Message from @campodin
Discord ID: 492800077325271064
Civil liberties should be warred against
Indeed
yes, civil liberties can be withdrawn for emergencies. However, rights cannot be infringed
depends what civil liberties
some yes some no
What Campodin said
Yeah it's fine.
what exactly is defined as "civil liberties" and how are they different from your rights?
The police are not there to protect you, they are there to protect the law.
Yes
@grilomoto civil liberties are the things the government allows you to do and protects.
sacrifice multiple civil liberties
the only real dependence is what kind of government it is
is it a nepotistic deep state
or one true to its people
protection of privacy is a good example of a civil liberty imo
oh ok good
Answer is no
it is really murky waters because naturally the two overlap
where i'm from voting is obligatory 😢
@Summī Imperator, 呪い殿 what's the difference if it is part of the law that they should protect you?
Because ultimately the police serve the state, and must follow the laws of the Governing force.
Otherwise they don't have a job
but what's the practical difference?
Well, the difference is that if you have a law that demands their protection of the people then it is not impossible to amend laws by bills and reduce, or remove that obligation to protect.
what
"the right" is impossible to define accurately, thus proving once again the right/left paradigm is a tool of our enemy. It is not right v left, rather national v global
I intend to be on the side of nationhood, even if that means I may seem like a "leftist" at times to some
@V-NAF_Aardist this is true, for what does the fascist have in common with a monarchist or the libertarian with your typical Christian conservative? Yet all these are apparently rightwing ideologies.
@everyone Daily Question 🔖
Should the United States be worried about China? Are they a threat militarily or economically?
GAY
no u
yes
China number 1
china needs to die
China numba wun
@campodin yes
chai na namba wunnn
China numba wannn