiot' is a term used by communists to identify people they've radicalized to espouse opinions that will end in their own death or enslavement.
I'm not going to argue, calling people useful idiots is an insult to their intelligence and insinuating that they are not smart enough to know better.
It has nothing to do with his intelligence. Again, historically, the smarter if not the smartest people are often the most susceptible to the ideas presented by communists.
At best and only needed is the premise is that the Ballots were submitted or counted in violation of Law. Fraud or Criminal Intent is not required. Are Election Laws on a basis of Strict Liability or Intent Based?
Again, not going to argue this. Don't use the term to refer to people in here.
could you not
why u tagging everyone? that's annoying
@busillis okay. How so?
oh no
I think that the goal is to ensure that all legal votes are counted. Disenfranchising voters on the basis that an election worker may have violated a technicality seems to be a dangerous path to go down. Election workers could then "accidentally" disenfranchise votes that are likely cast for the candidate they don't want to win.
Dear mother bored dictator I didn't know that everyone is out of bounds sorry.
OK can i go back to ignoring this channel now 😛
I was just joking
You can't disenfranchise an Illegal Vote.
I'd have it turned off if I could.
And I've brought it up.
Well I haven't noticed previously and have noted your objections and will proceed per your wishes.
It's because it pings literally everyone on the entire discord server, including their phones if they have that set up. It's highly annoying for people to do this randomly.
Oh...
I learned something I didn't know that.
Sorry
Accidentally refers to "Intent". No Intent is required under Strict Liability!
@ here is better, I think.
No, it isn't. Does much the same.
Anyone that is in this channel will get a notification.
Gotcha, I thought there was one more specific.
Again, sorry
All good, please don't do it again is all.
I will not and would not have had I known the functionality.
roughly 135 million voters were disenfranchised.
@busillis. That is a great Intent Defence. Let's hope the Rule wasn't under Strict Liability....lol
I didn't damage anyone hopefully?
@busillis. I just using you as an example to my argument. Nothing Personal.