Now that's a little over the top.

I believe Wisconsin is in the same boat.

I think Detroit county's election authority also posted to his facebook instructions for circumventing any ID requirements for getting an absentee ballot.

YOu konw, those Chinese aren't very smart.

Have to give them extra instructions.

Honestly, I don't think it will be quite like that. I think the global uber elite look at the CCP as just a model of what they want.

I think the elite went to China 20 years ago and decided they liked what they saw.

ohh shit, no.

I almost hate watching Tucker because it's too crazy.

Did you see the one where someone in the House proposed a bill to bring back anyone who'd been deported. Regardless of why, including child sexual assualt? Buying them plane tickets!

Holy shit, that's worse than anything I've ever seen

https://www.foxnews.com/opinion/tucker-carlson-criminals-would-be-protected-from-deportation-under-bill-aoc-and-other-house-democrats-back

I think thats the one.

Careful, we're going to need a lot of help from him.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=O7uKDdy181I
PA has basically said they broke their own constitution but they don't care.

The problem is WE HAVE NO IDEA HOW MANY PENNSYLVANIANS ACTUALLY VOTED.

They removed all requirements. ANYONE ON THE PLANET COULD HAVE VOTED in the PA election.

you've already established you are basically not literate, so anyone one else?

There were no signature verifications, if you registered without an address they jsut gave you one.

You literally could have mailed in a cocktail napkin with the letter B on it and they would have filled out an official ballot for you and run it through the system.

PA still has to follow their own laws.

Their compelling case is 'What we did was totally unconstitutional, but if you actually make us follow our own rules it will be really bad.'

They basically admit it.

This is, on it's face true. However it's a bit of a bait and switch. The legislature did part. Then the governor pulled the rug out from under EVERYTHING.

When they passed it, PA had a very formal request-only process.

The govenor then pulled out all semblence of procedure.

At the end of the day, it doesn't matter.

it was unconstitutional, whoever passed it.

Alito tried to get PA to fix things and the PA courts told him to fuck off.

Before the election.

I also think Biden and Harris have personally attempted to destroy the lives of at least half of the supreme court, so the odds they let this go seem slim.

Are you just willfully manipulative or just stupid?

Here's the response's opening paragraph. There is literally nothing suggesting that the suit is wrong. Just that it's too big of a step. This is basically saying the suit is correct.: Petitioners [Kelly and others] ask this Court to undertake one of the most dramatic, disruptive invocations of judicial power in the history of the Republic. No court has ever issued an order nullifying a governor’s certification of presidential election results. And for good reason: “Once the door is opened to judicial invalidation of presidential election results, it will be awfully hard to close that door again. . . . The loss of public trust in our constitutional order resulting from the exercise of this kind of judicial power would be incalculable.

I think the better question, is there any reason to think the SC is going to think that act 77 is legit?

Now, no one knew how long this thing was going to go.

But the issue is the PA constitution is very specific as to who can vote and how.
They started the process to amend the constitution and then abandoned it because they didn't have enough time.
So they knew their law was going to break their constitution and they passed it any way.

What's more insulting is that they passed the laws, they refused to rule on them or correct them, then they try to blame the SC for thinking about holding them accountable.

It's like a bank robber blaming the bank.

You made the rule that stealing money was illegal.

How DARE you!

That's incredibly daft. You do understand how the constitution works, right?

When was that?

As you guys stated before, it's up to the state to establish those rules within their own framework. They didn't follow their own framework.

You do realize that Kelly won his election and if this suit is successful, he will lose, right?

"I'm fine with invalidating the entire election to keep people from having to vote despite Fauci saying it's safe" - Democrats (who are all radical)

Actually, you can say that with the Texas suit, it kind of nullifies the difference between who created the law. Pennsylvanians created an illegal law.

Frankly, I don't know. But the've filed a suit against 4 different states.

Frankly, this election isn't between Donald Trump and Joe Biden. It's between the US Constitution and Chinese Rule

States should be held to the standard 'Our election is only going to count if we can conduct it beyond reproach'. Just by systemically excluding observers the elections should be thrown out.

it's depressing no one considers foreign influence bad.

Biden has numerous pieces of evidence showing him to be compromised by China

But it doesn't even stop there. We've had professors arrested for taking CCP money.

One has to wonder how much of the Press is bought and paid for.

We have Democrats pushing obviously racist policies designed to divide and destroy our country.

I mean Martin Luther King Jr is now Alt Right.

Are you that blind?

Did you not see the video of the Chinese Professor giving a history lesson, bragging about Biden being owned by the CCP?

That would be a legit concern.

There is no legitimate reason this is allowed.

To defend election fraud with, 'That's how it always is' is completely illegitimate.

When bragging to their own students?

I really have to ask, why do you have the image of a person whose theories have lead to the murder of 75 million people in the last century?

I mean, you seriously have the foundation of mass murder. He makes Hitler look like a child.

No, that's bullshit. They don't want Fraud prosecuted otherwise they'd file charges. They'd actually do things to eliminate inconsistencies. The democrats, despite science, despite Fauci saying 'It's safe to vote in person' intentionally eliminated virtually all safegaurds in almost every state.

They intentionally destroyed our country.

There is no downside here for the democrats.

If they get away with it, they win the election.

If they lose, they destroy the country and that's ok with them.

The constitution is going to be fundamentally undermined and they love it.

It's like 'Defund the Police'. They don't want to eliminate police, they want to eliminate police who are bound by the constitution.

The assault isn't against Trump, the assault is against our country.

If you took the election in a vacuum, I'd probably agree.

If they are fake news, then there is no news at all.

You mean the credible ones are the ones paying Nick Sandmann a Billion Dollars? The ones pushing the 1619 project despite widespread bi-partisan criticism? The ones running cover for the democratic re-segregation efforts?

Who cares? There's 10+ states on that suit.

They just used his letterhead

Why would democrats join? Their goal isn't to get Biden elected, it's to destroy the constitution. They've already won. They want to get the box cars and furnaces going.

Yes, the states can either not send electors or the legislature can choose their own.

Look, the states have said they broke their own constitutions.

They just don't care

It's 'Too big to fail'

That's their position.

Read PA's response, when asked to respond to Alito, they say, "this is too big! you can't change this!"

Of course they do. They've disenfranchised 140 million people.

Frankly the state supreme courts should have handled it

Sedition trials need to be started.

We actually need McCarthy.

The odds that the election results are legit are 1 in 100 Trillion.

https://twitter.com/JackPosobiec/status/1336524506312159233?s=20

https://www.newswars.com/the-texas-lawsuit-is-on-the-docket-the-supreme-court-will-determine-the-fate-of-the-2020-election/

*Unlike the allegations of election fraud that are floating around out there, these allegations are very easy to prove.

The following is a brief summary of some of the issues in each of the four states that comes from the Heritage Foundation…

Pennsylvania: The complaint accuses Pennsylvania Secretary of State Kathy Boockvar of, among other things, “without legislative approval, unilaterally abrogating” Pennsylvania statutes that require “signature verification for absentee or mail-in ballots.” These changes were “not ratified” by the Pennsylvania legislature.
Georgia: Similarly, the complaint describes how Georgia’s Secretary of State, Brad Raffensperger, also “without legislative approval, unilaterally abrogated Georgia’s statute governing the signature verification process for absentee ballots.”
Michigan: The complaint states that Michigan Secretary of State Jocelyn Benson “abrogated Michigan election statutes related to absentee ballot applications and signature verification.”
Wisconsin: Lastly, the Wisconsin’s elections commission made similar changes in state laws without the permission of the legislature that “weakened, or did away with, established security procedures put in place by the Wisconsin legislature to ensure absentee ballot integrity.”
For these constitutional violations alone, the election results in all four states should be thrown out.*

That's easy. Because they want to.

They don't care about the repurcussions. They think their lives will be the same until the riots come to them.

Hopefully they can at least give us a chance to survive this cold war.

It's already docketed.

They aren't arguing fraud

Are you illiterate?

lol, sure

If only that were true.

YouTube: 4 years of Russia gate = no ban, 1 month of Stop the Steal and now no one can talk about it