Better then making nothing

No, there is no way to scientifically decide how many race there are and to which one someone belongs.

Haha, not to far off.

I unironically believe Nationalism is left-wing.

Space sucks

At least Africa has land

Terraforming won't work.

Well, Totalitarianism is a bit hard to define. In its original meaning it was an intrinsically Fascist phenomenon.

Oof

Authoritarianism will always be necessary.

That wouldn't work, a strongman wouldn't just give up power like that. Furthermore, it is simply easier to suppress dissenters when they are fringe.

Yes

here is active much

good

good

yes

much is active here

@Mr. Wright I don't like your name, and your pfp is a tad edgy too.

I support the right to bear a sword.

And a crossbow

Not sure about guns, though.

Yeah

It's nice

your name I mean

Yeah

I vaguely remembered where'd I'd seen it before.

But I had to look it up.

At first I was afraid you were a witch.

But maybe you just want to burn witches, which is nice.

But honestly, I only care if I can wear a sword around.

Ugh, women in politics.

I just don't agree with women being members of parties, having leadership roles in those parties and spending too much of their time protesting.

@Doctor Anon What?

Ah

I get you

Right wing?

True

Poor thing

It was nothing more then a pilgrim, who had came to offer you his praise.

Yet you gassed it.

That's beyond rude.

You're probably going to get haunted by that lizard from now on, by the way.

To be honest, lizard-gassers deserve gassing.

The negroes just want to be fat in peace, let them be.

The differance is that the Bible is right.

Sexism is a good thing, the be honest.

It's just human nature, there is a fundemental differance between man and woman. This differance manifests itself in the roles of men and women.

Sexism is, in the end, first and foremost derived from values. If you value equality then it would be a bad thing, however, if your values are derived from God and tradition, you see no problem in it.

Values do not come from logic, and what is logical depends on our values.

You can still argue for your own values, after all, most people don't realize values are not derived from logic. Values really come from your family, your culture and, hopefully, God.

If you value equality, you will see the differances of man and woman as a bad thing. If you value inequality, you will see it as a good thing. Both of these perspectives are equally logical, they both recognize the truth of the differance. However, they view it in different ways.

@ham addition Ideaologies can also have a value system.

I derive my values from tradition. Why? Because I want to. You can list a bunch of things that you think are good with doing that, but, in the end, what you think is good is based on your values.

Well, I have reappropriated the word "sexism".

I don't mean that I hate women by it, but most of the things that are now seen as sexist, I see as good.

Not allowing women as rulers, for example.

What do you mean?

That is not their role, it is not appropriate for them to be rulers.

Take note on how most of those examples were monarchs.

They were born and bread to rule. Of course they would be atleast somewhat compitent even if they were women.

This does not change the fact that governance is not appropriate for women.

It's not that they are worse as rulers, although most are, it is that it isn't approptiate.

And this comes from values

It isn't appropriate because my values say so. It doesn't make any sense trying to explain it after that.

It is so because it is.

Like how peadophilia is wrong because it is. Not because children can't consent, they can, but because it simply is.

It is the same principle. Peadophilia is bad, so is female rulers (not to the same degree of course). Why are these two things bad? Well, they just are.

Most of the times doing such acts hurts the child, but not always. Yet, I still believe it is wrong.

I'm definetly not saying the two are in any way equally bad.

Obviously, peadophilia is worse.

But why is it bad?

Children can consent. But I think it is still horrible.

It is a very dangerous mindset to have, because the only thing you have to do to make you belive peadophilia is moral is to convince you children can consent.

I, however, will still think it is horrible.

Alright

To truely argue for my case we have to delve deep into the value systems we both hold.

Of course, it is a little bit more complicated then just deciding what morals to have because we humans have a built-in sense of morality, although that can be eroded. We have a whole feild to discuss such things, Ethics.

In any case, why would it make sense just to decide what is moral or not based on weather it hurts other people?

Alright

Good bye

Yes, exactly.

Well I mean, it is logical

You can't decide what is good or what is bad using science

In my yet to be molded opinion, Protectionism is a good thing. However, I don't really know anything about the matter.

@ᗪㄖㄖ乃ㄚᐯ I like your name.

Agreed

Also, the Sweden Democrats are just socialists with some weak civic nationalism sprinkled on top.

Well, I don't know about that but Alternativ för Sverige is definetly better.

Indeed

Sweden Democrats are stupid

Well, the left-right spectrum is something that differs depending on the culture and time-period you are in.

Authoritarianism is good, though.

It is not about rebelling, it's about subscribing to the old system.

And forsaking the new one.

Fascism is progressive, but the EU is indeed not fascist, yes.

Oof.

Ethnostates are indeed gay.

That definition is also gay, though.

Oh, how I pity thee, thou amerimutt!

Arabs are nice when they are in their own countries.