Message from @Milk
Discord ID: 492787030170927135
I will give away one small one at most.
no u
Yeah, ofc
Sometimes you just have to
Some
Not completely
Privacy is needed so people can experiment on not so nicely percieved actions whithout persecutions
Its just humans
While monitoring streets with a lotta cameras and buying data from facebook google+ is quite on line but acceptable, spying with hidden microphones in CPUs (which did happen if you dont remember the famous reddit controversy) is completely off charts and should be punishable
ayyy
sexy lady
op op op op
oppan gangnam style
Why?
Suspending civil liberties should only be done sparingly if ever, and even then only the most dire of circumstances, such as nationwide famine or invasion.
Civil liberties should be warred against
Indeed
yes, civil liberties can be withdrawn for emergencies. However, rights cannot be infringed
depends what civil liberties
some yes some no
Yeah it's fine.
what exactly is defined as "civil liberties" and how are they different from your rights?
The police are not there to protect you, they are there to protect the law.
Yes
@grilomoto civil liberties are the things the government allows you to do and protects.
sacrifice multiple civil liberties
the only real dependence is what kind of government it is
is it a nepotistic deep state
or one true to its people
protection of privacy is a good example of a civil liberty imo
oh ok good
Answer is no
it is really murky waters because naturally the two overlap
voting is a civil liberty
where i'm from voting is obligatory 😢
@Summī Imperator, 呪い殿 what's the difference if it is part of the law that they should protect you?
Because ultimately the police serve the state, and must follow the laws of the Governing force.
Otherwise they don't have a job
but what's the practical difference?