That's the currently available technology.

Nuclear power plants arguably take more energy input to create than they do ever output, although this is disputed in the literature.

Can both parties agree that suitcases of ballots brought out after observers were kicked out and then diligently counted ASAP is blatantly suspicious to the point it looks like you are watching crime being committed. Can a Biden supporter chime in here, put yourself in the other shoes, it would be devastating to watch Trump lising then miraculously winning in a state that was landslides for Biden just hours before. Not just unlikely but boldly and unapologetically stolen when your witnesses were given the boot.

One day will alternative so-called green energy sources yelled more energy output than the input, perhaps.

Also know that global oil output as well as natural output have reached peak production years ago.

You can't have a unlimited growth paradigm economy with a finite oil supply. I'm not saying that you can't get oil out of the ground I'm saying it's not profitable in terms of energy input versus output. This is why the money supply has to continually inflate, in order to pay the debt on past energy infrastructure.

All energy in any form is converted forms of sunshine as radiation. Stored as carbon based fuels, decaying matter from life forms, sunshine, and water. You will use all of it over time its like a battery, but you are just converting matter from one form to another, pollution isn't real. Mars Venus Jupiter, etc.. atmospheres are natural to them and poison to humans. We would need to polute thier atmospheres with oxygen so we could survive. Pollution is in the eye of the organism that can't survive in a natural environment.

1) It does not dictate where they are manufactured. You assume China, but I don't think that is a forgone conclusion. Plus, if the US government were to purchase from a US company and that company chooses to produce offshore - shouldn't we hold the company responsible?

2) Not necessarily. There are advancements made every day. Unless we push the envelope, we don't advance. If Motorola decided that mobile phone technology was not viable based on the fact that the 1970's technology meant that a mobile phones were the size of suitcases, we wouldn't be living in the world we do today. Moving forward with new technologies will encourage advancements in those technologies. We have already seen massive improvement in the efficiency of solar panels in the last 20 years.

3) Where does it say that they want to nationalize energy production that was previously private? Government is already involved in energy production. Dams are government owned. Nuclear power plants are government owned. Most of our oil and coal burning power plants are government owned. I don't get the distinction.

@TaLoN132, you just advanced to level 29!

If the video in GA was proof of fraud, I would support Trump's claim of fraud. Last week, Trump's campaign revealed the video of the cases (not suitcases) being taken from under the table. They also showed that table being set up around 8AM that morning. In the presentation, they said that they would be going over the entire 14 hours of footage to determine how they got there. It should be telling that they have not revealed the source of those cases. They have had 6 days to review the footage. Instead, the Republican SoS revealed that his investigators had already reviewed the footage and interviewed those involved. Those were ballots that had been separated from envelopes during the day. There were not counted there, they were scanned. Observers were present during the time that those ballots were separated. There was surveillance video for the entire time.

lol, sure

If only that were true.

YouTube: 4 years of Russia gate = no ban, 1 month of Stop the Steal and now no one can talk about it

You are a 'useful idiot'.

No personal attacks, please read the rules.

That's not a personal attack, a 'Useful Idiot' is a term used by communists to identify people they've radicalized to espouse opinions that will end in their own death or enslavement.

I'm not going to argue, calling people useful idiots is an insult to their intelligence and insinuating that they are not smart enough to know better.

It has nothing to do with his intelligence. Again, historically, the smarter if not the smartest people are often the most susceptible to the ideas presented by communists.

At best and only needed is the premise is that the Ballots were submitted or counted in violation of Law. Fraud or Criminal Intent is not required. Are Election Laws on a basis of Strict Liability or Intent Based?

Again, not going to argue this. Don't use the term to refer to people in here.

could you not

@busillis Please don't abuse the @ everyone.

why u tagging everyone? that's annoying

@busillis okay. How so?

oh no

I think that the goal is to ensure that all legal votes are counted. Disenfranchising voters on the basis that an election worker may have violated a technicality seems to be a dangerous path to go down. Election workers could then "accidentally" disenfranchise votes that are likely cast for the candidate they don't want to win.

Dear mother bored dictator I didn't know that everyone is out of bounds sorry.

OK can i go back to ignoring this channel now 😛

I was just joking

I now know to what I'm changing my user name.

You can't disenfranchise an Illegal Vote.

I'd have it turned off if I could.

And I've brought it up.

Well I haven't noticed previously and have noted your objections and will proceed per your wishes.

It's because it pings literally everyone on the entire discord server, including their phones if they have that set up. It's highly annoying for people to do this randomly.

Oh...

I learned something I didn't know that.

Sorry

Accidentally refers to "Intent". No Intent is required under Strict Liability!

@ here is better, I think.

No, it isn't. Does much the same.