Message from @Grenadier
Discord ID: 544566806782803968
To make it worse, the teacher is Jewish and talks about “his” white privilege
We won't lose...
We might have to ally with the East Asians and Indochinese to win
If we want to win within our current system
They’re majority conservative by a small margin
@VinceChaos The historical term would be along the lines of Castizo. I see white hispanic used fairly regularly. Spaniard gets used too depending.
I need to use those terms more. That and mestizo
@VinceChaos To be fair, I always thought the term White Hispanic was a bit redundant like White British.
I used to think those were slurs
Well, I'm sure some are taken that way. Zambo, for example, is prooobably not considered a particularly.... favorable denominator.
I have a hard time calling Indios or Africans Hispanic, regardless of what language they speak.
This tbh. Hispanics refer to people from Spain and Portugal
I think the term has been americanized to mean people from South America generally, mostly regardless of ancestry.
If you ask a boomer what a hispanic is you'll probably get something along those lines.
The average boomer probably doesn’t interact with these people enough to understand the nuances to it
Exactly
http://archive.is/ZEOTf
This doesn't seem like a very good play for Breitbart and J-Cons at large.
Ackshually, castizo refers to someone about 3/4s white. Criollo is the term for entirely white latinos @Grenadier
It seems like semantics, but spains racial castes were very detailed
The term seems to be fairly flexible, "Castizo (Spanish: [kasˈtiθo] or [kasˈtiso]) is a Spanish word with a general meaning of "pure", "genuine" or representative of its race (from the Spanish: "casta").", they likely considered this to be the case given Spains policy of forced mixing with the local population.
For White Hispanics in Latin America, I think the term Criollo would be more Accurate and less redundant than White Hispanic.
Perfect I’ll have to look up that pronunciation haha
I bet Europeans can tell who is criollo or Castillo better than white Americans
I don’t even have a clever comment for this one
From the limited reading I've done, the impression I get is they didn't really purity spiral much about the differentiation between Castizo and Criollo. They essentially considered Castizos to be spanish, which makes sense given the history and policy of the conquest of South America.
TLDR; conquistadors weren't wignats
When Spain ruled Mexico it functioned a lot better than it does today
Fun fact : The people who most often rebelled against the Spanish empire in the colonies were, Criollos not Mestizos.
Because under the Casta system, Criollo were subordinate to Penninsulars ( European born Spaniards ).
So even if a Criollo family was incredibly wealthy and influential they'd always have to play second fiddle to their Euro born counterparts.
Which is really the same pattern that was repeated in pretty much all colonial territories.
Simon Bolivar is one everyone probably knows
I caught BrightonGoose using an alt account here....
https://www.reddit.com/r/shufflesdeck/comments/ajoljt/a_quick_reminder_to_not_harass_anyone_or_brigade/eg8i2dm?utm_source=reddit-android
Need some upvotes
I'm being brigaded on a sub by a guy with multiple accounts
@Logan always. Trying to get the dude. Perma banned for his behavior. It was inevitable that some left winger would move into the sub and cause problems
D E P O R T
@bspon002 “Are ya winning son?”
Lol
Less than a month until the conference. Pumped!
Indeed