I think the Supreme Court may deal with the state administration changing election rules versus the state legislation but I don't think they'll touch the whole did the state legislature make a unconstitutional (via the state constitution) law issue

Yeah...

Process over outcome. Without the carrot of remedy, you rarely get the effort for pursuit.

@TaLoN132 I think the one aspect intersects with the US Constitution and the other is internal to the state and I don't see SCOTUS touching that second one

YouTube become a distribution platform for all mainstream content created by large media companies.

Makes sense... I think it comes down to standing and remedy. I still wonder if and of the states will countersue TX for pre-election voter suppressio - removing drop boxes and such.

@TaLoN132 in practice does the other states joining the case add more weight to it or not?

well TX argument will be that the state legislature didn't authorize it so couldn't have extra drop boxes

@Zuluzeit Actually, it is rather not convenient at all.

Heh, that would be actually enforcing the legislature, the opposite of their accusations, so it might bolster their case.

@markmen Ok, I'm now 7 minutes behind, and i tihnk I get what your saying now. Yeah, what @busillis and i were talking about was how present day events (as I see them) resemble a psyops which a 1990's hacker group called Cult of the Dead Cow discussed on UseNet 25 years ago. And one of their members has been in federal cyber security since about the mid-Bush administration. Other key CotDC members have been moving around different parts of the deep state and both major political parties for years. When you also separate the current Republican Party into "always been GOP" vs. "used to be Reform, Libertarian, or Independant Party" things start to look very interesting. I think we are watching a psyops play out, and right now Criminals in the DNC are the targets.

They apparently had been there before. The Governor decided that they only needed one for county and removed the rest. Houston had like 5m residents sharing 1 drop box.

I don't know. I am guessing it shouldn't matter, but who knows? I think that Trump intervention might have more of an impact, because he is more impacted than anyone. That's just my commonsense read to it. I have no legal training to speak of to have a fully educated opinion.

Harris county was constantly encroaching and performing hostile incorporations of the surrounding areas when I lived there.

I have no legal training to speak of to have a fully educated opinion.

@TaLoN132 Then you're in excellent company.

You had pockets of towns that had to go through great lengths to block it.

@Zuluzeit (ok, I'm responding to your comment from 13 minutes ago, as I've said to the others I'm lagging) yes, that's exactly my point. The issue is people need to start lookign into how easy it is to just set up their own platform, then major social media would be surrounded by competitors, and censorship would not be an issue...however, section 230 becomes a problem because it allows one to police w/o being policed ... it's remove would return us to the original situation, one is responsible to the extent one is not involved. Thus responsibility would bear a direct relationship to accountability.

@Autumn_Katrina it would be so cool to see them bagged

@Autumn_Katrina I gotchu. Misunderstood your contention...slightly.

I think that some part of the SCOTUS decision will be to weigh in on whether extenuating circumstances like the understanding that a pandemic could factor into whether the state's appointed election officials would be able to make certain temporary accommodations for their citizens under sweeping responsibilities given to ensure free and safe elections. I think there is a case to be made for it and it might be a way out for them. Governments are often granted extraordinary powers in times of crises. I think it will also matter the timing of the changes - were they reasonable when they were enacted versus what we might think now.

@TaLoN132 that certainly will the defense

Will be dam it

Will trump supporters accept scouts response if they denied the case . Like how in the beginning they said “courts decide”

so the SCOTUS case is not a fraud case it's a procedural case ... it is alleged that the states didn't follow the US Constitution in running their election and thus infringed upon the voters in the states that did ... there is no allegation of fraud

It supposes that there was fraud and that their states were injured

I don’t see it as a viable case

There is fraud but ‘not enough’ to overturn

If they focus on the state constitution they have no case at all

Not a federal issue

That was the ruling in the AZ suit

Not necessarily fraud but ‘mistakes’

The az suit found .03 error in the audit

On 100 ballots

Or something

No they did a thousand or so

But on 1500 .05

They found 2 in the 100

Right

.05

As a Trump voter and constitution supporter (not a trump “supporter”) yes I will.

Or.5