We need to trade a bit of liberty for a lot of security, never the other way around

@Gamer4713 That's trading lots of liberty for a little security ie a bad idea

I do not want my liberties taken away for security.

I will give away one small one at most.

no u

Yeah, ofc

Sometimes you just have to

Some

Not completely

Privacy is needed so people can experiment on not so nicely percieved actions whithout persecutions

Its just humans

While monitoring streets with a lotta cameras and buying data from facebook google+ is quite on line but acceptable, spying with hidden microphones in CPUs (which did happen if you dont remember the famous reddit controversy) is completely off charts and should be punishable

ayyy

sexy lady

op op op op

oppan gangnam style

Why?

Suspending civil liberties should only be done sparingly if ever, and even then only the most dire of circumstances, such as nationwide famine or invasion.

Civil liberties should be warred against

Indeed

yes, civil liberties can be withdrawn for emergencies. However, rights cannot be infringed

depends what civil liberties

some yes some no

What Campodin said

Yeah it's fine.

what exactly is defined as "civil liberties" and how are they different from your rights?

The police are not there to protect you, they are there to protect the law.

Yes

@grilomoto civil liberties are the things the government allows you to do and protects.

sacrifice multiple civil liberties

the only real dependence is what kind of government it is

is it a nepotistic deep state

or one true to its people

protection of privacy is a good example of a civil liberty imo

@campodin and how that differs from your rights? any example?

oh ok good

Answer is no

it is really murky waters because naturally the two overlap

voting is a civil liberty

where i'm from voting is obligatory 😢

@Summī Imperator, 呪い殿 what's the difference if it is part of the law that they should protect you?